Merkel Cells in Human Transplanted Flaps

  • M. Vesper
  • P. Houdek
  • I. Moll
Conference paper


New procedures in the field of reconstructive surgery place more emphasis on the reconstruction of form and function. An important aspect is the touch perception of the transplanted tissue surface. The results of this study, involving the free radial forearm flap and the latissimus dorsi flap, allow the assumption that a nerve reconstruction is not necessary, because good reinnervation in most parts of the flaps can be observed. Merkel cells can be found within the hairy skin of most body regions. For the detection of Merkel cells CK 20 antibodies were used. Seven days after operation as well as after 2 and 4 months postoperative, CK 20-positive cells were found in the transplant. These results correlated with good recovery of touch perception.


Musculus Latissimus Dorsi Latissimus Dorsi Flap Hairy Skin Free Radial Forearm Flap Nerve Reconstruction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baumann I, Greschnik A, Bootz F, Kaiserling E (1996) Freie transplantierte, mikrovaskulär reanastomosierte Unterarmlappen zur Rekonstruktion in Mundhöhle und Oropharynx. HNO 44: 616–623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyd B, Mulholland S, Gullane P, Rotstein L, Brown D (1994) Reinnervated lateral antebrachial neurosome flaps: are we making sense? Plast Reconst Surg 93: 1350–1359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Costas PD, Heatley G, Seckel BR (1994) Normal sensation of the human face and neck.Google Scholar
  4. Plast Reconst Surg 93:1141–1145Google Scholar
  5. English KB (1977) The ultrastructure of cutaneous type I mechanoreceptors (Haarscheiben) in cats following denervation. J Comp Neurol 172: 137–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. English KB, van Norman DK, Horch K (1983) Effects of chronic denervation in type I cutaneous mechanoreceptors ( Haarscheiben ). Anat Rec 207: 79–88Google Scholar
  7. English KB, Horch K, van Norman DK, Burgess PR (1984) Neurothropic influences on cutaneous type I mechanoreceptors. In: Hamann W, Iggo A (eds) Sensory receptor mechanisms. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 36–45Google Scholar
  8. English KB, Wang ZZ, Stayner N, Stensaas LJ, Martin H, Tuckett RP (1992) Serotoninlike immunoreactivity in Merkel cells and their afferent neurons in touch domes from the hairy skin of rats. Anat Rec 232: 112–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. He L, Tuckett RP, English KB (1999) Chemosensitivity of the rat type I slowly adapting mechanoreceptor. Biol Signals Receptors 8: 382–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Horch K (1984) Specificity in regenerating cutaneous nerves. In: Hamann W, Iggo A (eds) Sensory receptor mechanisms. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 47–55Google Scholar
  11. Katou F, Shirai N, Kamekura S, Ohki H, Motegi K, Andoh N, Date F, Nagura H (1995) Intraoral reconstruction with innervated forearm flap. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 80: 638–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Levin S, Pearsell G, Rudermann W (1978) Von Freys method of measuring pressure sensibility in the hand: an engineering analysis of the Weinstein-Semmes pressure aesthesiometer. J Hand Surg 3: 211–216Google Scholar
  13. Posnick JC, Grossmann JA (2000) Facial sensibility testing: a clinical update. Plast Reconst Surg 106: 892–894PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Vesper
    • 1
  • P. Houdek
    • 2
  • I. Moll
    • 2
  1. 1.Abteilung für Zahn-, Mund-, Kiefer- und GesichtschirurgieUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Klinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und VenerologieUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations