Advertisement

Orientation of Amphibians by Linearly Polarized Light

  • Douglas H. Taylor
  • Jill S. Auburn
Part of the Proceedings in Life Sciences book series (LIFE SCIENCES)

Abstract

Indoor tests of Bullfrog tadpoles and the eft and adult stages of Eastern Red Spotted Newts under linearly polarized light indicate that these two species can perceive the e-vector for spatial orientation. Other tests out of doors, under clear blue skies after sunset, indicate that both species can use the polarization patterns of the natural sky for orientation. Further, outdoor tests of Bullfrog tadpoles after sunset indicate that the reception of linearly polarized light does not reside in the eyes, but probably is associated with the pineal complex.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, K.: Extraocular photoreception of amphibians. Photochem. Photobiol. 23. 275–298 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, K., Taylor, D.H.: Extraocular perception of polarized light by orienting salamanders. J. Comp. Physiol. 87, 203–212 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auburn, J.S., Taylor, D.H.: Polarized light perception and orientation in larval bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. Anim. Behav. (in press) (1977a)Google Scholar
  4. Auburn, J.S., Taylor, D.H.: Extraocular orientation by skylight polarization in larval bullfrogs, submitted for publication (1977b)Google Scholar
  5. Bainbridge, R., Waterman, T.H.: Turbidity and the polarized light orientation of the crustacean Mysidium. J. Exp. Biol. 35, 487–493 (1958)Google Scholar
  6. Batschelet, E.: Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Problems in Animal Orientation and Certain Biological Rhythms. Washington, D.C.: Am, Inst. Biol. Sci. 1965, 57 pp.Google Scholar
  7. Batschelet, E.: Recent statistical methods for orientation data. In: Animal Orientation and Navigation. Galler, S., Schmidt-Koenig, K., Jacobs, G, Belleville, R. (eds.). Washington, D.C: U.S. Govt Bubl. NASA SP-262, 1972, pp. 61-91Google Scholar
  8. Delius, J.D., Perchard, R.J., Emmerton, J.: Polarized light discrimination by pigeons and an electroretinographic correlate. J. Comp. Physiol. 90, 560–571 (1976)Google Scholar
  9. Demian, J., Taylor, D.H.: The pineal gland: the effective extraocular photoreceptor for locomotor rhythm entrainment in the red-spotted newt, Notopthalmus viridescens. J. Herp. 11(2), 131–139 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dill, P.A.: Perception of polarized light by yearling sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. J. Fish. Res. Board. Can. 28, 1319–1322 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Durand, D., Greenwood, J.A.: Modifications of the Rayleigh test for uniformity in analysis of two-dimensional orientation data. J. Geol. 66, 229–238 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferguson, D.E.: The sensory basis of orientation in amphibians. Ann. N.Y, Acad. Sci. 188, 30–36 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferguson, D.E., Landreth, H.F.: Celestial orientation of Fowler’s toad, Bufo fowleri. Behaviour 26, 105–123 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forward, R.B., Jr., Waterman, T.H.: Evidence for e-vector and light intensity pattern discrimination by the teleost Dermogenys. J, Comp. Physiol. 87, 190–202 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frisch, K. von.: The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1967, 566 pp.Google Scholar
  16. Jander, R., Waterman, T.H.: Sensory discrimination between polarized light and light intensity patterns by arthropods. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 56, 137–160 (1960)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Justis, C.S., Taylor, D.H.: Extraocular photoreception and compass orientation in larval bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. Copeia 1976, 98-105 (1976)Google Scholar
  18. Kleerekoper, H., Matis, J.H., Timms, A.M., Gensler, P.: Locomotor response of the goldfish (Carassium auratus) to polarized light and its e-vector, J. Comp. Physiol. 86. 27–36 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kreithen, M.L., Keeton, W.: Detection of polarized light by the homing pigeon, Columba livia. J. Comp. Physiol. 89. 83–92 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Landreth, H.F., Ferguson, D.E.: Newts: sun-compass orientation. Science 158, 1459–1461 (1967)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rozenberg, G.V.: Twilight. A Study in Atmospheric Optics. New York: Plenum Press, 1966, 358 pp.Google Scholar
  22. Taylor, D.H.: Extraoptic photoreception and compass orientation in larval and adult salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum). Anim. Behav. 20. 237–240 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Taylor, D.H., Adler, K.: Spatial orientation by salamanders using planepolarized light. Science 181, 285–287 (1973)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor, D.H., Adler, K.: The pineal body: site of extraocular perception of celestial cues for orientation in the tiger salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum, submitted for publication (1977)Google Scholar
  25. Taylor, D.H., Ferguson, D.E.: Extraoptic orientation in the southern cricket frog, Acris gryllus. Science 168, 390–392 (1970)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Waterman, T.H.: Responses to polarized light: animals. In: Biology Data Book. 2nd ed. Vol. II. (Ed. by Altman, P.L., Dittmer, D.S. (eds.) Bethesda, Md.: Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol., 1973, pp. 1272–1289Google Scholar
  27. Waterman, T.H., Forward, Jr., R.B.: Field demonstration of polarotaxis in the fish Zenarchopterus. J. Exp. Zool. 180. 33–54 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas H. Taylor
    • 1
  • Jill S. Auburn
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyMiami UniversityOxfordUSA

Personalised recommendations