Advertisement

Trees IV pp 3-17 | Cite as

Acrocomia Species (Macauba Palm)

  • O. J. Crocomo
  • M. Melo
Part of the Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry book series (AGRICULTURE, volume 35)

Abstract

The tropical oil palms of the genus Acrocomia, spread all over the South and Central American continents, are very important since they produce oils that may be used for human consumption, the cosmetic industry, and also as a source of alternative fuel (Lleras 1985). Growing under natural conditions, Acrocomia palms’ oil yield is one third higher than that of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) and twice that of coconut (Cocos nucifera; Markley 1956; Wandeck and Justo 1983).

Keywords

Cocoa Butter Lauric Acid Date Palm Mature Embryo Coconut Palm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arkcoll D (1988) Lauric oil resources. Econ Bot 42(2): 195–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey LH (1949) Palmae incertae et novae. Gentes Herb 8: 93–205Google Scholar
  3. Bailey LH (1906) Cyclopedia of American Horticulture. vol. 1, 5A. MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Baillon MH (1876) Dictionaire de botaniquev. Tome 1°. Librairie Hochette et Cia, ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Balick MJ (1979) Amazonian oil palms of promise: a survey. Econ Bot 33(1): 11–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blake J, Eeuwens CJ (1981) Culture of coconut palm tissue with a view to vegetative propagation. In: Rao AN (ed) Tissue culture of economically important plants Costed, Singapore, pp 145–148Google Scholar
  7. Bolton ER, Hewer DG (1917) Brazilian oilseed. Analyst 42: 35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bondar G (1964) Palmeiras do Brasil. Inst Bot Secretaria da Agricultura do Estado de São Paulo, 159 ppGoogle Scholar
  9. Brazil (1985) Produção de combustíveis liquidos a partir de óleos vegetais. Ministério da Indústria e Comércio (Secretaria de Tecnologia Industrial). Brasilia, DF (Brazil), 364 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpenter JB, Ream CL (1976) Date palm breeding: a review. Date Grow Inst Rep 53: 25–33Google Scholar
  11. Collins GB, Vian WE, Phillips GC (1978) Use of 4-amino-3, 5, 6-trichloro-picolinic acid as an auxin source in plant tissue cultures. Crop Sci 18: 286–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coradin L, Lleras E (1986) Coleta de germoplasma de macaúba: situação atual. Embrapa/Cenargen Brasilia (DF) Newsl 2: 5–6Google Scholar
  13. Davis TA (1969) Clonal propagation of the coconut. World Crops 21: 253–255Google Scholar
  14. Ebert A, Taylor HF (1990) Assessment of the changes of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid concentrations in plant tissue culture media in the presence of activated charcoal. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 20: 165–172Google Scholar
  15. Hodell D (1977) Notes on embryo culture of palms. Principles 21: 103–108Google Scholar
  16. Hussey G (1958) An analysis of the factors controlling the germination of the seeds of the oil palm Elaeis guineensis Jack. Ann Bot 22: 259–284Google Scholar
  17. Ignacio LF Jr (1985) Present and future position of coconut oil in world supply and trade. J Am Oil Chem Soc 62: 197–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones LH (1974) Propagation of clonal oil palms by tissue culture. Oil Palm News 17: 1–8Google Scholar
  19. Kalustian P (1985) Pharmaceutical and cosmetic uses of palm and lauric products. J Am Oil Chem Soc 62: 431–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knapp AW (1914) Gru-gru oil. J Soc Chem Indust 33: 9–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Knaut J, Richtler HJ (1985) Trends in industrial uses of palm and lauric oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc 62: 317–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lleras E (1985) Acrocomia, a genus with great potential. Embrapa/Cenargen Brazil Newsl 1: 3–5Google Scholar
  23. Lieras E, Coradin A (1990) A systematic treatment of the genus Acrocomia Martius. Relatório Técnico. Coleta, caracterização consenvação de germoplasma de macaúba (Acrocomia sp.). Convênio Finep-Embrapa. Programa culturas pioneiras, Brasília, DF, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  24. Lopes CR, Reis SF, Ferreira MA, Moretzsohm MA (1991) Genetics of the genus Acrocomia (Palmae). II. Biochemical systematics. J Genet Breed 45: 223–226Google Scholar
  25. Lopes CR, Reis SF, Ferreira MA, Moretzsohm MA (1992) Genetics of the genus Acrocomia (Palmae). III Microgeographical genetic variability in isozyme frequencies. J Genet Breed 46: 9–14Google Scholar
  26. Markley KS (1956) Mbocaya or Paraguay cocopaim: an important source of oil. Econ Bot 10: 3–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Markley KS (1957) Fat and oil resources and industry of Brazil. Econ Bot 11: 91–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCoy RE (1983) Lethal yellowing of palms. Univ Florida, Inst Food Agric Sci, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  29. Moore HE Jr (1973) The major groups of palms and their distribution. Gentes Herb 11: 27–141Google Scholar
  30. Novaes RF (1952) Contribuição para o estudo do côco “macaúba”. Tese de Doutoramento. ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP (Brazil), 86 ppGoogle Scholar
  31. Reynolds ID, Murashige T (1979) Asexual embryogenesis in callus cultures of palms. In Vitro 5: 383–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rocha O (1946) 0 côco macaúba. Rev Agric (Piracicaba, SP, Brazil) 21:(1,2): 344–358Google Scholar
  33. Silva M (1940) Macauba oil. Industria Quimica (Argentina) 3: 39–41Google Scholar
  34. Sittolin IM, Cunha LHS (1986) Culture de embriões de macaúba (Acrocomia sp.) in vitro visando a implantação de um banco ativo de germoplasma. In: Abstracts of Simpósio Brasileiro de Cultura de Tecidos Vègetais, Brasìlia, 1987, Brazilian Association for Plant Tissue Culture (ABCTP) p 13Google Scholar
  35. Smith JL, Pintauro ND (1980) New perspectives and future trends. In: Tilbuz RH (ed.) Developments in food preservation. Applied Science, London, pp 137–160Google Scholar
  36. Sondahl MR, Teixeira JB (1991) Tissue culture of palms. In: Crocomo OJ, Sharp WR, Melo M, (eds). Biotechnology for plant production. CEBTEC/FEALQ, Univ São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP (Brazil), pp 205–248Google Scholar
  37. Tabai SA (1992) Propagação da palmeira macauba Acrocomia aculeata (Jack) Loddiges, através de métodos in vitro. Dissertação de Mestrado, CEBTEC-ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP (Brazil) 121 ppGoogle Scholar
  38. Teixeira JB, Sondahl MR, Kirby EG (1986) Asexual embryogenesis in mature embryo callus of palms (Acrocomia aculeata and Elaeis oleifira) In: Somers DA, Gengenbach BG, Biesboer DD, Backett WP, Green CE (eds) Abstract of Int Congr of Plant Tissue Cult, Minneapolis Int Assoc Plant Tissue Cult (IAPTC) p 191Google Scholar
  39. Tisserat B (1979) Propagation of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.). J Exp Bot 30: 1275–1283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Von Martius CFP (1824) Historia naturalis palmarum. Leipzig. 2: 66, tome 100Google Scholar
  41. Wandeck FA, Justo PG (1983) A macaúba fonte energética e insumo industrial. Sua significação econõmica no Brasil. Typed manuscript (Belo Horizonte, MG-Brazil). 52 ppGoogle Scholar
  42. Young FVK (1983) Palm kernel and coconut oils: analytical characteristics process technology and uses. J Am Oil Chem Soc 62: 326–331Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. J. Crocomo
    • 1
  • M. Melo
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Agricultural Biotechnology, CEBTEC/Dept. of Chemistry, ESALQ/USPPiracicabaBrazil

Personalised recommendations