Abstract
If we limit ourselves in the use of the external fixator to its strictest indications, then it is not in competition with the standard procedures of internal fixation. The external fixator should be viewed rather as an alternative to the methods of intramedullary nailing or plating, applicable whenever nailing or plating is considered too hazardous. We must remember, however, that bony union of fresh fractures usually takes longer with external fixation than with rigid internal fixation. Exceptions, of course, are the osteotomies carried out in metaphyseal areas of bone, or joint arthrodesis, where broad surfaces of cancellous and well-vascularized bone are brought under compression. These considerations pertain more to the tibia than to other bones that are protected by more circumferential muscle cover, so that both a delay of internal fixation and the different devices are better tolerated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hierholzer, G., Rüedi, T., Allgöwer, M., Schatzker, J. (1985). Indications for External Skeletal Fixation Versus Internal Fixation. In: Manual on the AO/ASIF Tubular External Fixator. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12416-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12416-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-12418-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-12416-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive