Advertisement

The ECG pp 505-523 | Cite as

Pacemaker ECG

  • Marc Gertsch
Chapter

Abstract

The first implantable cardiac stimulator device was used in humans in 1958. Since its introduction, this ingenious method for treating bradycardic arrhythmias has spread throughout the world; in 1998,601 000 new pacemakers were implanted worldwide. The total number of people fitted with pacemakers is estimated at more than 4 million — and with a global population of some 8 billion this means approximately one person in every 2 million has a pacemaker. In some countries the ratio is about 1:600.

The first pacemaker (implanted by Senning in 1958) was a simple ventricular PM and had a fixed rate, with no sensing of spontaneous heart beats. The next stages in pacemaker evolution brought the ‘on-demand’ device that was able to sense spontaneous rhythm, the dual-chamber pacemaker that allowed atrioventricular sequential pacing, and the rate-responsive device that accelerated the pacing rate by analyzing body movement, respiration rate, and other parameters. In more recent years additional sophisticated functions have been integrated.These include mode switch (automatic change from two-chamber pacing to ventricular pacing after the onset of atrial fibrillation), sleep function, telemetry (including memory properties for counts of spontaneous and paced beats in detail), and programmed rapid atrial stimulation.

Keywords

Ventricular Pace Atrial Pace Sick Sinus Syndrome Sinus Node Dysfunction Battery Depletion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bernstein AD, Daubert JC, Fletcher RD, et al. The revised NASPE/BPEG generic code for antibradycardia, adaptive-rate, and multisite pacing. PACE 2002;25:260–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chatterjee K, Harris AM, Davies JG, Leatham A. T-wave changes after artificial pacing. Lancet 1969;1(7598):759–60 (preliminary communication)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chatterjee K, Harris A, Davies G, Leatham A. Electrocardiographic changes subsequent to artificial ventricular depolarization. Br Heart J 1969;31:770–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bohm A, Hajdu L, Pinter A, et al. Runaway pacemaker syndrome and intermittent nonoutput as manifestations of end of life of a VVI pacemaker. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23:2143–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Antonelli D, Freedberg NA, Rosenfeld T. Acute loss of capture due to flecainide acetate. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001;24:1170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ellenbogen KA, Stambler BS, Orav EJ, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients intolerant to VVI(R) pacing. Am J Cardiol 2000;86:59–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ellenbogen KA, Gilligan DM, Wood MA, et al. The pacemaker syndrome — A matter of definition. Am J Cardiol 1997;79:1226–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Torresani J, Ebagosti A, Allard-Latour G. Pacemaker syndrome with DDD pacing. PACE 1984;7:1148–51PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barold SS. Repetitive reentrant and non-reentrant ventriculoatrial synchrony in dual-chamber pacing. Clin Cardiol 1991;14:754–63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ausubel K, Furman S. The pacemaker syndrome. Ann Intern Med 1985;103:420–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lüderitz B. ‘Pacemaker syndrome’ 70 years before the first pacemaker was implanted. J Intervent Card Electrophysiol 2001;5:341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    McWilliam JA. Electrical Stimulation of the heart in man. Brit Med J 1889;1:348–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gregoratos G, Cheitlin MD, Epstein AE, et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:1175–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glikson M, Hayes DL, Nishimura RA. Newer clinical applications of pacing. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997;8:1190–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gottlieb DJ. Cardiac pacing — a novel therapy for sleep apnea? N Engl J Med 2002;346:444–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barold SS. Indications for permanent cardiac pacing in first-degree AV block: class I, II, or III? (Editorial). PACE 1996;29:747–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hassenstein P, Wolter HH. Therapeutische Beherrschung einer bedrohlichen Situation bei der idiopathischen hypertrophischen Subaortenstenose. Verh Dtsch Ges Kreisl 1967;33:342–6Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rothlin M, Moccetti T. Beeinflussung der muskulären Subaortenstenose durch intraventrikuläre Reizausbreitung. Verh Dtsch Ges Kreisl 1967;33:411–5Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jeanrenaud X, Goy JJ, Kappenberger L. Effects of dual-chamber pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Lancet 1992;339(8805):1318–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kappenberger L, Linde C, Daubert C, et al. Pacing in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. A randomized crossover study. PIC study group. Europ Heart J 1997;18:1249–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maron BJ, Nishimura RA, McKenna WJ, et al. Assessment of permanent dual-chamber pacing as a treatment for drug-refractory symptomatic patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. A randomized, double-blind, crossover study (M-PATHY). Circulation 1999;99:2927–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sigwart U. Non-surgical myocardial reduction for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Lancet 1995;346(8969):211–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mazur W, Nagueh SF, Lakkis NM, et al. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after nonsurgical septal reduction therapy for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2001;103:1492–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shamim W, Yousufuddin M, Wang D, et al. Nonsurgical reduction of the interventricular septum in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. New Engl J Med 2002;347:1326–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Firoozi S, Elliott pacemaker, Sharma S, et al. Septal myotomy-myectomy and transcoronary septal alcohol ablation in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. A comparison of clinical, hemodynamic and exercise outcomes. Europ Heart J 2002;23:1617–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, et al (for the MIRACLE study group). Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. New Engl J Med 2002;346:1845–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Barold SS. New indications for cardiac pacing. In: Saksena S, Lüderitz B, eds. Interventional Electrophysiology — A Textbook. Mt Kisco, NY: Futura, 1996, pp 145–64Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosenqvist M, Brandt J, Schüller H. Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Am Heart J 1988;116:16–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hesselson AB, Parsonnet V, Bernstein AD, Bonavita GJ. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:1542–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Andersen HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP, et al. Prospective randomized trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet 1994;344(8936):1523–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1385–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lamas GA, Orav EJ, Stambler BS, et al (for the Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators). Quality of life and clinical out-comes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1097–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, et al (for the Mode Selection Trial in Sinus-Node Dysfunction). Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1854–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Toff WD, Skehan JD, De Bono DP, Camm AJ. The United Kingdom pacing and cardiovascular events (UKPACE) trial. UK Pacing and Cardiovascular Events. Heart 1997;78:221–3PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kristensen L, Nielsen JC, Pedersen AK, et al. AV block and changes in pacing mode during long-term follow-up of 399 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome treated with an AAI/AAI(R) pacemaker. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001;24:358–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Barold SS. Permanent single-chamber atrial pacing is obsolete. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2001;24:271–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc Gertsch
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cardiology, Swiss Cardiovascular Center BernUniversity Clinic InselspitalBernSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations