Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dialysemethoden

  • Chapter
Book cover Dialyseshunts

  • 25 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Mit zunehmender technischer Lösung der Probleme des Gefäßzuganges, der Antikoagulation, der Effizienz und Biokompatibilität der Dialysatoren sowie der Aufbereitung und Pufferung der Dialyselösungen ist die Hämodialyse in den letzten 35 Jahren zu einem ausgereiften, sicheren und auch für alte und schwerkranke Patienten gut verträglichen Verfahren geworden (4). Es gibt heute in Europa etwa 500, in den USA 500 chronische Hämodialysepatienten pro Million Einwohner. Eine Hämodialyse-Behandlung dauert je nach Restnierenfunktion und Gewicht des Patienten sowie Höhe der Retentionswerte 3 bis 6, im Durchschnitt 4 Stunden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Bergström J (1995) Nutrition and mortality in hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 6: 1329–1341

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. D’Amico G (1993) ComChapaubility of the different registries on renal replacement therapy. Am J Kidney Dis 25:113–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feldman HI, Held PJ, Hutchinson JT, Stoiber E, Hartigan MF, Berlin JA (1993) Hemodialysis vascular access morbidity in the united states. Kidney Int 43:1091–1091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Franz HE (1996) Blutreinigungsverfahren. 5Aufl., Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hakim RM, Lazarus JM (1995) Initiation of Dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 6:1319–1328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hakim RM, Wingard RL, Parker RA (1994) Effect of the dialysis membrane in the treatment of patients with acute renal failure. N Engl J Med 344:1338–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hakim RM, Breyer J, Ismali N, Schulmann G (1995) Effects of dose of dialysis on morbidity and mortality. Am J Kidney Dis 23:661–669

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keller F, Loewe HJ, Bauknecht KJ, Schwarz A, Offermann G (1988) Kumulative Funktionsraten von orthotopen Dialysefisteln und Interponaten. Dtsch Med Wschr 113: 332–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lowrie EG (1994) Chronic dialysis treatment: Clinical outcome and related processes of care. Am J Kidney Dis 24:255–266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Prischi FC, Wallner M, Berent R, Lenglinger F, Kramar R (1995) Urokinase-Lyse von thrombotisch verschlossenen zentralvenösen Kathetern zur Aufrechterhaltung der Katheterfunktion bei Hämodialysepatienten. Nieren- und Hochdruckkrankheiten 24: 319–323

    Google Scholar 

  11. Owen CH, Cummings RS, Sell TL, Schwab SJ, Jones RH, Glower DD (1994) Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with dialysis-dependent renal failure. Ann Thorac Surg 58:1729–1733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schiffl H, Lang SM, König A, Strasser T, Haider MC, Held E (1994) Biocompatible membranes in acute renal failure: prospective case-controlled study. Lancet 344: 570–572

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schiffl H, Sitter T, Lang S, König A, Haider M, Held E (1995) Bioincompatible membranes place patients with acute renal failure at increased risk of infection. ASAIO Journal 41:M709–M712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bloembergen WE, Port FK, Mauger EA, Wolfe RA (1995) A comparison of mortality between patients treated with hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 6:177–183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Canadian Institute for Health Information (1995) Canadian Organ Replacement Register, 1993. Annual Report. Don Mills, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  16. Churchill DN, Taylor DW, Keshaviah PR (1996) Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: association with clinical outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol 7: 198–207

    Google Scholar 

  17. Diaz-Buxo JA (1989) Current status of continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis (CCPD). Perit Dial Int 9:9–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fenton SS, Schaubel DE, Desmeules M, Morrison HI, Mao Y, Copleston P, Jeffery JR, Kjellstrand CM (1997) Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a comparison of adjusted mortality rates. Am J Kidney Dis 30:334–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gentil MA, Cariazzo A, Pavon MI, Rosado M, Castillo D, Ramos B, Algarra GR, Teju-ca F, Banasco VP, Milan JA (1991) Comparison of survival in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a multicenter study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 6:444–451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gokal R (1993) Quality of life in patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. Kidney Int (Suppl 40): 23–27

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grützmacher P, Tsobanelis T, Bruns M, Kurz P, Hoppe D, Vlachojannis J (1993) Decrease in peritonitis rate by integrated disconnect system in patients on CAPD. Perit Dial Int (Suppl 2): 326–328

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jindal KK, Hirsch DJ (1994) Excellent technique survival on home peritoneal dialysis: results of a regional program. Perit Dial Int 14:324–326

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Keane WF, Alexander SR, Bailie GR, Boeschoten E, Gokal R, Golper TA, Holmes CJ, Huang CC, Kawaguchi Y, Piraino B, Riella M, Schaefer F, Vas SI (1996) Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis treatment recommendations: 1996 Update. Perit Dial Int 16: 557–573

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lameire NH, Vanholder R, Veyt D (1992) A longitudinal, five year survey of urea kinetic Chapaumeters in CAPD patients. Kidney Int 42:426–432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Maiorca R, Vonesh EF, Cavalli PL, De Vecchi A, Giangrande A, La Greca G, Scarpioni LL, Bragantini L, Cancarini GC, Cantaluppi A, Castelnovo C, Castiglioni A, Poisetti P, Viglino G (1991) A multicenter selection-adjusted comparison of patient and technique survivals on CAPD and hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 11:118–127

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Maiorca R, Cancarini GC, Brunori G, Camerini C, Manili L (1993) Morbidity and mortality of CAPD and hemodialysis. Kidney Int (Suppl 40): S4–S15

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maiorca R, Cancarini GC, Zubani R, Camerini C, Manili L, Brunori G, Movilli E (1996) CAPD viability: a long-term comparison with hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 16:276–287

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nolph KD (1988) Comparison of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis. Kidney Int (Suppl 4): 123–131

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nolph KD (1996) Why are reported relative risks for CAPD and HD so variable? Perit Dial Int 16:15–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Port FK, Held PJ, Nolph KD, Truenne MN, Wolfe RA (1992) Risk of peritonitis and technique failure by CAPD connection technique: A national study. Kidney Int 42: 967–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sitter T, Krautz B, Held E, Schiffl H (1997) Patientenüberleben, Methodenwechsel und Hospitalisierung bei CAPD und Hämodialyse. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 122:109–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Teehan BP, Schleifer CR, Brown JM, Sigler MH, Raimondo J (1990) Urea kinetic analysis and clinical outcome on CAPD: a five-year longitudinal study. Adv Perit Dial 6 : 181–185

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wanner C (1993) Störungen des Lipidstoffwechsels bei der Peritonealdialyse. Mitt Klin Nephrologie XXII: 105–115

    Google Scholar 

  34. Young GA, Kopple JD, Lindholm B, Vonesh EF, De Vecchi A, Scalamogna A, Castelnova C, Oreopoulos DG, Anderson GH, Bergström J, Dichiro J, Gentile G, Nissenson A, Sakhrani L, Brownjohn AM, Nolph KD, Prowani BE, Algrim CE, Martis L, Serkes KD (1991) Nutritional assessment of CAPD patients: an international study. Am J Kidney Dis 7:462–471

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. J. Silomon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Keller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Wilfling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich Gefäßchirurgie, St. Josef-Krankenhaus, Haan, Robert-Koch-Str. 16, 42781, Haan, Deutschland

    W. Hepp

  2. Chirurgische Abteilung, St. Hedwigs-Krankenhaus, Große Hamburger Str. 5-11, 10115, Berlin, Deutschland

    M. Hegenscheid

  3. Köln, Deutschland

    K. Konner

  4. Erfurt, Deutschland

    H. Thieler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Silomon, J., Keller, F., Wilfling, M. (1998). Dialysemethoden. In: Hepp, W., Hegenscheid, M., Konner, K., Thieler, H. (eds) Dialyseshunts. Steinkopff, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-11473-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-11473-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Steinkopff, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-11474-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-11473-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation