Advertisement

Multiscale Solution of Oblique Boundary-Value Problems by Layer Potentials

  • Willi Freeden
  • Carsten Mayer
Conference paper
Part of the International Association of Geodesy Symposia book series (IAG SYMPOSIA, volume 127)

Abstract

With the aid of classical results of potential theory, the limit- and jump-relations, a multiscale framework on geodetically relevant regular surfaces is established corresponding to oblique derivative data. By the oblique distance to the regular surface a scale factor in the kernel functions of the limit- and jump-operators is introduced, which connects these intergral kernels with the theory of scaling functions and wavelets.

As applications of the wavelet approach some numerical examples are presented on an ellipsoid of revolution. At the end we discuss a fast multiscale representation of the solution of the (exterior) oblique derivative (boundary—value) problem corresponding to geoscientifically relevant surfaces. A local as well as global reconstruction of the gravitational potential model EGM96 on the reference ellipsoid will illustrate the power of this appoach.

Keywords

Scaling functions and wavelets on regular surfaces potential operators jump relations multiscale analysis (exterior) oblique derivative problem of potential theory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Freeden W. (1980). On the Approximation of External Gravitational Potential With Closed Systems of (Trial) Functions, Bull. Géod., 54, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Freeden W., H. Kersten (1980). The Geodetic Boundary Value Problem Using the Known Surface of the Earth, Report No. 29, Geod. Inst. RWTH Aachen.Google Scholar
  3. W. Freeden, H. Kersten (1981). A Constructive Approximation Theorem for the Oblique Derivative Problem in Potential Theory, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 3, 104–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Freeden W., M. Schreiner, R. Franke (1996). A Survey on Spherical Spline Approximation, Surv. Math., 7, 29–85.Google Scholar
  5. Freeden W., U. Windheuser, Spherical Wavelet Transform and Its Discretization, Adv. Comput. Math., 5, 51–94.Google Scholar
  6. Freeden W., T. Gervens, M. Schreiner (1998). Constructive Approximation on the Sphere (With Applications to Geomathematics). Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon.Google Scholar
  7. Freeden W., C. Mayer (2001). Wavelets Generated by Layer Potentials, Apllied Computational Harmonic Analysis (accepted for publication).Google Scholar
  8. Glockner O. (2001). On Numerical Aspects of Gravitational Field Modeling from SST and SGG by Harmonic Splines and Wavelets (With Application to CHAMP Data). Doctoral Thesis, Geomathematics Group, Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. Kellogg O.D. (1929). Foundations of Potential Theory. Frederick Ungar Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  10. Kersten H. (1980). Grenz-und Sprungrelationen für Potentiale mit quadratsummierbarer Flächenbelegung, Resultate der Mathematik, 3, 17–24.Google Scholar
  11. Mayer C. (2001). Potential Operators, Jump Relations and Wavelets. Diploma Thesis, Department of Mathematics, Geomathematics Group, University of Kaiserslautern.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Willi Freeden
    • 1
  • Carsten Mayer
    • 1
  1. 1.Geomathematics Group, Department of MathematicsUniversity of KaiserslauternKaiserslauternGermany

Personalised recommendations