Abstract
This paper attempts to reconcile the current controversy between liberalism and communitarianism in moral and political philosophy, referring to the lessons of the Methodenstreit (controversy on method) between theoretical and historical economists at the end of the 19th century in Austria and Germany. The Methodenstreit was a confrontation between Carl Menger and Gustav von Schmoller, or between the Austrian School of Economics and the German Historical School of Economics; it was alleged as a controversy about the relative superiority of a theoretical-deductive individualistic approach versus an historical-inductive-holistic approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. A. Schumpeter: History of Economic Analysis,New York (Oxford University Press) 1954, p. 814.
T. W. Hutchison: The Politics and Philosophy of Economics: Marxians, Keynesians and Austrians, Oxford (Basil Blackwell) 1981, p. 196.
Yuichi Shionoya: Schumpeter and the Idea of Social Science: A Metatheoretical Study,Cambridge (Cambridge University Press) 1997, Chapter 8. RICHARD SWEDBERG: Max Weber and the Idea of Economic Sociology,Princeton (Princeton University Press) 1998.
John Rawls: A Theory of Justice,Cambridge, MA (Harvard University Press) 1971 (Revised edition 1999).
Robert Nozick: Anarchy, State, and Utopia,New York (Basic Books) 1974.
Alasdair Macintyre: After Virtue,Notre Dame, IN (University of Notre Dame Press) 1981. MICHAEL SANDEL: Liberalism and the Limits of Justice,Cambridge (Cambridge University Press) 1982. MICHAEL WALZER: Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality,Oxford (Basil Blackwell) 1983.
Yuichi Shionoya: “Instrumentalism in Schumpeter’s Economic Methodology”, History of Political Economy,(Summer 1990). See also Y. SHIONOYA: Schumpeter and the Idea of Social Science,Chapter 5.
Yuichi Shionoya: “A Methodological Appraisal of Schmoller’s Research Programme,” in: PETER KOSLOwsKI (Ed.): The Theory of Ethical Economy in the Historical SchoolBerlin (Springer) 1995, pp. 72–74.
Carl Mender: Untersuchungen über die Methode der Socialwissenschaften, und der Politischen Oekonomie insbesondereLeipzig (Dunker & Humblot) 1883 (Investigations into the Method of the Social Sciences with Special Reference to Economicstrans. by Francis J. Nock, New York (New York University Press) 1985, p. 133.)
Joseph Agassi: “Institutional Individualism,” British Journal of Sociology, (June 1975).
F. Tonnies: Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft, Leipzig, 1887. Community and Civil Society, trans. by J. Harris and M. Hollis, Cambridge (Cambridge University Press) 2001.
K.H. Coase: The Firm, the Market, and the Law, Chicago (University of Chicago Press) 1988, p. 14.
Niklas Luhmann: Vertrauen: Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komlexität,Stuttgart (Ferdinand Enke Verlag) 1973 (2“d edition).
Gustav von Schmoller: Grundriss der allgemeinen Volkswirtschaftslehre, Erster Teil,Leipzig (Duncker and Humblot) 1900, pp. 53–57.
Gustav von Schmoller: “Das Merkantilsystem in seiner historischen Bedeutung: städtische, territoriale und staatliche Wirtschaftpolitik”, Schmollers Jahrbuch, 1884.
Yuichi Shionoya: “Rational Reconstruction of the German Historical School: An Overview”, in: Y. SHIONOYA (Ed.), The German Historical School: The Historical and Ethical Approach to Economics, London (Routledge) 2001, pp. 14–16.
Gustav von Schmoller: “Die Gerechtigkeit in der Volkswirtschaft”, Schmollers Jahrbuch, 1881. See GUSTAV VON SCHMOLLER “The Idea of Justice in Political Economy”, trans. by Ernst L. von Halle and Carl L. Schutz, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, (March 1894) pp. 27–28.
Yuichi Shionoya: Schumpeter and the Idea of Social Science: A Metatheoretical Study,Cambridge (Cambridge University Press) 1997.
Joseph Schumpeter: Capitalism and Democracy,New York (Harper & Brothers) 1950 (3d edition).
Heath Pearson: “Was There Really a German Historical School of Economics?” History of Political Economy, (Fall 1999 ).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shionoya, Y. (2004). A Reconciliation of the Liberal and Communitarian Debate in the Light of the Methodenstreit. In: Hodgson, B. (eds) The Invisible Hand and the Common Good. Studies in Economic Ethics and Philosophy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10347-0_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10347-0_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-06109-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-10347-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive