I am not going to say no. But I might like to be more careful with that expression, “economic crisis”, than most of the commentators. They tend to take it for granted that there is a crisis, seem to be under no obligation whatsoever to define a term before they indulge in using it, to the point that it takes on a life of its own. It came into life fall 1997, grew rapaciously, has now attained monster status driving people around in a frenzy, till — I have seen this many times — some St. George somewhere stands up and kills the dragon. In no way does that mean that the crisis goes away, only that the term “crisis” has outlived its usefulness. Nobody gets excited any longer, let’s find something new to excite us. No term can hope for more than a couple of years; the life expectancy for most of them is far shorter. Reality has nothing, or very little, to do with it.
KeywordsEconomic Crisis OECD Briton
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Galtung, J. (1971), Social Structure, Education Structure and Life-Long Education: the Case of Japan, in: Ben-David, J., Dore, R., Faure, E. & Reischauer, E. O. (eds.), Reviews of National Policy for Education: Japan,Paris: OECD: 131–152.Google Scholar
- Gattung, J. (1970), Paths of Development: a Diachronic Analysis of Development in Japan,Oslo: PRIO.Google Scholar
- Gattung, J. (1972), Human Resources and Socio-Economic Growth: a Case Study of Japan, in: Gostkowski, Z. (ed.), Toward a System of Human Resources Indicators for Less Developed Countries,Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences: 217–235.Google Scholar
- Galtung, J. (1983), On the Possible Decline and Fall of Japan: The Limits to Transcendence of Contradictions, in: East Asia — International Review of Economic, Political, and Social Development 1,Frankfurt: 1–26.Google Scholar