Skip to main content

The A-optimal regularization parameter in uniform Tykhonov-Phillips regularization — α-weighted BLE-

  • Conference paper
V Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 127))

Abstract

Numerical tests have documented that the estimate \(\hat \xi \) of type BLUUE of the parameter vector ξ within a linear Gauss-Markov model {=E{y}, Σ y = D{y}} is not robust against outliers in the stochastic observation vector y. It is for this reason that we give up the postulate of unbiasedness, but keeping the set-up of a linear estimation \(\hat \xi = Ly\) of homogeneous type. Grafarend and Schaffrin (1993) as well as Schaffrin (2000) have systematically derived the best linear estimators of type homBLE (Best homogeneously Linear Estimation), S-homBLE and α-homBLE of the fixed effects ξ, which turn out to enhance the best linear uniformly unbiased estimator of type BLUUE, but suffer from the effect being biased. Here the regularization parameter in uniform Tykhonov-Phillips regularization (α-weighted BLE) is determined by minimizing the trace of the Mean Square Error matrix MSE α,s {\(\hat \xi \)} (A-optimal design) in the general case. In lieu of a case study, both model and estimators are tested and analyzed with numerical results computed from simulated direct observations of a random tensor of type strain rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, D.M. (1971): Mean square error of prediction as a criterion for selecting variables, Technometrics 13 (1971) 469–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D.M. (1974): The relationship between variable selection and data argumentation and a method for prediction, Technometrics 16 (1974) 125–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan, O. and Billor, B. (2000): Robust Liu estimator for regression based on an M-estimator, Journal of Applied Statistics 27 (2000) 39–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bapat, R.B. (1999): Linear Algebra and Linear Models, 2nd Edition, Springer, New York, Berlin, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouman, J. (1998): Quality of regularization methods,DEOS Report no. 98.2, Delft University Press 1998

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaturvedi, A. and Singh, S.P. (2000): Stein rule prediction of the composite target function in a general linear regression model, Statistical Papers 41 (2000) 359–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. R. Cox and N. Reid (2000): The Theory of the Design of Experiments, Chapman Hall/CRC, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • Donatos, GS. and Michailidis, GC.(1990)• Small sample properties of ridge estimators with normal and non-normal disturbances, Commun. Statist.-Simula. 19 (1990) 935–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, R.N. and Van Nostrand, C.R. (1979): Ridge regression and James- Stein estimation: Review and comments, Technometrics 21 (1979) 451–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droge, B. (1993): On finite-sample properties of adaptative least squares regression estimates, Statistics 24 (1993) 181–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engels, J., et al. (1993): The geoid as an inverse problem to be regularized, Proceedings of the international conference “Inverse Problems: Principles and Applications in Geophysics, Technology, and Medicine” Anger, G et al. (eds). Akademie Verlag, Berlin 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Engl, H. (1993): Regularization methods for the stable solution of inverse problems, Surveys on Math. for Industry 3 (1993) 371–143

    Google Scholar 

  • EL-Sayed, S.M. (1996): The sampling distribution of Ridge parameter estimator, The Egyptian Statistical Journal 40 (1996) 211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Farebrother, R.W. (1975): The minimum mean square error linear estimator and ridge regression, Technometrics 17 (1975) 127–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farebrother, R.W. (1976): Further results on the mean square error of ridge regression, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B.38 (1976) 248–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Farebrother, R.W. (1978): Partitioned ridge regression, Technometrics 20 (1978) 121–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Firinguetti, L. (1996): A simulation study of ridge regression in an incorrectly specified model, Estadistica 48 (1996) 115–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Firinguetti, L. and Rubio, H. (2000): A note on the moments of stochastic shrinkage parameters in ridge regression Commun. Statist.-Simula. 29 (3) (2000) 955–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, D.G(1981): A simulation study of some ridge estimators, Journal of the American Statistical Association 7 (1981) 131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golub, G, Heath, M. and Wahba, G (1979): Generalized cross-validation as a methods for choosing a good ridge parameter, Technometrics 21 (1979) 215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafarend, E. and Schaffrin B. (1993): Ausgleichungsrechnung in linearen Modellen, Bibliographisches Institut Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Gui, Q. and Zhang, J. (1998a): Robust biased estimation and its applications in geodetic adjustments, Journal of Geodesy 72 (1998) 430–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gui, Q., Huang, W., and Zhang, J. (1998b): Robust universal ridge estimation, Arta geodetica et cartographica sinica 3 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gui, Q. and Liu, J. (2000): Biased estimation in Gauss-Markov model, AVN 3 (2000) 104–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Gui, Q., Yang, Y. and Guo, J. (2001): Biased estimation in Gauss-Markov model with Constraints, AVN 1 (2001) 28–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunst, R.F. and Mason R.L. (1977): Biased Estimation in Regression: An Evaluation Using Mean Squared Error, Journal of the American Statistical Association 72 (1977) 616–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunst, R.F. and Mason, R.L. (1980): Regression Analysis and its Application, Marcel Dekker, New York 1980

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P. (1992): Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve, SIAM Review 34 561–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P. (1993): The use of the L-curve in the regularization of discrete ill-posed problems, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 14 (1993) 1487–1503

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanke, M. and Hansen, P. (1993): Regularization methods for large scale problems, Surveys on Math. for Industry 3 (1993) 253–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmerle, W.J. (1975): An explicit solution for generalized ridge regression, Technometrics 17 (1975) 309–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmerle, W.J. and Brantle, T.F. (1978): Explicit and constrained generalized ridge estimation, Technometrics 20 (1978) 109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, R.R. (1976): The analysis and selection of vari- ables in linear regression, Biometrics 32 (1976) 1–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, A. E. and Kennard, R.W. (1970a): Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems, Technometrics 12 (1970) 55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, A.E. and Kennard, R.W. (1970b): Ridge regression: Applications to nonorthogonal problems, Technometrics 12 (1970) 69–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, A.E., Kennard, R. W. and Baldwin, K.F. (1975): Ridge regression: Some simulations Analysis, Communications in Statistics 4 (1975) 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, R. W. (1985): Ridge Analysis 25 Years Later, The American Statistician 39 (1985) 186–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerl, R. W., Schuenemeyer, J. H. and Hoerl, A. E. (1985): A simulation of biased estimation and subset selection regression techniques, Technometrics 28 369–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilk, K. H. (1986): On the regularization of ill-posed problems, Proc. Int. symp. Figure and Dynamics of the Earth, Moon and Planets, Prague 1986, 365–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacirattin, S. Sakailoglu, S. and Akdeniz, F. (1998): Mean squared error comparisons of the modified ridge regression estimator and the restricted ridge regression 27 (1998) 131–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakkuri J. and Chen R. (1992): On Horizontal Crustal Strain in Finland. Bull. Géod. 66 (1992) 12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, J.F. and Wang, P. (1976): A simulation study of ridge and other regression estimations. Communications in Statistics AS (1976) 307–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Liski, E. P., et al. (2001) Topic in Optimal Design, Springer, New York and Berlin, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, K (1993): A new class of biased estimates in linear regression, Communications in Statistics A22 (1993) 393–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, A. K. and Maass, P. (1990): A mollifier method for linear operator equation of the first kind, Inverse Problems, 6 (1990) 427–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowerre, J. M. (1974): On the mean square error of parameter estimates for some biased estimators, Technometrics 16 (1974) 461–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallows, C.L. (1973): Some comments on Cp, Technometrics 15 (1973) 661–675

    Google Scholar 

  • Markiewicz, A. (1996): Characterization of general ridgeestimators, Statistics Probability Letters 27 145–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, W.D. (1970): Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation, and nonlinear estimation, Technometrics 12 (1970) 591–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, W.D. (1974): Discussion No.2, Technometrics 16 (1974) 189–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, W.D. and Snee, R.D. (1975): Ridge regression in practice, The American Statistician 29 (1975) 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, L.S. and Willke, T.A. (1973): On biased estimation in linear models, Technometrics 15 (1973) 497–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, GC. and Galameau, D.I. (1975): A Monte Carlo evaluation of some ridge-type estimators, Journal of the American Statistical Association 70 (1975) 407–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomura, M. (1988): On exact small sample properties of ordinary ridge estimators, Economics letters 27 (1988) 251–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomura, M. (1998): On exact small sample properties of the minimax generalized ridge regression estimators, Commun. Statist.-Simula. 17 (1988) 1213–1229

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohtani, K. (1986): On small’ sample properties of the almost unbiased generalized ridge estimator, Commun. Statist.-Simula. 15 (1986) 1571–1578

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohtani, K. (1998): An MSE comparison of the restricted Stein-rule and minimum mean squared error estimators in regression, Sociedad de Estadistica e Investigacion Operativa Test 7 (1998) 361–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D.L. (1962): A technique for the numerical solution of certain integral equations of the first kind, J. Ass. Comput. Mach. 9 (1962) 84–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pazman, A. (1986): Foundations of Optimum Experimental Design, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  • Pukelsheim, F. (1993): Optimal Design of Experiments, Wiley, New York 1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C.R. (1975): Simultaneous estimation of parameters in different linear models and applications to biometric problems, Biometrics 31 (1975) 545–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C.R. (1976): Estimation of parameters in a linear model (The 1975 Wald Memorial Lectures), The Annals of Statistics 4 (1976) 1023–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin, B., Heidenreich, E. and Grafarend, E. (1977): A representation of the standard gravity field, Manuscipta geodaetica 2 (1977) 135–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin, B. and Middel B.(1990): Robust predictors and an alternative iteration scheme for ill-posed problem, in Geophysical Data Inversion-Methods and Applications, A. Vogel, Ch. O. Ofoegbu, R. Gorenflo and Bj. Ursin (Eds.), Vieweg, Braunschweig (1990) 33–51

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin, B. (1995): A comparision of inverse techniques: regularization, weight estimation and homBLUP, IUGG General Association 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffrin, B (2000): Minimum mean square error adjustment, Part I: The empirical BLE and the repro-BLE for direct observations, Journal of the Geodetic Society of Japan 46 (2000) 21–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalabh (1998): Improved estimation in measurement error models through Stein rule procedure, Journal of Multivariate Analysis 67 (1998) 35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G and Campbell, F. (1980): A Critique of Some Ridge Regression Methods, Journal of the American Statistical Association 75 (1980) 74–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, V.K. et al. (1983): Some properties of the distribution of an operational ridge estimator, Metron 30 (1983) 227–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, C.M. (1974): Generalizations of mean square error applied to ridge regression, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B.36 (1974) 103–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Tykhonov, A.N. (1963): The regularization of incorrectly posed problem, Soviet Math. Doklady 4 (1963) 1624–1627

    Google Scholar 

  • Tykhonov, A.N. et al. (1977): A variational method of regularization in the adjustment of free geodetic nets, Geodesy, Mapping and Photogrammetry 19 (1977) 127–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Tykhonov, A.N. and Arsenin, V.Y. (1977): Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems, Wiley, New York 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinod, H.D. and Ullah, A. (1981): Recent advances in re- gression methods, Marcel Dekker, New York 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, P. (1992a): Determination of surface gravity anomalies using gradiometric observables, Geophys. J. Int. 110 (1992) 321–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, P. (1992b): The value of minimum norm estimation of geopotential fields, Geophys.J.Int. 111 (1992) 170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, P. (1998): Truncated SVD methods for discrete linear ill-posed problems, Geophys.J.Int. 135 (1998) 505–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, P. and Rummel, R(1994a): A simulation study of smoothness methods in recovery of regional gravity fields, Geophys.J.Int. 117 (1994) 472–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, P. and Rummel, R(1994b): Generalized ridge regression with applications in determination of potential fields, manuscripta geodaetica 20 (1994) 8–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. and Xiao, T. (2001): Fast realization algorithms for determining regularization parameters in linear inverse problems, Inverse Problems 17 (2001) 281–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenchenko, E. (2000): Estimation of the signal-to-noise in the linear regression model, Statistical Papers 41 327–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cai, J., Grafarend, E.W., Schaffrin, B. (2004). The A-optimal regularization parameter in uniform Tykhonov-Phillips regularization — α-weighted BLE-. In: Sansò, F. (eds) V Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 127. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10735-5_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10735-5_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-06028-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-10735-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics