Skip to main content

Quantile regression with sample selection: Estimating women’s return to education in the U.S.

  • Chapter
Economic Applications of Quantile Regression

Part of the book series: Studies in Empirical Economics ((STUDEMP))

Abstract

This study uses quantile regression techniques to analyze changes in the returns to education for women. The data used is the March Current Population Survey for the years 1968, 1973, 1979, 1986 and 1990. The first step in estimating the single (linear) index selection equation uses Ichimura’s (1993) semiparametric procedure. To correct for an unknown form of a sample selection bias in the quantile regression, the second step incorporates a nonparametric method, using an idea similar to one developed by Heckman (1980) and Newey (1991) for mean regression, and Buchinsky (1998) for quantile regression.

The results show that: (a) the returns to education increased enormously for the younger cohorts, but very little for the older cohorts; (b) in general the returns are higher at the lower quantiles in the beginning of the sample period and higher at the higher quantiles by the end of the sample period; (c) there is a significant sample selection bias for all age groups at almost all quantiles; (d) toward the end of the sample period there is a significant convergence of the returns at the various quantiles, especially for the younger cohorts and age groups; and (e) the semiparametric estimates of the selection equation are considerably different from those obtained for a parametric probit model.

This paper was presented at the conference on “Economic Applications of Quantile Regression” held in Konstanz, Germany, June 2000. I wish to thank Don Andrews, Josh Angrist, Claudia Goldin, Jenny Hunt, Larry Katz, Jacob Mincer, Ariel Pakes, Jean-Marc Rubin, John Rust, Steve Stern, Joe Tracy, and Joel Waldfogel, as well as seminar participants in Columbia University, Yale University, University of Montreal, University of Virginia, and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem for comments and discussions. I have benefited greatly from insightful comments on earlier drafts by Gary Chamberlain, Jim Powell, James Heckman, Roger Koenker, Bernd Fitzenberger, and an anonymous referee. I am, nonetheless, fully responsible for any remaining errors in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrews DWK, Schafgans M (1998) Semiparametric estimation of a sample selection model. Review of Economic Studies 65: 497–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn M, Bloom D (1987) Earnings and income inequality in the United States. Population and Development Review 13: 575–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn M, Bloom D, Freeman R (1993) Changes in earning differentials in the 1980’s: Concordance, convergence, causes, and consequences. In Papadimitriou DB, Wolff EN (eds.) Poverty and Prosperity in the USA in the Late Twentieth Century. St. Martin’s Press New York pp. 275–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound J, Johnson G (1992) Changes in the structure of wages during the 1980’s: An evaluation of alternative explanations. American Economic Review 82: 37. 1–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Bound J, Johnson G (1991) Wages in the United States during the 1980’s and beyond. In Kosters M (ed.) Workers and Their Wages ( Washington D.C.: The AEI Press ): 77–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchinsky M (1998) The dynamic of changes in the female wage distribution in the USA: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics 13: 1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchinsky M (1995) Quantile regression box-cox transformation model and changes in the returns to schooling and experience. Journal of Econometrics 65: 109–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchinsky M (1994) Changes in the U.S. wage structure 1963–1987: Application of quantile regression. Econometrica 62: 405–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Card D, Krueger A (1992) Does school quality matter? Returns to education and the character- istics of public schools in the United States. The Journal of Political Economy 100: 1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain G (1994) Quantile regression, censoring, and the structure of wage. In Sims C (ed.) Advances in Econometrics: Sixth World Congress. Cambridge University Press, New York, Vol. I, pp. 171–209

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Craven P, Wahba G (1979) Smoothing noisy data with spline functions. Numerische Mathematik 31: 377–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis S, Haltiwanger J (1991) Wage dispersion between and within U.S. manufacturing plants 1962–1986. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics: 115–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin C (1990) Understanding the gender gap: An economic history of American women. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronau R (1974) Wage comparison — A selectivity bias. The Journal of Political Economy 82: 1119–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J (1990) Varieties of sample selection bias. American Economic Review 80: 313–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J (1980) Sample selection bias as a specification error. In Stromsdorfer E, Farkas G (eds.) Evaluation Studies, Review Annual 5. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 61–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47:153–161 Heckman J, Honoré B (1990) The empirical content of the roy model. Econometrica 58: 1121–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman J, Robb R (1985) Alternative methods for estimating the impact of interventions. In Heckman J, Singer B (eds.) Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 156–245

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ichimura H (1993) Semiparametric least squares (SLS) and weighted SLS estimation of single-index models. Journal of Econometrics 58: 71–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juhn C, Murphy K, Pierce P (1993) Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill. The Journal of Political Economy 101: 410–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz L, Murphy K (1992) Changes in the relative wages 1963–87: Supply and demand factors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 35–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein R, Spady R (1993) An efficient semiparametric estimator of the binary response model. Econometrica 61: 387–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46: 33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy F, Murnane R (1992) U.S. earnings levels and earnings inequality: A review of recent trends and proposed explanation. Journal of Economic Literature 30: 1333–1381

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer J (1974) Schooling experience and earnings. NBER, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mroz T (1987) The sensitivity of an empirical model of married women’s hours of work to economic and statistical assumptions. Econometrica 55: 765–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K, Welch F (1992) The structure of wages. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 107: 285–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K, Welch F (1991) The role of international trade in wage differentials. In Kosters M (ed.) Workers and Their Wages. The AEI Press, Washington D.C, pp. 39–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K, Welch F (1990) Empirical age-earning profiles. Journal of Labor Economics 8: 202–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey W (1991) Two step series estimation of sample selection model. Unpublished manuscript, MIT

    Google Scholar 

  • Newey W, Powell J, Walker J (1990) Semiparametric estimation of selection models: Some empirical results. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings 80: 324–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell J, Stock J, Stoker T (1989) Semiparametric estimation of index coefficients. Econometrica 57: 1435–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Buchinsky, M. (2002). Quantile regression with sample selection: Estimating women’s return to education in the U.S.. In: Fitzenberger, B., Koenker, R., Machado, J.A.F. (eds) Economic Applications of Quantile Regression. Studies in Empirical Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-11592-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-11592-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2502-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-11592-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics