Abstract
The sick sinus syndrome is a disease of the sinus node and occurs in middle-aged and older patients, with some exceptions. The most probable predominant etiology is a degenerative process of the sinus node with frequent involvement of the AV node. Other etiologies include coronary heart disease (CHD), infectious diseases, and other rare conditions. Clinically the etiology often remains unclear and is classified as ‘unknown’. In the section The Full Picture’ the carotid sinus syndrome, which is different from the sick sinus syndrome, is briefly discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ferrer MI. The sick sinus syndrome. Mt Kisco, NY: Futura Publishing 1974
Kaplan BM, Langendorf R, Lev M, Pick A. Tachycardia-brady-cardia syndrome (so-called “sick sinus syndrome”). Pathology mechanisms and treatment. Am J Cardiol 1973;31:497–508
Rodriguez RD, Schocken DD. Update on sick sinus syndrome, a cardiac disorder of aging. Geriatrics 1990;45:26–30,33–36
Kyriakidis MK, Kourouklis CB, Papaioannou JT, et al. Sinus node coronary arteries studied with angiography. Am J Cardiol 1983;51:749–50
Rubenstein JJ, Schulman CL, Yurchak PM, De Sanctis RW. Clinical spectrum of the sick sinus syndrome. Circulation 1972;46:5–13
Chou TC. Sinus Rhythm. In: Chou TC (ed). Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice, Adult and Pediatric, fourth edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1991, pp 336–7
Mehta AV, Chidambaram B, Garrett A. Familial symptomatic sinus bradycardia: autosomal dominant inheritance. Pediatr Cardiol 1995;16:231–4
Crossen KJ, Cain ME. Assessment and management of sinus node dysfunction. Mod Concept Cardiovasc Dis 1986;55:43
Hoffmann A, Kappenberger L, Jost M, Burckhardt D. Effect of amiodarone on sinus node function in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Clin Cardiol 1987;10:451–2
Bertrand E, Le Gallais D, N’Dori R. The Flack test: a test exploring the sinus function in athletes. Apropos of 351 tests. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 1987;80:1533–9
Gomes JA, Mehta D, Langan MN. Sinus node reentrant tachycardia. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1995;18:1045–57
Benditt DG. Neurally mediated syncopal syndromes: pathophysiological concepts and clinical evaluation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1997;20:572–84
Kenny RA, Richardson DA. Carotid sinus syndrome and falls in older adults. Am J Geriatr Cardiol 2001;10:97–9
Gurtner HP, Lenzinger HR, Dolder M. Clinical aspects of the sick sinus syndrome. In Luederitz B (ed). Cardiac pacing. Berlin: Springer 1976, pp 12–24
Mieszczanska H, Ibrahim B, Cohen TJ. Initial clinical experience with implantable loop recorders. J Invasive Cardiol 2001;13:802–4
Alt E, Lehmann G. Stroke and atrial fibrillation in sick sinus syndrome. Heart 1997;77:495–7
De Sisti A, Leclercq JF, Fiorello P, et al. Electrophysiologic characteristics of the atrium in sinus node dysfunction: atrial refractoriness and conduction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2000;11:30–3
Benditt DG, Gornick CC, Dunbar D, et al. Indications for electrophysiologic testing in the diagnosis and assessment of sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 1987;75:III93–102(review)
Andersen HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP, et al. Prospective randomized trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick sinus syndrome. Lancet 1994;344:1523–8
Hesselson AB, Parsonnet V, Bernstein AD, Bonavita GJ. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:1542–9
Connolly II, Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing (CTOPP) Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1385–91
Lamas GA, Orav EJ, Stambler BS, et al. Quality of life and clinical outcome in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. New Engl J Med 1998;338:1097–104
Lamas GA, Kerry L, Lee K, et al. The Mode Selection Trial in Sick-Sinus Dysfunction (MOST). New Engl J Med 2002346: 1854–62
Wong GC, Hadjis T. Single chamber ventricular compared with double chamber pacing: A review. Can J Cardiol 2002; 18:301–7
Sutton R, Kenny RA. The natural history of sick sinus syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1986;9:1110–4
Saito D, Matsubara K, Yamanari H, et al. Effects of oral theophylline on sick sinus syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;21: 1199–204
Strickberger SA, Fish RD, Lamas GA, et al. Comparison of effects of propanolol versus pindolol on sinus rate and pacing frequency in sick sinus syndrome. Am J Cardiol 1993;71:53–6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gertsch, M. (2004). Sick Sinus Syndrome (and Carotid Sinus Syndrome). In: The ECG. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10315-9_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10315-9_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05656-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-10315-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive