Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Innovationsökonomie und Technologiepolitik pp 47–67Cite as

Neuere Ansätze der Industrieökonomik — Konsequenzen für Eine Industrie- und Technologiepolitik

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Technik, Wirtschaft und Politik ((TECH.WIRTSCHAFT,volume 1))

Zusammenfassung

Innovation und technischer Wandel sind — nach anfänglichen AkzeptanzproblemenI - längst zu Zentralthemen der ökonomischen Forschung und insbesondere der modernen Industrieökonomik geworden. In unserem Beitrag möchten wir einige politikrelevante Ergebnisse dieser Forschungsarbeiten aus den letzten Jahren zusammenfassen, Forschungslücken identifizieren, und soweit wie möglich hnplikationen für die Politikgestaltung ableiten. Bei den von uns herangezogenen theoretischen Ergebnissen orientieren wir uns dabei häufig (aber keinesfalls ausschließlich) an spieltheoretisch fundierten Modellen, die von uns dargestellten empirischen Ergebnisse sind zumeist ökonometrische Studien mit Unternehmen oder Industrien als Beobachtungseinheit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Acs, Z. J. and D. B. Audretsch (1990). Innovation and Small Firms. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., D. B. Audretsch and M. P. Feldman (1992). “Real Effects of Academic Rese- arch: Comment,” American Economic Review. Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 363–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, W. L. (1991). Opening Doors: The Life & Work of Joseph Schumpeter. New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, W. L. und J. T. Scott (1987). Market Structure und Technological Change. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. I. (1988). “Costs of Production, Intra-and Interindustry R & D Spillovers: Canadian Evidence,” Canadian Journal of Economics. Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 324–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. I. (1989). “The Structure of Canadian Inter-Industry R & D Spillovers and the Rates of Return to R & D,” Journal of Industrial Economics. Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. I. and M. I. Nadiri (1988). “Interindustry R & D Spillovers, Rates of Return, and Production in High-Tech Industries,” AEA Papers and Proceedings. Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 429–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. I. and M. I. Nadiri (1989). “Research and Development and Intraindustry Spillovers: An Empirical Application of Dynamic Duality,” Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 56, pp. 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. I. and M. I. Nadiri (1991). “Product Demand, Cost of Production, Spillovers, and the Social Rate of Return to R & D,” Working Paper No. 3625, National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braulke, M. (1992). “Quo Vadis I. O.? Stand und Entwicklungsperspektiven der Industrieökonomik” mimeo, Universität Osnabrück.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, T. F. (1989). “Empirical Studies of Industries with Market Power,” in: R. Schmalensee und R. D. Willig (Ed.). Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2, pp. 1011–1057. Amsterdam, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodley, J. F. (1990). “Antitrust Law and Innovation Cooperation”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 4, S. 97–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J.P. (1991). “Dynamic R & D Competition Under ‘Hazard Rate’ Uncertainty,” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 22, No. 4, S. 596–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. und R. C. Levin (1989). “Empirical Studies of Innovation und Market Structure,” in: R. Schmalensee und R. D. Willig (Ed.). Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 2, pp. 1060–1107. Amsterdam, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. und D. A. Levinthal (1989). “Innovation und Learning: The Two Faces of R & D,” Economic Journal. Vol. 99, pp. 569–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1990a). “The Implications of Spillovers for R & D Investment and Welfare: A New Perspective,” Administrative Science Ouarterly. Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 128–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1990b). “The Implications of Spillovers for R & D Investment and Welfare: A New Perspective,” in: A. N. Link (Ed.). Advances in Applied Micro-Economics, Vol. 5, pp. 29–45. London, JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bondt, R., P. Slaets and B. Cassiman (1992). “The Degree of Spillovers and the Number of Rivals for Maximum Effective R & D,” International Journal of Industrial Or2anization. Vol. 10, pp. 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierkes, M. and U. Hoffmann, Eds. (1992). New Technology at the Outset - Social Forces in the Shaping of Technological Innovations. Frankfurt, Campus/Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1988). “A General Model of R & D Competition and Policy,” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 19, No. 3, S. 317–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G. (1988). “Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation,” Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 26, pp. 1120–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F.M. (1989). “Games Economists Play: An Noncooperative View,” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 20, No. 1, S. 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F.M. (1991). “Organizing Industrial Organisazion: Reflections on the Handbook of Industrial Organization”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, S. 201–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F.M. und P.Temin (1973). “Returns to Scale in Research and Development: What does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis Imply?” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, S. 56–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M. (1991). “Die Übernahme neuer Techniken durch Industriebetriebe,” Ifo-Studien S. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallini, N.T. (1992). “Patent Policy and Costly Imitation,” RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 23, No. 1, S. 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, S. (1992). “Innovation, Firm Size and Growth in a centralized Organisation”, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 23, No. 2, S. 284–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1991). “Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey,” Journal of Economic Literature. Vol. 28, No. 4, S. 1661–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1979). “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth,” Bell Journal of Economics. Vol. 10, pp. 92–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1992). “The Search for R & D Spillovers,” mimeo, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grupp, H. und Schmoch, U. (1992). Wissenschaftsbindung der Technik - Panorama der internationalen Entwicklung und sektorales Tableau für Westdeutschland. Heidelberg: Physika-Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D. (1991). Strategic Spillover Production, Vertical Organization, and Incentives for Research and Development. Unveröffentlichte Ph.D.-Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. (1990). “Underinvestment and Incompetence as Responses to Radical Innovation: Evidence from the Photolithographic Alignment Equipment Industry,” Discussion Paper No. 3163–90 BPS, Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. and I. Cockburn (1992). “Scale, Scope and Spillovers: Research Strategy and Research Productivity in the Pharmaceutical Industry,” Discussion Paper, Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R., A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg (1991). “Basicness, Appropriability and Agglomeration Effects in the Generation of New Knowledge: A Comparison of University and Corporate Research with the Aid of Patent Data,” Discussion Paper, Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. M. and K. B. Clark (1990). “Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms,” Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hippel, Eric von (1989). The Sources of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom B.R. and J. Tirole (1989). “The Theory of the Firm”, in: R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig (Ed.). Handbook of Industrial Economics, Vol. 1, S. 61–133. Amsterdam, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, O. und C. Spengel (1992). “Unternehmensbesteuerung und Finanzierung–Eine vergleichende Analyse der Besteuerungskonzeptionen für Kapitalgesellschaften in Deutschland, Frankreich und Großbritannien”, ZEW Discussion Paper Nr. 92–03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B. (1986). “Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R & D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profits, and Market Value,” American Economic Review. Vol. 76, No. 5, pp. 984–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. B. (1988). “Demand and Supply Influences in R & D Intensity and Productivity Growth,” Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 431–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A. (1989a). “Characterizing the ‘technological position’ of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers,” Research Policy. Vol. 18, pp. 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. (1988a). “Information Capacity and Innovation Adoption”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 6, S. 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, R. (1988b). “hnformation Cost and Innovation Adoption Capacitiy” Management Science, Vol. 34, S. 230–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorde, T. M. and D. J. Treece (1990). “Innovation and Cooperation: Implications for Competition and Antitrust”, Journal of Economic Perspectives Vol. 4, Number 3, S. 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A. (1989). “Firm Size and Innovations: Observations in Dutch Manufacturing Industry”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 1, S. 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König, H. und K. F. Zimmermann (1986). “Innovations, Market Structure and Market Dynamics,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. Vol. 142, S. 184199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, David M. (1991). A Course in Microeconomic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. C., W. M. Cohen and D. C. Mowery (1985). “R & D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses,” AEA Papers and Proceedings. Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 20–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. C., A. K. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson and S. G. Winter (1987). “Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. pp. 783–820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, R. C. and P. C. Reiss (1988). “Cost-Reducing and Demand-Creating R & D with Spillovers,” Rand Journal of Economics. Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 538–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, F. (1987). “The Effect of Government Funding on Private Industrial Research and Development: A Reassessment,” Journal of Industrial Economics. Vol. 36, pp. 551–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg, F. (1988). “The Private R & D Investment Response to Federal Design and Technical Competititons,” American Economic Review. Vol. 78, pp. 550–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E. (1985). “How Rapidly Does New Industrial Technology Leak Out?,” Journal of Industrial Economics. Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mairaisse, J. und M. Sassenou (1991). “R & D and Productivity: A Survey of Econometric Studies at the Firm Level,” NBER Working Paper. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1984). “Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy und a Theory,” Research Policy. Vol. 13, No. 6, S. 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, J. F. (1981). “Dynamic Games of Innovation,” Journal of Economic Theory. Vol. 25, pp. 21–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinganum, J. F. (1989). “The Timing of Innovation: Research, Development, und Diffusion,” in: R. Schmalensee und R. D. Willig (Ed.). Handbook of Industrial Organization, Vol. 1, pp. 849–908. Amsterdam, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Frederic M. (1992). “Schumpeter and Plausible Capitalism”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 30, No. 3, S. 1416–1433

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbach, J. und K. F. Zimmermann (1991a). “A Poisson Model of Patenting and Firm Structure in Germany”, in: Acs, Z. und D. Audretsch (Hrsg.), Innovation and Technical Change. An International Comparison, New York. S. 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbach, J. und K. F. Zimmermann (1991b). “Determinanten der Patentaktivität”, IfoStudien, Vol. 37, S. 201–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. (1989a). “The Theory of Business Behavior”, RAND Journal of Economics, Vol. 20, No. 1, S. 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, C. (1989b). “Theories of Oligopoly Behavior”, in: R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig (Ed.). Handbook of Industrial Economics, Vol. 1, S. 329–413. Amsterdam, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and Economic Growth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. A. (1984). “Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance,” Econometrica. Vol. 52, pp. 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. (1990). Sunk Costs und Market Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Tirole, J. (1988). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trajtenberg, M. (1990). “A Penny for your Quotes: Patent Citations und the Value of Innovations,” RAND Journal of Economics. Vol. 21, No. 1, S. 172–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weizsäcker, C. C. v. (1980). Barriers to Entry - A Theoretical Treatment. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, S. G. (1984). “Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes,” Journal of Economic Behavior und Organization. Vol. 5, S. 287–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt, Ulrich (1987). Individualistische Grundlagen der evolutorischen Ökonomik. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mannheim, Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), Kaiserring 14-16, 6800, Mannheim 1, Deutschland

    Dietmar Harhoff & Heinz König

Authors
  1. Dietmar Harhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heinz König
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fraunhofer-Instituts für Systemtechnik und Innovationsforschung (ISI), Breslauer Straße 45, D-76139, Karlsruhe, Deutschland

    Frieder Meyer-Krahmer (Leiter) (Leiter)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harhoff, D., König, H. (1993). Neuere Ansätze der Industrieökonomik — Konsequenzen für Eine Industrie- und Technologiepolitik. In: Meyer-Krahmer, F. (eds) Innovationsökonomie und Technologiepolitik. Technik, Wirtschaft und Politik, vol 1. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12072-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12072-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0689-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-12072-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation