Advertisement

The public-private sector wage gap in Zambia in the 1990s: A quantile regression approach

  • Helena Skyt Nielsen
  • Michael Rosholm
Chapter
  • 535 Downloads
Part of the Studies in Empirical Economics book series (STUDEMP)

Abstract

We investigate the determinants of wages in Zambia and based on the quantile regression approach, we analyze how their effects differ at different points in the wage distribution and over time. We use three cross-sections of Zambian household data from the early nineties, which was a period of economic transition, because items as privatization and deregulation were on the political agenda. The focus is placed on the public-private sector wage gap, and the results show that this gap was relatively favorable for the low-skilled and less favorable for the high-skilled. This picture was further strengthened during the periosd 1991–1996.

Key words

Quantile regression public-private wage differential Zambia. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersson P-Å, Kayizzi-Mugerwa S (1993) External shocks and the search for diversification in zambia. In: Blomström M. Lundahl M (eds.) Economic Crisis in Africa: Perspectives on Policy Responses. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Bratton M (1994) Economic crisis and political realignment in zambia. In: Widner JA (ed.) Economic Change and Political Liberalization in Sub-Saharan Africa. Johns Hopkins UP, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchinsky M (1994) Changes in the U.S. wage structure 1963–1987: Application of quantile regression. Econometrica 62: 405–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchinsky M (1995) Quantile regression, Box-Cox transformation model and the U.S. wage structure, 1963–1987. Journal of Econometrics 65: 109–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buchninsky M (1998) Recent advances in quantile regression models: A practical guideline for empirical research. Journal of Human Resources 33: 88–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Central Statistical Office (1993) Social dimensions of adjustment, priority survey I - 1991. Report. Central Statistical Office, Lusaka, ZambiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Central Statistical Office (1994) Social dimensions of adjustment, priority survey II - 1993. Tabulation Report. Central Statistical Office, Lusaka, ZambiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Central Statistical Office (1996) Living conditions monitoring survey I-1996: discover the power of statistics. Central Statistical Office, Lusaka, ZambiaGoogle Scholar
  9. Disney R, Gosling A (1998) Does it pay to work in the public sector? Fiscal Studies 19: 347–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Economist Intelligence Unit (1999), Country Profile: Zambia 1998–99Google Scholar
  11. Fitzenberger B (1999) Wages and employment across skill groups: An analysis for west germany. Physica-Verlag, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IMF (1997) IMF staff country report No. 97/118, selected issues and statistical appendix. IMF, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  13. Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46: 33–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Psacharopoulos G (1994) Returns to investment in education: A global update. World Development 22: 1325–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. World Bank (1996) Prospects for sustainable growth 1995–2005. Report No. 15477-ZA. World Bank, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  16. World Bank (1998) Zambia at a glance. World Bank homepageGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helena Skyt Nielsen
    • 1
  • Michael Rosholm
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsAarhus School of BusinessAarhus VDenmark
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Aarhus Building 350Aarhus CDenmark

Personalised recommendations