On the Variability of Human Activity Spaces

  • Stefan Schönfelder
  • Kay W. Axhausen


The day-to-day perspective of individual travel behavior (i.e., intra-personal variability) has been the focus of a range of transport research studies over the last 40 years. The subjects of numerous studies were, for example, stability and flexibility in personal travel (Herz 1983), variability (Hanson and Huff 1982, 1988a, 1988b; Pas 1986, 1987), rhythms (Huff and Hanson 1990), or the dynamic adjustment of behavior towards a changing travel environment (Mahmassani et al. 1997; Mannering and Hamed 1990).


Activity Space Kernel Density Minimum Span Tree Travel Demand Home Location 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Axhausen KW (2002) A Dynamic Understanding of Travel Demand — A Sketch. Arbeitsbericht Verkehrs-und Raumplanung 119, Institut für Verkehrsplanung, Transportsysteme, Strassen-und Eisenbahnbau, ETH ZürichGoogle Scholar
  2. Axhausen KW, Zimmermann A, Schönfelder S, Rindsfiiser G, Haupt T (2002) Observing the Rhythms of Daily Life — A Six-week Travel Diary. Transportation 29 /2: 95–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachi R (1981) Mapping the Main Characteristics of Distributions of Populations over Territories. Technical Paper 43:23–67, US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Banister D (2000) Sustainable Urban Development and Transport — a Eurovision for 2020. Transport Review 20 /1: 113–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckmann MJ, Golob TF, Zahavi Y (1983a) Travel probability fields and urban spatial structure 1, Theory. Environment and Planning A, 15 /5: 593–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beckmann MJ, Golob TF, Zahavi Y (1983b) Travel Probability Fields and Urban Spatial Structure 2, Empirical Tests. Environment and Planning A, 15 /6: 727–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boulahbal M (1997) Les territoires individuels de la mobilité — Proposition d’une méthode de répresentation et premiers résultats. RTS 57: 36–51Google Scholar
  8. Bovy PHL (1996) Stochastic Traffic Assignment Technique Enhancements for Congested Networks. In: Bovy PHL (ed) Models for Tomorrow: Fundamental Contributions. Delft University Press, Delft, pp 129–145Google Scholar
  9. Brown LA, Moore EG (1970) The Intra-urban Migration Process — A Perspective. Geografiska Annaler 52B /1: 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buliung RN (2001) Spatiotemporal Patterns of Employment and Non-work Activities in Portland, Oregon. ESRI International User Conference, San Diego, California, July, 2001Google Scholar
  11. Chapin FS (1974) Human Activity Patterns in the City. Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Cirillo C, Axhausen KW (2002) Mode Choice of Complex Tours. Paper presented at ETC 2002, European Transport Conference, Cambridge, September 2002Google Scholar
  13. Cullen I, Godson V (1975) Urban Networks — The Structure of Activity Patterns. Progress in Planning 4 /1: 1–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dangschat J, Droth W, Friedrichs J, Heuwinkel D, Kiehl K (1980) Aktionsräumliche Forschung — Ergebnisse und Planungsrelevanz. ARL-Arbeitsmaterial 45, Akademie fir Raumforschung und Landesplanung, Hannover, pp 3–14Google Scholar
  15. Dijst, M (1999) Two-earner Families and their Action Spaces — A Case Study of two Dutch Communities. GeoJournal 4 /3: 195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dijst M, Vidakovi V (1997) Individual Action Space in the City. In: Ettema D, Timmermans HJP (eds) Activity Analyses. Pergamon, London, pp 117–134Google Scholar
  17. Downs R, Stea D (1977) Maps in Mind — Reflections on Cognitive Mapping. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Dürr H (1979) Planungsbezogene Aktionsraumforschung — Theoretische Aspekte und eine Pilotstudie. Beiträge der Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung 34, HannoverGoogle Scholar
  19. Fotheringham AS, Brunsdon C, Charlton M (2000) Quantitative Geography. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Golledge RG (1999) Human Wayfinding and Cognitive Maps. In: Golledge RG (ed) Wayfinding Behavior. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 5–45Google Scholar
  21. Goldenberg J, Libai B, Muller E (2001) Talk of the Network — A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-mouth. Marketing Letters 12 /3: 209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Golledge RG, Stimson RJ (1997) Spatial Behavior. The Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Hägerstrand T (1974) What About People in Regional Science? Papers of the Regional Science Association, 24 /1: 7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanson S, Huff JO (1982) Assessing Day-to-day Variability in Complex Travel Patterns. Transportation Research Record 891: 18–24Google Scholar
  25. Hanson S, Huff JO (1988a) Repetition and Day-to-day Variability in Individual Travel Patterns — Implications for Classification. In: Golledge R, Timmermans H (eds) Behavorial Modelling in Geography and Planning. Croom Helm, New York, pp 368–399Google Scholar
  26. Hanson S, Huff JO (1988b) Systematic Variability in Repetitious Travel. Transportation 15/1–2: 111–135Google Scholar
  27. Herz R (1983) Stability, Variability and Flexibility in Everyday Behaviour. In: Carpenter S, Jones PM (eds) Recent Advances in Travel Demand Analysis. Gower, Aldershot, pp 385–400Google Scholar
  28. Holzapfel H (1980) Verkehrsbeziehungen in Städten, Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Verkehrsplanung und Verkehrswegebau 5. Technische Universität, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  29. Hooge PN (2000) Movement, Animal Movement Analysis Arcview Extension. Alasca Biological Science Center, Glacier Bay, see.Google Scholar
  30. Horton F, Reynolds DR (1971) Effects of Urban Spatial Structure on Individual Behaviour. Economic Geography 47 /1: 36–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Huff JO, Hanson S (1990) Measurement of habitual behavior: Examining systematic variability in repetitive travel. In: Jones P (ed) Developments in dynamic and activity-based approaches to travel analysis. Gower Publishing, Aldershot, pp 229–249Google Scholar
  32. Jennrich RI, Turner FB (1969) Measurement of Non-circular Home Range. Journal of Theoretical Biology 22 /2: 227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kachigan S (1991) Multivariate Statistical Analysis — A Conceptual Introduction. Radius Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Kenyon S, Lyons G, Rafferty J (2002) Transport and Social Exclusion Investigating the Possibility of Promoting Inclusion through Virtual Mobility. Journal of Transport Geography 10 /3: 207–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kirkby C (2001) Estimation of Home Range, Core Area and Habitat Utilisation of Urban Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) Using a Fixed Kernel Technique in a GIS Environment. See.Google Scholar
  36. König A, Axhausen KW (2001) Modelling Mode Choice in the Mobidrive Survey. Paper at First Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona, March 2001Google Scholar
  37. Kutter E (1973) Aktionsbereiche des Stadtbewohners. Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung der territorialen Komponente im Tagesablauf der städtischen Bevölkerung. Archiv für Kommunalwissenschaften 13: 69–85Google Scholar
  38. Kutter E (1980) Randbedingungen aktionsräumlicher Konzepte in der Verkehrsursachenforschung. ARL-Arbeitsmaterial 45, Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung, Hannover, pp 85–89Google Scholar
  39. Kwan MP (2000) Interactive Geovizualization of Activity-travel Patterns Using Three-dimensional Geographical Information Systems — A Methodological Exploration with a Large Data Set. Transportation Research C 8 /2: 185–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lenntorp B (1976) Paths in Space-time Environment — a Time Geographic Study of Possibilities of Individuals. Lund Studies in Geography, Series B Human Geography 44, Department of Geography, The Royal University, LundGoogle Scholar
  41. Long L (1997) Panels for Transportation Planning Theoretical Issues and Empirical Challenges. In: Golob T, Kitamura R, Long L (eds) Panels for Transportation Planning, Methods and Applications. Kluwer, Boston, pp xv—xxiiiGoogle Scholar
  42. Lynch D (1960) The Image of the City. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  43. Mahmassani HS, Hatcher SG, Caplice CG (1997) Daily Variation of Trip Chaining, Scheduling, and Path Selection Behaviour of Work Commuters. In: Stopher PR, LeeGosselin MEH (eds) Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change. Perga-mon, Oxford, pp 351–379Google Scholar
  44. Mannering F, Hamed H (1990) Occurrence, Frequency and Duration of Commuters’ Work-to-home Departure Delay. Transportation Research B 24 /2: 99–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marble DF, Hanson PO, Hanson S (1972) Field Operations and Questionnaires, Household Travel Behavior, Study 1. Department of Human Geography, State University of New York at Buffalo, BuffaloGoogle Scholar
  46. Mitchell A (1999) The ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis, Volume 1, Geographic Patterns and Relationships. ESRI Press, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  47. Moore EG (1970) Some Spatial Properties of Urban Contact Fields. Geographical Analysis 2: 376–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ned Levine and Associates (1999) CrimeStat (Version 1. 0 ), A Spatial Statistics Program for the Analysis of Crime Incidents Locations. The National Institute of Justice, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  49. Newsome TH, Walcott WA, Smith PD (1998) Urban Activity Spaces Illustrations and Application of a Conceptual Model for Integrating the Time and Space Dimensions. Transportation 25 /4: 357–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pas EI (1986) Multiday Samples, Parameter Estimation Precision, and Data Collection Costs for Least Squares Regression Trip-generation Models. Environment and Planning A 18 /1: 73–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pas EI (1987) Intrapersonal Variability and Model Goodness-of-fit. Transportation Research A 21 /6: 431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Saxena S, Mokhtarian PL (1997) The Impact of Telecommuting on the Activity Spaces of Participants and their Households. Geographical Analysis 29 /2: 124–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scheiner J (2001) Berlin — noch immer geteilt? Untersuchungen zur Mobilität zwischen dem West-und Ostteil der deutschen Hauptstadt. Geographische Rundschau 53 /3: 17–23Google Scholar
  54. Schönfelder S (2001) Some Notes on Space, Location and Travel Behaviour. Paper presented at the First Swiss Transport Reseach Conference, Ascona, March 2001Google Scholar
  55. Schönfelder S, Axhausen KW (2001) Mobidrive — Längsschnitterhebungen zum individuellen Verkehrsverhalten Perspektiven für raum-zeitliche Analysen. In: Schrenk M (ed) Tagungsband/Proceedings CORP 2001. Technische Universität Wien, Band 2, pp 315–321Google Scholar
  56. Schwarze B, Schönfelder S (2001) ArcView-Extension VISAR — Visualisierung von Aktionsräumen, Version 1.6. Arbeitsbericht Verkehrs-und Raumplanung 95, Institut für Verkehrsplanung, Transporttechnik, Strassen-und Eisenbahnbau, ETH Zürich, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  57. Sheffi J (1985) Urban Transportation Networks. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  58. Silverman BW (1986) Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Simma A (2000) Verkehrsverhalten als eine Funktion soziodemografischer und räumlicher Faktoren. Dissertation, Universität InnsbruckGoogle Scholar
  60. Southwood TRE, Henderson PA (2000) Ecological Methods. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  61. Zahavi Y (1979) The `UMOT’ Project, US Department of Transportation RSPA–DPB, 20–79–3, US Department of Transportation, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  62. Zimmermann A, Axhausen KW, Beckmann KJ, Düsterwald M, Fraschini E, Haupt T, König A, Kübel A, Rindsfiiser G, Schlich R, Schönfelder S, Simma A, Wehmeier T (2001) Mobidrive Dynamik und Routinen im Verkehrsverhalten, Pilotstudie Rhythmik. Report to Bundesministerium fir Forschung und Technologie, PTV AG, Institut fir Verkehrsplanung, Transporttechnik, Strassen-und Eisenbahnbau (ETH Zürich) and Institut fir Stadtbauwesen ( RWTH Aachen ), Karlsruhe Zürich AachenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Schönfelder
  • Kay W. Axhausen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations