Syria and Turkey in Water Diplomacy (1962–2003)

  • Marwa Daoudy
Chapter

Summary

The complexity of water as a multi-dimensional strategic resource has been extensively highlighted in recent years. Its vital importance is exacerbated in arid and semi-arid regions such as the Middle East. In the case of Syria and Turkey, and at the core of the political and strategic interaction, lie the Euphrates and Tigris waters — the famous Al Furat and Dijleh (Arabic) or Firat and Dicle (Turkish) Rivers. Both rivers have seen the rise of ancient civilizations and the early development of irrigation practices dating back to the Sumerian and Akkadian periods (4000–5000 BC). Meetings have taken place, information on both sides has been exchanged over more than forty years, and experts have established a water-related modus vivendi based on bilateral agreements. This relationship has evolved over the years depending on the regional context, the strategies that were deployed and the link between the water dispute and wider strategic issues. Our purpose will be to analyze bilateral dynamics while highlighting context-related linkages and the importance of water for each actor. We will consider the core problem (the disputed sharing of common water resources in the Euphrates Basin) through the optic of Syria and Turkey’s historical and political interaction, within a range between cooperation and non-cooperation. The minutes of proceedings of the negotiation rounds held between 1962 and 1993 —which have been gathered from the Syrian part-will serve as primary sources for the analysis of face-to-face official positions and exchange of information. These documents constitute an important source of information since they were not formulated in order to sway public opinion, and since their validity has been confirmed by the signature of Turkish negotiators at the time.

Keywords

Migration Europe Syria Turkey Gypsum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahmad K (2001) UK Drops Turkish Dam Plan. In: The Observer 1 JulyGoogle Scholar
  2. Al Hayat (2001) GreenPeace Reveals Water Pollution from Turkey to Syria (in Arabic). 15 AugustGoogle Scholar
  3. Al Mustaqbal (1999) Israel in the GAP (in Arabic). 12 October, p. 15Google Scholar
  4. Allan JA (2000) The Middle East Water Question, Hydropolitics and the Global Economy. I. B. Tauris & Co.Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. An-Nahar (2002) A Syrian-Turkish Project of Agreement around Hydraulic Cooperation and Exchange of Expertise (in Arabic). 21 JuneGoogle Scholar
  6. Bagis AI (1994) Water in the Region: Potential and Prospects — An Overview. In: Bagis AI (ed) Water as an element of Cooperation and Development in the Middle East. Hacettepe University of Ankara and Friedrich Naumann Foundation, Ankara, pp 15 - 27Google Scholar
  7. Bari Z (1977) The Syrian-Iraqi Dispute over the Euphrates Waters. In: International Studies vol 16 no 2: pp 227 - 244Google Scholar
  8. Bayramoglu A (2001) Southeast of Turkey is Victim of Forced Rural Exodus. In: Sabah ( in Turkish ). Translated by Vanrie P Turkish Press Review, European Institute for Euro-Arab and Mediterranean Research and Cooperation., http://www.medea.be/site.html?/site.html? Google Scholar
  9. Beaumont P (1978) The Euphrates River, an International Problem of Water Resources Development. Water Resources Development vol 5 no 1. pp 35 - 43Google Scholar
  10. Bell A (1998) Turkey Turns Down Water Talks with Syrians. CNN Interactive, 15 October Biegala E ( 2001 ) Mixed Blessings From GAP Project for Turkey’s Southeast. In: Turkey Update, http://www.turkeyupdate.com/features/gap.html Google Scholar
  11. Bilen 0 (1994) Prospects for Technical Cooperation in the Euphrates-Tigris Basin. In: Biswas A (ed) International Waters in the Middle East, From Euphrates-Tigris to Nile. Oxford University Press, Delhi, pp 95 - 116Google Scholar
  12. Bosshard P (1998) Ilisu. Bern Declaration, Switzerland, http://www.rivernet.org/turquie/ilisu.htm Google Scholar
  13. Can-Brown J (2001) Blair in Drive for Turkish Dam Deal. Sunday Times 28 OctoberGoogle Scholar
  14. Chalaby H, Majzoub T (1995) Turkey, the Waters of the Euphrates and Public International Law. In: Allan JA, Mallat C (eds) Water in the Middle East, Legal, Political and Commercial Implications. Tauris Academic Studies, London, p. 211Google Scholar
  15. Council of Europe (2002) Humanitarian Situation of the Displaced Kurdish Population of Turkey. Report by the Commission on Migrations, Refugees and Demography of the Parliamentary Assembly, http://assembly.coe.int/Documents/WorkingDocs/Doc02/FDOC9391.htm Google Scholar
  16. Council of Europe (2001) Ultural Aspects of the Project Relating to Ilisu Dam, Turkey. Report by the Commission on Culture, Science and Education of the Parliamentary Assembly, http://assembly.coe.int/Documents/WorkingDocs/Doc01/FDOC9301.htm Google Scholar
  17. Daoud M (1999) Personal Communication to the author (former member of Syrian delegation to the Tripartite Sessions). Ministry of Irrigation, Damascus, 28 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  18. Daoudy M (1999) Water, Institutions and Development in Syria: A Downstream Perspective from the Euphrates and Tigris. World Commission on Dams, Cairo, http://www.dams.org/submissions/sub_p_af4.htm Google Scholar
  19. Daoudy M (1996) Entre le Tigre et l’Euphrate, une négociation en eaux troubles. Les Cahiers de l’Orient 44: pp 73 - 95Google Scholar
  20. Farah Z (1995) Personal Communication to the author (former Director of Syrian Ministry of Irrigation). Damascus, 20 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  21. Haas EB (1980) Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes. World Politics vol 32: pp 357 - 405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hokayem A, Bittar MC (1981) ’Empire Ottoman, les Arabes et les Grandes Puissances, 1914-1920. Editions Universitaires du Liban, Collection: l’Histoire par les Documents, Beyrouth International Friends of Kurdistan (2000) The Ilisu Dam and GAP, http://international-friends-of-kurdistan.s5.com/Ilisu%20Dam.htm/Ilisu%20Dam.htmGoogle Scholar
  23. International Rivers Network (2002) Swiss Bank UBS Quits Turkish Ilisu Dam ProjectGoogle Scholar
  24. International Rivers Network (2001) Balfour Beatty Withdraws from Ilisu Dam ProjectGoogle Scholar
  25. Kasm B (1996) The Syrian-Turkish Dispute over the Euphrates River in International Law: Recent Developments (in Arabic). Embassy of the Syrian Arab Republic, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  26. Kibaroglu A (1998) Management and Allocation of the Waters of the Euphrates-Tigris Basin: Lessons drawn from Global Experiences. Ph.D thesis, Bilkent UniversityGoogle Scholar
  27. Kienle E (1990) Ba’th v. Ba’th, the Conflict between Syria and Iraq, 1968-1989. I. B. Tauris & Co Ltd, London and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Kliot N (1994) Water Resources and Conflicts in the Middle East. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Kolars JF (2000) The Spatial Attributes of Water Negotiation, the Need for a River Ethic and River Advocacy in the Middle East. In: Amery H, Wolf AT (eds) Water in the Middle East, A Geography of Peace. The University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 245 - 261Google Scholar
  30. Kolars JF, Mitchell WA (1991) The Euphrates River and the Southeast Anatolia Development Project. Southern Illinois University Press, CarbondaleGoogle Scholar
  31. League of Nations (1940-1944) Great Britain and Northern Ireland, France and Turkey, Treaty of Mutual Assistance, Signed at Angora, October 19, 1939 and two Protocols annexed thereto of the same Date. Treaty Series no 4689 vol 200, pp 167 - 189Google Scholar
  32. League of Nations (1926-1927) Convention of Friendship and Good Neighborly Relations, with Procès-Verbal of Signature, Signed at Angora, May 30, 1926. Treaty Series no 1285 vol 54, pp 195 - 229Google Scholar
  33. League of Nations (1926-1927) France and Turkey, Agreement with a View to promoting Peace with Protocol relating thereto, Protocol concerning into coming into force, and Exchange of Notes, Signed at Angora, October 20, 1921. Treaty Series no 1284 vol 54, pp 177 - 193Google Scholar
  34. Mardam Bey S (1994) Syria’s Quest for Independence. Ithaca Press Reading, BeyrouthGoogle Scholar
  35. Morris M (1997) Water and Conflict in the Middle East: Threats and Opportunities. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism vol 20 no 1. pp 1 - 13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Picard E (1993) Eau et sécurité dans le bassin de l’Euphrate. In: Géopolitique vol 43. pp 75-79 Republic of Turkey (2003) The Turkish National Policy for Utilizing the Waters of the Euphrates-Google Scholar
  37. Tigris Basin (The Three-Staged Plan). Ministry of Foreign Affairs, http://www.mfa.gov.tr/grupa/ad/adg/adge/default.htmGoogle Scholar
  38. Republic of Turkey (2003) The Criteria Which Would Satisfy Each of the Countries in Allocating Transboundary Waters. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, http://www.mfa.gov.tr/grupa/ad/adg/adgd/Chap3.HTM Google Scholar
  39. Republic of Turkey (1996) Water Issues between Turkey, Syria and Iraq. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Department of Regional and Transboundary Waters, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  40. Republic of Turkey (1992) Turkey and the Question of Water in the Middle East. Turkish Embassy, Department of Information, FranceGoogle Scholar
  41. Republic of Turkey (1990) Press Statement on the Water Summit between Iraq, Syria and Turkey. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ankara, 26-27 JuneGoogle Scholar
  42. Rifai M (1998) A Regime for International Watercourses and its Application to the Tigris and Euphrates Basins (in Arabic). In: Water in the Arab World. Maalumat Editions, BeyrouthGoogle Scholar
  43. Syrian Arab Republic (2001) Al Atrash-Yilmaz Statements. Syrian Arab News Agency, Dam-ascus, 24 AugustGoogle Scholar
  44. Syrian Arab Republic (1999) Hydraulic Plans: 1995 - 1999. Ministry of Irrigation, DamascusGoogle Scholar
  45. Syrian Arab Republic (1995) Hydraulic Plans: 1990 - 1995. Ministry of Irrigation, DamascusGoogle Scholar
  46. Syrian Arab Republic (1993-1995) Exchange of Official Notes with Turkey.Google Scholar
  47. Syrian Arab Republic (1993) Common Statement Following the Visit of Turkish Prime Minister S. Demirel. Damascus, 19-20 JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  48. Syrian Arab Republic (1992) Common Statement Following the Visit of Turkish Minister of Foreign Affairs H. Cetin. Damascus, 2 AugustGoogle Scholar
  49. Syrian Arab Republic (1989) Common Minutes of Proceedings between Syria and Iraq. Baghdad, 17 April.Google Scholar
  50. Syrian Arab Republic (1987) Protocol of 1987 on Issues relating to Economic Cooperation between the Syrian Arab Republic and the Republic of Turkey. 17 JulyGoogle Scholar
  51. Syrian Arab Republic (1982-1992) Internal reports by the Syrian Delegation on the Two Techni-cal Committees between Iraq/Turkey and the Tripartite Syria/Iraq/Turkey Sessions. 10 Ses-sion of 17 to 27 May 1982; 2nd Session of 29 November to 2 January 1982; 3rd Tripartite Session of 26 to 28 September 1983; 4th Tripartite Session of 11 to 14 June 1984; 5th Tripartite Session of 5 to 8 November 1984; 6th Tripartite Session of 5 to 9 June 1985; 7th Tripartite Session of 25 to 30 January 1986; 8th Tripartite Session of 23 to 30 June 1986; 9th Tripartite Session of 10 to 16 January 1987; 10th Tripartite Session of 5 to 10 January 1988; 11th Tripartite Session of 1988; 12th Tripartite Session 13 to 20 March 1989; 13th Tripartite Session of 18 to 24 April 1989; 14th Tripartite Session of 29 November to 1 December 1989; 15th Tripartite Session of 7 to 12 March 1990; 16th Tripartite Session of 28 September to 2 October 1992Google Scholar
  52. Syrian Arab Republic (1972-1974) Internal reports by the Syrian Delegation on Tripartite Syria/Iraq/Turkey Sessions 1st Trilateral Session of 9 to 10 April 1972; 2nd Trilateral Session of 26 August to 7 September 1972; 3rd Trilateral Session of 1 to 27 November 1972; 4th Trilateral Session of 9 September to 6 October 1973; 5th Trilateral Session of 1 to 17 April 1974Google Scholar
  53. Syrian Arab Republic (1962-1974) Internal reports by the Syrian Delegation on Bilateral Syria/Iraq Sessions. 1St Bilateral Session of 24 September-9 October 1962; 2nd Bilateral Session of July 1963; 3rd Bilateral Session of 26 May to 2 June 1966; 4th Bilateral Session of 26 January to 9 February 1967; 5th Bilateral Session of 12 April to 7 May 1967; 6th Bilateral Session of 1-26 November 1967; 7th Bilateral Session of 6 to 22 April 1971; 8th Bilateral Session of 27 December 1971 to 3 January 1972; 9th Bilateral Session of March 1972; 10th Bilateral Session of 19 May to 5 June 1974; I lth Bilateral Session of 16 to 20 July 1974; 12th Bilateral session of 18 to 21 November 1974Google Scholar
  54. Syrian Arab Republic (1962-1971) Internal reports by the Syrian Delegation on Bilateral Syria/Turkey Sessions. 1st Bilateral Session of 16 to 22 January 1962; 2nd Bilateral Session of 3 to 16 September 1963; 3rd Bilateral Session of 19 to 29 January 1969; 4th Bilateral Session of 14 to 24 June 1971Google Scholar
  55. Tishrin (2001) Syria, Iraq Concerned at Turkish Use of Euphrates, Tigris. Damascus, 28 NovemberGoogle Scholar
  56. United Nations (1997) Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses. General Assembly, International Law Commission, Document 51/229, 21 May, http://www.un.org/law/ilc/texts/nnavfra.htm Google Scholar
  57. Unver 0 (1994) Innovations in Water Resources Development in Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) of Turkey. In: Bagis AI (ed) Water as an Element of Cooperation and Development in the Middle East. Hacettepe University of Ankara and Friedrich Naumann Foundation, Ankara, pp 27 - 37Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marwa Daoudy
    • 1
  1. 1.Development Studies DepartmentSchool of Oriental and African StudiesLondonUK

Personalised recommendations