Abstract
The development of space-borne measurement sensors and powerful computer hardware, in combination with improvements in mathematical and physical modelling, allow us to determine the Earth’s gravity field with increasing resolution and accuracy. The huge amount of data and unknowns and the stringent accuracy requirements pose the limits for simplifications of the functional and stochastic model and for the numerical and approximation errors introduced in the course of the least-squares data processing. This requires the design of sophisticated numerical algorithms despite of the increasing computer power. This paper addresses a number of computational problems that one frequently encounters in least-squares gravity field determination: i) how to set-up and solve the normal equations efficiently, ii) how to deal with instabilities, iii) how to model the observation noise correctly, iv) how to find optimal weights for different types or groups of observations? Possible solutions to these problems are presented and supported by simulations. The gravity field determination from satellite gravity gradients serves as an example, but the presented solutions may be used for other types of satellite data, as well. Moreover, some developments may also be relevant for other data acquisition techniques such as airborne gravimetry.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brockwell PJ, Davis RA (1991) Time series: theory and methods. Second Edition, Springer Series in Statistics, New York.
Cai J, Grafarend EW, Schaffrin B (2002) The A-optimal regularization parameter in uniform Tykhonov-Phillips regularization - a-weighted BLE. These proceedings.
Colombo O (1981) Numerical methods for harmonic analysis on the sphere. Reports of the Department of Geodetic Science, Report No. 310, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Colombo O (1986) Notes on the mapping of the gravity field using satellite data. In Sünkel H, editor, Mathematical and Numerical Techniques in Physical Geodesy, Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences, volume 7, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
P. Ditmar, E. Schrama, R. Klees (2001). Improved block diagonal approximation of the normal matrix in the inversion of satellite gravity gradiometry data. Proc. IAG 2001 Scientific Assembly, Budapest, Hungary, 2001, CD-ROM, 6 pages.
Ditmar P, Klees R (2002) A method to compute the earth’s gravity field from SGG/SST data to be acquired by the GOCE satellite. Delft University Press (DUP) Science, Delft, The Netherlands, 64 pages.
Ditmar P, Klees R, Kostenko F (2003) Fast and accurate computation of spherical harmonic coefficients from satellite gravity gradiometry data. Journal of Geodesy 76: 690–705.
ESA (1999) Gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation mission. Reports for Mission Selection - The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions, ESA SP-1233 ( 1 ), Noordwijk, The Netherlands.
Girard DA (1989) A fast `Monte-Carlo cross-validation’ procedure for large least squares problems with noisy data. Numer Math 56: 1–23.
Golub GH, Heath M, Wahba G (1979) Generalized cross-validation as a method for choosing a good ridge parameter. Technometrics 21: 215–223.
Hanke M, Hansen, PC (1993) Regularization methods for large-scale problems. Sury Math Ind 3: 253–315.
Hestenes MR, Stiefel E (1952) Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards 49: 409–436.
Klees R, Ditmar P, Broersen P (2003) How to handle colored noise in large least-squares problems. Journal of Geodesy 76: 629–640.
Klees R, Broersen P (2002) How to handle colored observation noise in large least-squares problems? - Building the optimal filter. Delft University Press, Science series, Delft, The Netherlands, 29 pages.
Koch R (1990) Bayesian inference with geodetic applications. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Kusche J, Klees R (2002) Regularization of gravity field estimation from satellite gravity gradients. Journal of Geodesy 76: 359–368.
Koch KR, Kusche J (2002) Regularization of geopotential determination from satellite data by variance components. Journal of Geodesy 76: 259–268.
Lerch FL (1991) Optimum data weighting and error calibration for estimation of gravitational parameters. Bull Géod 65: 44–52.
Levinson N (1946) The Wiener RMS (root mean square) error criterion in filter design and prediction. Journal on Mathematical Physics 25: 261278.
Schuh WD (1996) Tailored numerical solution strategies for the global determination of the earth’s gravity field. Mitteilungen der geodätischen Institute der Technischen Universität Graz, Folge 81, Graz, Austria.
Schwintzer P (1990) Sensitivity analysis in least squares gravity field modelling, redundancy decomposition of stochastic a priori information. Internal Report, Deutsches Geodätisches Forschungsinstitut, München, Germany, 14 pages.
Zhdanov MS (2002) Geophysical inverse theory and regularization problems. Methods in Geochemistry and Geophysics, volume 36, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Klees, R., Ditmar, P., Kusche, J. (2004). Numerical techniques for large least-squares problems with applications to GOCE. In: Sansò, F. (eds) V Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 127. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10735-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10735-5_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-06028-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-10735-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive