Advertisement

Downstream of the Organizer: The Xenopus Cement Gland as a Model for Organ Positioning and Differentiation

  • Fiona C. Wardle
  • Hazel L. Sive
Chapter

Abstract

The correct positioning of organs during embryonic development requires multiple cues. The Xenopus cement gland, which forms where embryonic ectoderm and endoderm directly touch at the anterior of the embryo, is a simple model for organogenesis, allowing detailed analysis of this complex process. One way of thinking about how the cement gland is positioned is to define tissues and corresponding factors that alter cement gland formation. Several tissues including dorsal mesendoderm (Organizer), head endoderm and anterior neural plate induce cement gland, while others, such as ventral mesendoderm and chordamesoderm, inhibit its formation. One factor implicated in cement gland induction is BMP4, and it has been suggested that the cement gland forms at an intermediate level in a BMP4 gradient. An alternative view, presented here, is that the cement gland forms where large positional domains overlap. We suggest that these domains correspond to anterodorsal identity (AD), ventrolateral identity (VL), and ectodermal outer layer identity (EO), such that AD+VL+EO=CG. This “Venn diagram model” suggests that positional cues are integrated over time and space to activate cement gland differentiation genes. Genes corresponding to these domains are discussed.

Keywords

Xenopus Laevis Xenopus Embryo Neural Induction Cement Gland Neural Fate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beck CW, Whitman M, Slack JM (2001) The role of BMP signaling in outgrowth and patterning of the Xenopus tail bud. Dev Biol 238: 303–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blitz IL, Cho KW (1995) Anterior neurectoderm is progressively induced during gastrulation: the role of the Xenopus homeobox gene orthodenticle. Development 121: 993–1004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouwmeester T, Kim S, Sasai Y, Lu B, de Robertis EM (1996) Cerberus is a head-inducing secreted factor expressed in the anterior endoderm of Spemann’s organizer. Nature 382: 595–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyl PP, Signore M, Annino A, Barbera JP, Acampora D, Simeone A (2001) Otx genes in the development and evolution of the vertebrate brain. Int J Dev Neurosci 19: 353–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley L, Wainstock D, Sive H (1996) Positive and negative signals modulate formation of the Xenopus cement gland. Development 122: 2739–2750PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chalmers AD, Welchman D, Papalopulu N (2002) Intrinsic differences between the superficial and deep layers of the Xenopus ectoderm control primary neuronal differentiation. Dev Cell 2: 171–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang W, KhosrowShahian F, Chang R, Crawford MJ (2001) xPitxl plays a role in specifying cement gland and head during early Xenopus development. Genesis 29: 78–90Google Scholar
  8. Christian JL, Moon RT (1993) Interactions between Xwnt-8 and Spemann organizer signaling pathways generate dorsoventral pattern in the embryonic mesoderm of Xenopus. Genes Dev 7: 13–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christian JL, McMahon JA, McMahon AP, Moon RT (1991) Xwnt-8, a Xenopus Wnt-1/int-1-related gene responsive to mesoderm-inducing growth factors, may play a role in ventral mesodermal patterning during embryogenesis. Development 111: 1045–1055PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cox WG, Hemmati-Brivanlou A (1995) Caudalization of neural fate by tissue recombination and bFGF. Development 121: 4349–4358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dale L, Wardle FC (1999) A gradient of BMP activity specifies dorsal-ventral fates in early Xenopus embryos. Semin Cell Dev Biol 10: 319–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deblandre GA, Wettstein DA, Koyano-Nakagawa N, Kintner C (1999) A two-step mechanism generates the spacing pattern of the ciliated cells in the skin of Xenopus embryos. Development 126: 4715–4728PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dirksen ML, Morasso MI, Sargent TD, Jamrich M (1994) Differential expression of a Distal-less homeobox gene Xdll-2 in ectodermal cell lineages. Mech Dev 46: 63–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drysdale TA, Elinson RP (1992) Cell migration and induction in the development of the surface ectodermal pattern of the Xenopus laevis tadpole. Dev Growth Differ 34: 51–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drysdale TA, Elinson RP (1993) Inductive events in the patterning of the Xenopus laevis hatching and cement glands, two cell types which delimit head boundaries. Dev Biol 158: 245–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Durston AJ, Timmermans JP, Hage WJ, Hendriks HF, de Vries NJ, Heideveld M, Nieuwkoop PD (1989) Retinoic acid causes an anteroposterior transformation in the developing central nervous system. Nature 340: 140–144PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ekker SC, McGrew LL, Lai CJ, Lee JJ, von Kessler DP, Moon RT, Beachy PA (1995) Distinct expression and shared activities of members of the hedgehog gene family of Xenopus laevis. Development 121: 2337–2347PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Eyal-Giladi H (1954) Dynamic aspects of neural induction in Amphibia. Arch Biol 65:49 Fainsod A, Steinbeisser H, de Robertis EM (1994) On the function of BMP-4 in patterning the marginal zone of the Xenopus embryo. EMBO J 13: 5015–5025Google Scholar
  19. Fainsod A, Deissler K, Yelin R, Marom K, Epstein M, Pillemer G, Steinbeisser H, Blum M (1997) The dorsalizing and neural inducing gene follistatin is an antagonist of BMP-4. Mech Dev 63: 39–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Faucourt M, Houliston E, Besnardeau L, Kimelman D, Lepage T (2001) The pitx2 homeobox protein is required early for endoderm formation and nodal signaling. Dev Biol 229: 287–306PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Feledy JA, Beanan MJ, Sandoval JJ, Goodrich JS, Lim JH, Matsuo-Takasaki M, Sato SM, Sargent TD (1999) Inhibitory patterning of the anterior neural plate in Xenopus by homeodomain factors Dlx3 and Msxl. Dev Biol 212: 455–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gammill LS, Sive H (2000) Coincidence of otx2 and BMP4 signaling correlates with Xenopus cement gland formation. Mech Dev 92: 217–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gammill LS, Sive H (1997) Identification of otx2 target genes and restrictions in ectodermal competence during Xenopus cement gland formation. Development 124: 471–481PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gammill LS, Sive H (2001) otx2 expression in the ectoderm activates anterior neural determination and is required for Xenopus cement gland formation. Dev Biol 240: 223–236Google Scholar
  25. Gamse J, Sive H (2000) Vertebrate anteroposterior patterning: the Xenopus neurectoderm as a paradigm. Bioessays 22: 976–986PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gawantka V, Pollet N, Delius H, Vingron M, Pfister R, Nitsch R, Blumenstock C, Niehrs C (1998) Gene expression screening in Xenopus identifies molecular pathways, predicts gene function and provides a global view of embryonic patterning. Mech Dev 77: 95–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Glinka A, Wu W, Delius H, Monaghan AP, Blumenstock C, Niehrs C (1998) Dickkopf-1 is a member of a new family of secreted proteins and functions in head induction. Nature 391: 357–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harland R (2000) Neural induction. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10: 357–362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hausen P, Riebesell M (1991) The early development of Xenopus laevis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Hemmati-Brivanlou A, Kelly OG, Melton DA (1994) Follistatin, an antagonist of activin, is expressed in the Spemann organizer and displays direct neuralizing activity. Cell 77: 283–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hinkley CS, Martin JF, Leibham D, Perry M (1992) Sequential expression of multiple POU proteins during amphibian early development. Mol Cell Biol 12: 638–649PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hollemann T, Pieter T (1999) Xpitx-1: a homeobox gene expressed during pituitary and cement gland formation of Xenopus embryos. Mech Dev 88: 249–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huber TL, Perkins AC, Deconinck AE, Chan FY, Mead PE, Zon LI (2001) Neptune, a Kruppel-like transcription factor that participates in primitive erythropoiesis in Xenopus. Curr Biol 11: 1456–1461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hudson JW, Alarcon VB, Elinson RP (1996) Identification of new localized RNAs in the Xenopus oocyte by differential display PCR. Dev Genet 19: 190–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Isaacs HV, Andreazzoli M, Slack JM (1999) Anteroposterior patterning by mutual repression of orthodenticle and caudal-type transcription factors. Evol Dev 1: 143–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Isaacs HV, Tannahill D, Slack JM (1992) Expression of a novel FGF in the Xenopus embryo. A new candidate inducing factor for mesoderm formation and anteroposterior specification. Development 114: 711–720Google Scholar
  37. Itoh K, Kubota HY (1991) Homoiogenetic neural induction in Xenopus chimeric explants. Dev Growth Differ 33: 209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Itoh S, Itoh F, Goumans MJ, Ten Dijke P (2000) Signaling of transforming growth factor-beta family members through Smad proteins. Eur J Biochem 267: 6954–6967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jamrich M, Sato S (1989) Differential gene expression in the anterior neural plate during gastrulation of Xenopus laevis. Development 105: 779–786PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Jones CM, Broadbent J, Thomas PQ, Smith JC, Beddington RS (1999) An anterior signalling centre in Xenopus revealed by the homeobox gene XHex. Curr Biol 9: 946–954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Klein WH, Li X (1999) Function and evolution of Otx proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 258: 229–233PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kloc M, Reddy BA, Miller M, Eastman E, Etkin LD (1991) x121: a localized maternal transcript in Xenopus laevis. Mol Reprod Dev 28: 341–345Google Scholar
  43. Kurata T, Nakabayashi J, Yamamoto TS, Mochii M, Ueno N (2000) Visualization of endogenous BMP signaling during Xenopus development. Differentiation 67: 33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lai CJ, Ekker SC, Beachy PA, Moon RT (1995) Patterning of the neural ectoderm of Xenopus laevis by the amino-terminal product of hedgehog autoproteolytic cleavage. Development 121: 2349–2360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lamb TM, Knecht AK, Smith WC, Stachel SE, Economides AN, Stahl N, Yancopolous GD, Harland RM (1993) Neural induction by the secreted polypeptide noggin. Science 262: 713–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Leyns L, Bouwmeester T, Kim SH, Piccolo S, de Robertis EM (1997) Frzb-1 is a secreted antagonist of Wnt signaling expressed in the Spemann organizer. Cell 88: 747–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Li H, Tierney C, Wen L, Wu JY, Rao Y (1997) A single morphogenetic field gives rise to two retina primordia under the influence of the prechordal plate. Development 124: 603–615PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Lombardo A, Isaacs HV, Slack JM (1998) Expression and functions of FGF-3 in Xenopus development. Int J Dev Biol 42: 1101–1107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Marchant L, Linker C, Ruiz P, Guerrero N, Mayor R (1998) The inductive properties of mesoderm suggest that the neural crest cells are specified by a BMP gradient. Dev Biol 198: 319–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Merzdorf CS, Chen YH, Goodenough DA (1998) Formation of functional tight junctions in Xenopus embryos. Dev Biol 195: 187–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nieuwkoop PD, Faber J (1967) Normal table of Xenopus laevis. North Holland, Daudin, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  52. Onichtchouk D, Gawantka V, Dosch R, Delius H, Hirschfeld K, Blumenstock C, Niehrs C (1996) The Xvent-2 homeobox gene is part of the BMP-4 signalling pathway controlling [correction of controlling] dorsoventral patterning of Xenopus mesoderm. Development 122: 3045–3053PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Pannese M, Polo C, Andreazzoli M, Vignali R, Kablar B, Barsacchi G, Boncinelli E (1995) The Xenopus homologue of Otx2 is a maternal homeobox gene that demarcates and specifies anterior body regions. Development 121: 707–720PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Papalopulu N, Kintner C (1993) Xenopus Distal-less related homeobox genes are expressed in the developing forebrain and are induced by planar signals. Development 117: 961–975Google Scholar
  55. Piccolo S, Agius E, Leyns L, Bhattacharyya S, Grunz H, Bouwmeester T, de Robertis EM (1999) The head inducer Cerberus is a multifunctional antagonist of Nodal, BMP and Wnt signals. Nature 397: 707–710Google Scholar
  56. Pownall ME, Tucker AS, Slack JM, Isaacs HV (1996) eFGF, Xcad3 and Hox genes form a molecular pathway that establishes the anteroposterior axis in Xenopus. Development 122: 3881–3892Google Scholar
  57. Rebagliati MR, Weeks DL, Harvey RP, Melton DA (1985) Identification and cloning of localized maternal RNAs from Xenopus eggs. Cell 42: 769–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Saka Y, Smith JC (2001) Spatial and temporal patterns of cell division during early Xenopus embryogenesis. Dev Biol 229: 307–318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sasai Y, de Robertis EM (1997) Ectodermal patterning in vertebrate embryos. Dev Biol 182: 5–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sasai Y, Lu B, Steinbeisser H, de Robertis EM (1995) Regulation of neural induction by the Chd and Bmp-4 antagonistic patterning signals in Xenopus. Nature 376: 333–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schmidt JE, von Dassow G, Kimelman D (1996) Regulation of dorsal-ventral patterning: the ventralizing effects of the novel Xenopus homeobox gene Vox. Development 122: 1711–1721PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Schweickert A, Deissler K, Blum M, Steinbeisser H (2001) Pitxl and Pitx2c are required for ectopic cement gland formation in Xenopus laevis. Genesis 30: 144–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schweickert A, Steinbeisser H, Blum M (2001) Differential gene expression of Xenopus Pitxl, Pitx2b and Pitx2c during cement gland, stomodeum and pituitary development. Mech Dev 107: 191–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sharpe CR (1991) Retinoic acid can mimic endogenous signals involved in transformation of the Xenopus nervous system. Neuron 7: 239–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sive H, Bradley L (1996) A sticky problem: the Xenopus cement gland as a paradigm for anteroposterior patterning. Dev Dyn 205: 265–280PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sive HL, Hattori K, Weintraub H (1989) Progressive determination during formation of the anteroposterior axis in Xenopus laevis. Cell 58: 171–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sive HL, Draper BW, Harland RM, Weintraub H (1990) Identification of a retinoic acid-sensitive period during primary axis formation in Xenopus laevis. Genes Dev 4: 932–942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Snape A, Wylie CC, Smith JC, Heasman J (1987) Changes in states of commitment of single ani mal pole blastomeres of Xenopus laevis. Dev Biol 119: 503–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Takabatake Y, Takabatake T, Takeshima K (2000) Conserved and divergent expression of T-box genes Tbx2-TbxS in Xenopus. Mech Dev 91: 433–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tannahill D, Isaacs HV, Close MJ, Peters G, Slack JM (1992) Developmental expression of the Xenopus int-2 (FGF-3) gene: activation by mesodermal and neural induction. Development 115: 695–702PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Turner A, Snape AM, Wylie CC, Heasman J (1989) Regional identity is established before gastrulation in the Xenopus embryo. J Exp Zool 251: 245–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wang S, Krinks M, Lin K, Luyten FP, Moos M Jr (1997) Frzb, a secreted protein expressed in the Spemann organizer, binds and inhibits Wnt-8. Cell 88: 757–766PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wardle FC, Wainstock DH, Sive HL (2002) Cement gland-specific activation of the Xagl promoter is regulated by co-operation of putative Ets and ATF/CREB transcription factors. Development 129: 4387–4397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Weinstein DC, Hemmati-Brivanlou A (1999) Neural induction. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 15: 411–433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wilson PA, Hemmati-Brivanlou A (1995) Induction of epidermis and inhibition of neural fate by Bmp-4. Nature 376: 331–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wilson PA, Lagna G, Suzuki A, Hemmati-Brivanlou A (1997) Concentration-dependent patterning of the Xenopus ectoderm by BMP4 and its signal transducer Smadl. Development 124: 3177–3184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Wilson SI, Edlund T (2001) Neural induction: toward a unifying mechanism. Nat Neurosci 4 [Suppl]: 1161–1168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wolda SL, Moody CJ, Moon RT (1993) Overlapping expression of Xwnt-3A and Xwnt-1 in neural tissue of Xenopus laevis embryos. Dev Biol 155: 46–57PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yamada T (1938) Further analysis of the determination of the cement gland in Rana nigromaculata. J Fac Sci Tokyo Imp Univ 5: 133–163Google Scholar
  80. Zimmerman LB, de Jesus-Escobar JM, Harland RM (1996) The Spemann organizer signal noggin binds and inactivates bone morphogenetic protein 4. Cell 86: 599–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fiona C. Wardle
    • 1
  • Hazel L. Sive
    • 2
  1. 1.Wellcome Trust / Cancer Research UK InstituteCambridgeUK
  2. 2.Nine Cambridge CenterWhitehead Institute for Biomedical Research and Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations