Zusammenfassung
Innovation und technischer Wandel sind — nach anfänglichen AkzeptanzproblemenI - längst zu Zentralthemen der ökonomischen Forschung und insbesondere der modernen Industrieökonomik geworden. In unserem Beitrag möchten wir einige politikrelevante Ergebnisse dieser Forschungsarbeiten aus den letzten Jahren zusammenfassen, Forschungslücken identifizieren, und soweit wie möglich hnplikationen für die Politikgestaltung ableiten. Bei den von uns herangezogenen theoretischen Ergebnissen orientieren wir uns dabei häufig (aber keinesfalls ausschließlich) an spieltheoretisch fundierten Modellen, die von uns dargestellten empirischen Ergebnisse sind zumeist ökonometrische Studien mit Unternehmen oder Industrien als Beobachtungseinheit.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literaturverzeichnis
Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch (1990). Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Acs, Z. J., D. B. Audretsch and M. P. Feldman (1992). “Real Effects of Academic Rese- arch: Comment,” American Economic Review. Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 363–367.
Allen, W. L. (1991). Opening Doors: The Life & Work of Joseph Schumpeter. New Brunswick: Transaction.
Baldwin, W. L. und J. T. Scott (1987). Market Structure und Technological Change. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Bernstein, J. I. (1988). “Costs of Production, Intra-and Interindustry R & D Spillovers: Canadian Evidence,” Canadian Journal of Economics. Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 324–347.
Bernstein, J. I. (1989). “The Structure of Canadian Inter-Industry R & D Spillovers and the Rates of Return to R & D,” Journal of Industrial Economics. Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 315–336.
Bernstein, J. I. and M. I. Nadiri (1988). “Interindustry R & D Spillovers, Rates of Return, and Production in High-Tech Industries,” AEA Papers and Proceedings. Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 429–434.
Bernstein, J. I. and M. I. Nadiri (1989). “Research and Development and Intraindustry Spillovers: An Empirical Application of Dynamic Duality,” Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 56, pp. 249–269.
Bernstein, J. I. and M. I. Nadiri (1991). “Product Demand, Cost of Production, Spillovers, and the Social Rate of Return to R & D,” Working Paper No. 3625, National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, Mass.
Braulke, M. (1992). “Quo Vadis I. O.? Stand und Entwicklungsperspektiven der Industrieökonomik” mimeo, Universität Osnabrück.
Bresnahan, T. F. (1989). “Empirical Studies of Industries with Market Power,” in: R. Schmalensee und R. D. Willig (Ed.). Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2, pp. 1011–1057. Amsterdam, North-Holland.
Brodley, J. F. (1990). “Antitrust Law and Innovation Cooperation”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 4, S. 97–111.
Choi, J.P. (1991). “Dynamic R & D Competition Under ‘Hazard Rate’ Uncertainty,” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 22, No. 4, S. 596–610.
Cohen, W. M. und R. C. Levin (1989). “Empirical Studies of Innovation und Market Structure,” in: R. Schmalensee und R. D. Willig (Ed.). Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2, pp. 1060–1107. Amsterdam, North-Holland.
Cohen, W. M. und D. A. Levinthal (1989). “Innovation und Learning: The Two Faces of R & D,” Economic Journal. Vol. 99, pp. 569–596.
Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1990a). “The Implications of Spillovers for R & D Investment and Welfare: A New Perspective,” Administrative Science Ouarterly. Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 128–152.
Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1990b). “The Implications of Spillovers for R & D Investment and Welfare: A New Perspective,” in: A. N. Link (Ed.). Advances in Applied Micro-Economics, Vol. 5, pp. 29–45. London, JAI Press.
De Bondt, R., P. Slaets and B. Cassiman (1992). “The Degree of Spillovers and the Number of Rivals for Maximum Effective R & D,” International Journal of Industrial Or2anization. Vol. 10, pp. 35–54.
Dierkes, M. and U. Hoffmann, Eds. (1992). New Technology at the Outset - Social Forces in the Shaping of Technological Innovations. Frankfurt, Campus/Westview.
Dixit, A. (1988). “A General Model of R & D Competition and Policy,” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, No. 3, S. 317–326.
Dosi, G. (1988). “Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation,” Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 26, pp. 1120–1171.
Fisher, F.M. (1989). “Games Economists Play: An Noncooperative View,” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 20, No. 1, S. 113–124.
Fisher, F.M. (1991). “Organizing Industrial Organisazion: Reflections on the Handbook of Industrial Organization”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, S. 201–240.
Fisher, F.M. und P.Temin (1973). “Returns to Scale in Research and Development: What does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis Imply?” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, S. 56–70.
Freeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Fritsch, M. (1991). “Die Übernahme neuer Techniken durch Industriebetriebe,” Ifo-Studien S. 3–18.
Gallini, N.T. (1992). “Patent Policy and Costly Imitation,” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 23, No. 1, S. 52–63.
Gifford, S. (1992). “Innovation, Firm Size and Growth in a centralized Organisation”, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 23, No. 2, S. 284–298.
Griliches, Z. (1991). “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey,” Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 28, No. 4, S. 1661–1707.
Griliches, Z. (1979). “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth,” Bell Journal of Economics. Vol. 10, pp. 92–116.
Griliches, Z. (1992). “The Search for R & D Spillovers,” mimeo, Harvard University.
Grupp, H. und Schmoch, U. (1992). Wissenschaftsbindung der Technik - Panorama der internationalen Entwicklung und sektorales Tableau für Westdeutschland. Heidelberg: Physika-Springer.
Harhoff, D. (1991). Strategic Spillover Production, Vertical Organization, and Incentives for Research and Development. Unveröffentlichte Ph.D.-Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, Mass.
Henderson, R. (1990). “Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence from the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry,” Discussion Paper No. 3163–90 BPS, Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Henderson, R. and I. Cockburn (1992). “Scale, Scope and Spillovers: Research Strategy and Research Productivity in the Pharmaceutical Industry,” Discussion Paper, Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Henderson, R., A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (1991). “Basicness, Appropriability and Agglomeration Effects in the Generation of New Knowledge: A Comparison of University and Corporate Research with the Aid of Patent Data,” Discussion Paper, Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Henderson, R. M. and K. B. Clark (1990). “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms,” Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 9–30.
Hippel, Eric von (1989). The Sources of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holmstrom B.R. and J. Tirole (1989). “The Theory of the Firm”, in: R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig (Ed.). Handbook of Industrial Economics, Vol. 1, S. 61–133. Amsterdam, North-Holland.
Jacobs, O. und C. Spengel (1992). “Unternehmensbesteuerung und Finanzierung–Eine vergleichende Analyse der Besteuerungskonzeptionen für Kapitalgesellschaften in Deutschland, Frankreich und Großbritannien”, ZEW Discussion Paper Nr. 92–03.
Jaffe, A. B. (1986). “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R & D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits, and Market Value,” American Economic Review. Vol. 76, No. 5, pp. 984–1001.
Jaffe, A. B. (1988). “Demand and Supply Influences in R & D Intensity and Productivity Growth,” Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 431–437.
Jaffe, A. (1989a). “Characterizing the ‘technological position’ of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers,” Research Policy. Vol. 18, pp. 87–97.
Jensen, R. (1988a). “Information Capacity and Innovation Adoption”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 6, S. 335–350.
Jensen, R. (1988b). “hnformation Cost and Innovation Adoption Capacitiy” Management Science, Vol. 34, S. 230–239.
Jorde, T. M. and D. J. Treece (1990). “Innovation and Cooperation: Implications for Competition and Antitrust”, Journal of Economic Perspectives Vol. 4, Number 3, S. 75–96.
Kleinknecht, A. (1989). “Firm Size and Innovations: Observations in Dutch Manufacturing Industry”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 1, S. 215–222.
König, H. und K. F. Zimmermann (1986). “Innovations, Market Structure and Market Dynamics,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. Vol. 142, S. 184199.
Kreps, David M. (1991). A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Levin, R. C., W. M. Cohen and D. C. Mowery (1985). “R & D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses,” AEA Papers and Proceedings. Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 20–24.
Levin, R. C., A. K. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson and S. G. Winter (1987). “Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. pp. 783–820.
Levin, R. C. and P. C. Reiss (1988). “Cost-Reducing and Demand-Creating R & D with Spillovers,” Rand Journal of Economics. Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 538–556.
Lichtenberg, F. (1987). “The Effect of Government Funding on Private Industrial Research and Development: A Reassessment,” Journal of Industrial Economics. Vol. 36, pp. 551–561.
Lichtenberg, F. (1988). “The Private R & D Investment Response to Federal Design and Technical Competititons,” American Economic Review. Vol. 78, pp. 550–559.
Mansfield, E. (1985). “How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?,” Journal of Industrial Economics. Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 217–223.
Mairaisse, J. und M. Sassenou (1991). “R & D and Productivity: A Survey of Econometric Studies at the Firm Level,” NBER Working Paper. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.
Pavitt, K. (1984). “Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy und a Theory,” Research Policy. Vol. 13, No. 6, S. 343–373.
Reinganum, J. F. (1981). “Dynamic Games of Innovation,” Journal of Economic Theory. Vol. 25, pp. 21–41.
Reinganum, J. F. (1989). “The Timing of Innovation: Research, Development, und Diffusion,” in: R. Schmalensee und R. D. Willig (Ed.). Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1, pp. 849–908. Amsterdam, North-Holland.
Scherer, Frederic M. (1992). “Schumpeter and Plausible Capitalism”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 30, No. 3, S. 1416–1433
Schwalbach, J. und K. F. Zimmermann (1991a). “A Poisson Model of Patenting and Firm Structure in Germany”, in: Acs, Z. und D. Audretsch (Hrsg.), Innovation and Technical Change. An International Comparison, New York. S. 109–120.
Schwalbach, J. und K. F. Zimmermann (1991b). “Determinanten der Patentaktivität”, IfoStudien, Vol. 37, S. 201–227.
Shapiro, C. (1989a). “The Theory of Business Behavior”, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 20, No. 1, S. 125–137.
Shapiro, C. (1989b). “Theories of Oligopoly Behavior”, in: R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig (Ed.). Handbook of Industrial Economics, Vol. 1, S. 329–413. Amsterdam, North-Holland.
Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Spence, M. A. (1984). “Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance,” Econometrica. Vol. 52, pp. 101–121.
Sutton, J. (1990). Sunk Costs und Market Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Trajtenberg, M. (1990). “A Penny for your Quotes: Patent Citations und the Value of Innovations,” RAND Journal of Economics. Vol. 21, No. 1, S. 172–190.
Weizsäcker, C. C. v. (1980). Barriers to Entry - A Theoretical Treatment. Berlin: Springer.
Winter, S. G. (1984). “Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes,” Journal of Economic Behavior und Organization. Vol. 5, S. 287–320.
Witt, Ulrich (1987). Individualistische Grundlagen der evolutorischen Ökonomik. Tübingen: Mohr.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Harhoff, D., König, H. (1993). Neuere Ansätze der Industrieökonomik — Konsequenzen für Eine Industrie- und Technologiepolitik. In: Meyer-Krahmer, F. (eds) Innovationsökonomie und Technologiepolitik. Technik, Wirtschaft und Politik, vol 1. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12072-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12072-9_4
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0689-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-12072-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive