Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Neuere Ansätze in der Innovationstheorie und der Theorie des Technischen Wandels — Konsequenzen für Eine Industrie- und Technologiepolitik

  • Conference paper
Innovationsökonomie und Technologiepolitik

Part of the book series: Technik, Wirtschaft und Politik ((TECH.WIRTSCHAFT,volume 1))

Zusammenfassung

Versucht man die Wurzeln des Wohlstands der industrialisierten Volkswirtschaften des Westens zu bestimmen, so findet man im engeren Kreis der Wachstumsdeterminanten ohne Zweifel die Faktoren Technologie, technischer Fortschritt, Produktivität und Strukturwandel. Sich das tägliche moderne Leben ohne Technologie vorzustellen, ist nahezu unmöglich. Vor der Jahrhundertwende noch wurde das Wirtschaftswachstum hauptsächlich durch den Mehreinsatz der Inputfaktoren Kapital und Arbeit (Solow-Wachstum) und durch eine intensivere Arbeitsteilung auf nationaler wie auch internationaler Ebene (Smith-Wachstum) gespeist. Heutzutage hingegen zeichnen zu einem Großteil die beinahe unendlichen Möglichkeiten des technischen Fortschritts für die Wohlstandsentwicklung von Gesellschaften verantwortlich (Schumpeter-Wachstum).

Wir danken Jürgen Ewers, Frieder Meyer-Krahmer sowie den Teilnehmern des Workshops „Kann die Technologiepolitik von der lnnovationsökonomie lernen? — Theoretische Ansätze, empirische Evidenz, offene Forschungsfragen“, Wissenschaftszentrum Bonn, 17./18. September 1992, für kritische Anmerkungen und hilfreiche Anregungen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • ALLEN, R.C., (1983), Collective Invention, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, Vol. 4, 1983, S. 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARROW, K.J., (1962), The Economic Implications of Learning By Doing, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 29, S. 155–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ARTHUR, W.B., (1990), Positive Feedback Mechanisms in the Economy, Scientific American, February 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATKINSON, A., and J. STIGLITZ, (1969), A new view of technical change, Economic Journal, Vol. 79, 1969, S. 573–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AXELROD, R., (1989), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARLSSON, B. (ed.) (1989), Industrial Dynamics, Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARLSSON, B., (1992), Technological Systems and Economic Development Potential: Four Swedish Case Studies, Paper presented at the International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society Conference, Kyoto, Japan, August 19–22, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARLSSON, B., and R. STANKIEWICZ, (1991), On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological Systems, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Vol. 1 (2), 1991, S. 93–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COHEN, W., and D. LEVINTHAL, (1989), Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R and D, Economic Journal, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • CUSUMANO, M.A., Y. MYLONADIS and R.R. ROSENBLOOM, (1990), Strategic Maneuvering and Mass-Market Dynamics: The Triumph of VHS over Beta, CCC-Working Paper #90–5, University of California at Berkeley, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • DASGUPTA, P., (1987), The Economic Theory of Technology Policy: An Introduction, in: DASGUPTA/STONEMAN (1987), S. 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • DASGUPTA, P., and E. MASKIN, The Simple Economics of Research Portfolios, Economic Journal, Vol. 97, 1987, S. 581–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DASGUPTA, P., and J. STIGLITZ, (1980), Uncertainty, Industrial Structure, and the Speed of R, and D, Bell Journal of Economics, 1980, S. 266–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • DASGUPTA, P., and P. STONEMAN, (1987), Economic Policy and Technological Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DAVID, P.A., (1985), Clio and the Economics of QWERTY, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), Vol. 75, 1985, S. 332–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOSI, G., (1982), Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories, Research Policy, Vol. 11, 1982, S. 147–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOSI, G., (1984), Technical Change and Industrial Transformation, London: Macmillan, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOSI, G., (1988a), The Nature of the Innovative Process, in: DOSI, G., et al., ( 1988 ), S. 221–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOSI, G., (1988b), Institutions and markets in a dynamic world, The Manchester School, May 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOSI, G., C. FREEMAN, R. NELSON, G. SILVERBERG and L. SOETE, (1988) Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter Publishers, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • DRANKAKIS, E.M., and E.S. PHELPS, (1966), A Model of Induced Invention, Growth and Distribution, Economic Journal, Vol. 76, 1966, S. 823–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FREEMAN, C., (1988), Japan: A New National System of Innovation?, in: DOSI, G., et al. ( 1988 ), S. 330–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • FREEMAN, C., (1992), The Economics of Hope, London, New York: Pinter Publishers, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • FREEMAN, C., and C. PEREZ, (1986), The Diffusion of Technical Innovation and Changes of Technoeconomic Paradigm, paper presented at Conference on Innovation Diffusion, Venice, 17–21 March, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • FREEMAN, C., and C. PEREZ, (1988), Structural Crises of Adjustment: Business Cycles and Investment Behaviour, in: DOSI, G., et al., ( 1988 ), S. 38–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • FREEMAN, C., and L. SOETE (eds.), (1990), New Explorations in the Economics of Technological Change, London, and New York: Pinter Publishers, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOWDY, J.M., (1991), New Controversies in Evolutionary Biology: Lessons for Economists?, Methodus, Vol. 3 (1), 1991, S. 86–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOWDY, J.M., (1992), Higher selection processes in evolutionary economic change, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 2 (no.1), 1992, S. 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMAI, K., and Y. BABA (1989), Systemic innovation and cross-border networks: transcending market and hierarchies to create a new techno-economic system, OECD. Conference on Science, Technology and Growth, Paris, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMAI, K., and A. YAMAZAKI, (1992), Dynamics of the Japanese Industrial System from a Schumpeterian Perspective, Paper presented at the International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society Conference, Kyoto, Japan, August 19–22, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • KENNEDY, C., (1964), Induced Bias in Innovation and the Theory of Distribution, Economic Journal, Vol. 74, 1964, S. 541–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KITCH, E., (1977), The Nature and Function of the Patent System, Journal of Law and Economics, October, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • KUHN, T.S., (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEVHARI, D., (1966a), Further Implications of “Learning By Doing”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 33, S. 31–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEVHARI, D., (1966b), Extensions of “Arrow’s Learning By Doing”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 33, S. 117–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LEVIN, R., A.K. KLEVERIK, R.R. NELSON and S. WINTER, (1987), Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 3, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • LEVIN, R., and P. REISS, (1988), Cost Reducing and Demand - Creating R, and D with Spillovers, RAND Journal of Economics, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • LUCAS, R., (1988), On the Mechanics of Economic Development, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 22, 1988, S. 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LUNDVALL, B.-A., (1988), Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation, in: DOSI, G., et al. ( 1988 ), S. 349–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • MANSFIELD, E., M. SCHWARTZ and S. WAGNER, (1981), Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study, Economic Journal, December, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARQUIS, D.G., and S. MYERS, (1969), Successful Industrial Innovations, Washington: National Science Foundation, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOHR, H., Biologie und Ökonomik - Chancen für eine Interdisziplinaritât, in: WITT, U. (ed.) (1990) Studien zur Evolutorischen Ökonomik 1, Berlin: Duncker, and Humblot, 1990, S. 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • MOWERY, D., and N. ROSENBERG, (1979), The Influence of Market Demand upon Innovation: a Critical Review of some Recent Empirical Studies, Research Policy, vol. 8, 1979, S. 102–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOWERY, D., (1989), Collaborative ventures between US and foreign manufacturing firms, Research Policy, vol. 18 (1), 1989, S. 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NELSON, R.R., (1988), Institutions Supporting Technical Change in the United States, in: DOSI, G., et al. ( 1988 ), S. 312–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • NELSON, R.R., (1990), What is Public and What is Private about Technology?, CCC Working Paper #90–9, University of California at Berkeley, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • NELSON, R.R. and D. NORMAN, (1977), Technological Change and Factor-Mix over the Product Cycle: A Model of Dynamic Comparative Advantage, Journal of Development Economics, vol. 4, 1977, S. 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NELSON, R.R., and S.G. WINTER, (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Boston, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • PROSI, G., (1980), Entspricht der Patentschutz noch den Wettbewerbserfordernissen?, Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb, Vol. 30 (10), S. 641–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROMER, P.M., (1986), Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, S. 1002–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROMER, P.M., (1987a), Crazy Explanations for the Productivity Slowdown, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROMER, P.M., (1987b), Growth based on Increasing Return due to Specialization, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), Vol. 77, S. 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROMER, P.M., (1990a), Endogenous Technological Change, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98 (5), 1990, S. S71–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ROMER, P.M., (1990b), Are Nonconvexities Important for Understanding Growth?, American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), Vol. 80 (2), 1990, S. 97103.

    Google Scholar 

  • ROSENBERG, N., (1976), Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ROSENBERG, N., (1982), Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAHAL, D., (1981), Patterns of Technological Innovation, New York: Addison Wesley, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAHAL, D., (1985), Technology Guide-posts and Innovation Avenues, Research Policy, Vol. 14 (2), 1985, S. 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAXONHOUSE, G. (1974), A state of Japanese technological diffusion in the Meiji-period, Journal of Economic History, vol. 34, S. 149–65, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SCHMOOKLER, J., (1966), Invention and Economic Growth, Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHNABL, H., (1990), Biologische Evolution vs. Evolution von Firmen und Märkten - Ein Vergleich, in: WITT, U., ( 1990 ), S. 221–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHUMPETER, J.A., (1912), Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung,Duncker, and Humblot: München and Leipzig, 19354.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCHUMPETER, J.A., (1942), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, London: Un-win, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHAW, G.K., (1992), Policy Implications of Endogenous Growth Theory, Economic Journal, Vol. 102, 1992, S. 611–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SHELL, K. ed., (1967), Essays on the Theory of Optimal Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: Mit Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHESHINSKI, E., (1967), Optimal Accumulation with Learning By Doing, in: SHELL, K. ed., (1967). Essays on the Theory of Optimal Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: Mit Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • SILVERBERG, G., (1990), Adoption and Diffusion of Technology as a Collective Evolutionary Process, in: FREEMAN, C., and L. SOETE (eds.), 1990, S. 17792.

    Google Scholar 

  • SOETE, L., and R. TURNER, (1984), Technological Diffusion and the Rtae of Technical Change, Economic Journal, Vol. 94, 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SOLOW, R., (1956), A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 70, 1956, S. 65–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STIGLITZ, J., (1987), Learning to Learn, Localized Learning and Technological Progress, in: DASGUPTA/STONEMAN (1987), S. 125–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • STREIT, M.E., (1991), Theorie der Wirtschaftspolitik,Düsseldorf: Werner-Verlag, 19914.

    Google Scholar 

  • STREIT, M.E., (1992), Am Beginn einer Europäischen Industriepolitik, Volkswirt- schaftliche Korrespondenz der Adolf-Weber-Stiftung, 31.Jhrg., 1992, Nr. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • VON HIPPEL, E., (1989), Cooperation between rivals: informal know-how trading, in: CARLSSON, B. (ed.) (1989). Industrial Dynamics, Boston, Dordrecht, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEIZSÄCKER, C.C.v., (1966), Tentative Notes on a Two Sector Model with Induced Technical Progress, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 33, 1966, S. 245–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WITT, U., (1987), How Transaction Rights are shaped to Channel Innovativeness?, Zeitschrift for die gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 143, S. 180–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • WITT, U., (1990), Studien zur Evolutorischen Ökonomik I, Berlin: Duncker, and Humblot, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lehrstuhl für VWL V, Universität Augsburg, Memminger Straße 14, 8900, Augsburg, Deutschland

    Horst Hanusch & Uwe Cantner

Authors
  1. Horst Hanusch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Uwe Cantner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fraunhofer-Instituts für Systemtechnik und Innovationsforschung (ISI), Breslauer Straße 45, D-76139, Karlsruhe, Deutschland

    Frieder Meyer-Krahmer (Leiter) (Leiter)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hanusch, H., Cantner, U. (1993). Neuere Ansätze in der Innovationstheorie und der Theorie des Technischen Wandels — Konsequenzen für Eine Industrie- und Technologiepolitik. In: Meyer-Krahmer, F. (eds) Innovationsökonomie und Technologiepolitik. Technik, Wirtschaft und Politik, vol 1. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12072-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12072-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0689-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-12072-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation