# The Boundary Element Method applied to Two-Dimensional Contact Problems with Friction

Conference paper
Part of the Boundary Elements book series (BOUNDARY, volume 3)

## Abstract

Contact problems and the study of load transfer in mechanical assemblages are of great importance in mechanical engineering. For nearly one century, since H Hertz (1881) published his famous work on normal contact between elastic bodies, much research has been performed in this area, both theoretical and experimental work. An interesting survey of the mechanics of contact between solid bodies is given by Kalker (1977). He gives an account for the classical formulation of the contact problem as well as for the variational one. The latter has been used especially for numerical calculations, for instance with the finite element method, (FEM). In most contact problems the contact area is a function of the external forces. When friction has to be taken into account, the whole load history has to be followed. Thus when using numerical methods, contact problems have to be solved by iteration and in the frictional case also with incremental technique. A lot of computer time has to be spent which makes it important for the system matrix to be small. When sliding occurs in the contact zone, the normal and tangential forces have to be coupled with a friction parameter. The possibility of coupling the normal- and tangential tractions in the matrix system is an advantage for the Boundary Element Method (BEM) over the displacement FEM. This makes it fruitful to use BEM for solving contact problems with friction.

## Keywords

Contact Pressure Boundary Element Method Contact Problem Elastic Foundation Load Transfer
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## References

1. Andersson, T. (1979) The Boundary Element Method with Application to Contact Mechanics, Linköping Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Report R-135, Linköping. (In Swedish)Google Scholar
2. Andersson, T. (1979) MARCUS*ISOTROPIC, TA*GENERATOR and TA*CONTACT. Computer package for Analysis of Elastostatic, Frictionless Contacts Between Plane Structures-Users Manual, Linköping Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Report R-136, Linköping, (In Swedish)Google Scholar
3. Andersson, T. (1980) “The Boundary Element Method Applied to Two-dimensional Contact Problems”. Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Recent Advances in Boundary Element Methods, Southampton March 1980, Ed. C.A. Brebbia, CML PublicationsGoogle Scholar
4. Argyris, J. H., et al. (1977) ASKA User’s Reference Manual, ISD Report No. 73, Rev. D, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
5. Brebbia, C. A. (1978) The Boundary Element Method for Engineers, Pentech Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
6. Bäcklund, J. and Aronsson, C.G. (1978) Effects of Geometrical Incompatibilities on Stress Intensity Factors Calculated by the Finite Element Method. Proc. First International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fracture Mechanics (eds A. R. Luxmore and D. R. J. Owen), Swansea 9–13 Jan., 1979, pp 281-291Google Scholar
7. Cruse, T. A. (1977) Mathematical Foundation of the Boundary Integral Equation Method in Solid Mechanics, AFOSR-TR-77-1002, Pratt and Whitney Aircraft Group, United Technologies Corporation, East Hartford, Connecticut 06108Google Scholar
8. Fredriksson, B. (1976) Finite Element Solution of Surface Non-linearities in Structural Mechanics, Computers & Structures, 6: 281–290
9. Kalker, J. J. (1977) A Survey of the Mechanics of Contact Between Solid Bodies. ZAMM75, T3-T17Google Scholar
10. Persson, B. G. A. (1964) On the Stress Distribution of Cylindrical Elastic Bodies in Contact. Diss. Chalmers Inst. of Technology, Gothenburg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
11. Rizzo, F. J. (1967) An Integral Equation Approach to Boundary Value Problems of Classical Elastostatics. Q. Appl. Math. 25, pp 83–95