Computers in the Management of Contact Dermatitis

  • Wolfgang Uter
  • Daniel Perrenoud
  • Stephanie Shaw
  • John D. Wilkinson
  • Axel Schnuch

Abstract

Nowadays it seems quite unnecessary to give reference to the unique features and advantages of computers, so indispensable have they become in both everyday and professional life. Not only has their sheer number increased, but also their quality, the mode of interaction between user and computer becoming increasingly intuitive and flexible. The scope of computer applications has also become much broader — including worldwide connectivity via the Internet.

Keywords

Permeability Expense Dermatitis Acrylate Editing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    van Bemmel JH, McCray AT (eds) (1995) The computer-based patient record. Yearbook of medical informatics 95. Schattauer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McCray AT, Nelson SJ (1995) The representation of meaning in the UMLS. Meth Inform Med 34: 193–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lindberg DAB, Siegel ER, Rapp BA, Wallingford KT, Wilson SR (1993) Use of MEDLINE by physicians for clinical problem solving. DAMA 269: 3124–3129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jones RG (1993) Personal computer software for handling references from CD-ROM and mainframe sources for scientific and medical reports. Br J Med 307: 180–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dooms-Goossens A, Degreff H, Drieghe J, Dooms M (1980) Computer assisted monitoring of contact dermatitis patients. Contact Dermatitis 6: 123–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ippen H, Schnuch A (1993) Das Göttinger Dokumentations-System ( Allphar-Medium) - Struktur und Nutzung auf allergologischem Gebiet. Allergologie 16: 146–50Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goossens A, Drieghe J (1998) Computer applications in contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 38: 51–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andersen KE, Rastogi SC, Carlsen L (1996) The Allergen Bank: a source of extra contact allergens for the dermatologist in practice. Acta Derm Venereol 76: 136–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Uter W, Geier J, Lessmann H, Schnuch A (1999) Unverträglichkeiten gegen Körperpflege-und Waschmittel: Was ist zu tun? Die Informations-und Dokumentationsstelle für Kontaktallergien (IDOK) des Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken ( IVDK ). Dt Dermatol 47: 211–214Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ziegler V, Richter C, Ziegler B, Haustein U-F (1989) INPRET–database on predictive tests (allergy). Semin Dermatol 8: 80–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perrenoud D, Perroud JP, Grillet JP et al (1993) Data base of topical drugs for Swiss dermatologists. Dermatology 183: 229Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anonymus (1998) Rote Liste Win 1998. ECV, AulendorfGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scheuer B, von Bülow V (1998) Liste Inhaltsstoffe 1998/1. Bits at work, KielGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rantanen T (1989) INFODERM–a microcomputer database system with Finnish product files. Semin Dermatol 8: 94–95PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Edman B (1988) The usefulness of detailed information to patients with contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 19: 43–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    de Groot AC, Weijland JW (1997) Conversion of common names of cosmetic allergens to the INCI nomenclature. Contact Dermatitis 37: 145–150PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Flyvholm MA (1993) Contact allergens in registered cleaning agents for industrial and household use. Br J Ind Med 50: 1043–1050PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brandorff NP, Flyvholm M-A, Beck ID, Skov T, Bach E (1995) National survey on the use of chemicals in the working environment: estimated exposure events. Occup Environ Med 52: 454–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Meindardi M (1995) The “Fuchs-System” - an information source about cosmetic ingredients in the Netherlands. IVDK session, December 1–2, 1995, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vigan M (1997) Les nouveaux allergenes des cosmetiques. La cosmetovigilance. Ann Dermatol Venereol 124: 571–575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mellström GA, Lindahl G, Wahlberg JE (1989) DAISY: reference database on protective gloves. Semin Dermatol 8: 75–79PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Geerißen H (1998) Schutzhandschuhe per Datenbank sicher auswählen. Die BG 09 /98: 550–554Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kopf AW, Rigel DS, White R, Rosenthal L, Jordan WP, Carter DM, Everett MA, Moore J (1988) DERM/INFONET: a concept becomes a reality. J Am Acad Dermatol 18: 1150–1157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Anonymus (1998) Praxis-EDV in Zahlen. PraxisComputer 8 /98, p 16Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Molina CI (1996) Position paper–information technology and media in allergy. Allergy 51: 603–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Beck MH, Hiller V (1989) Computer analysis of patients undergoing contact dermatitis investigation. Semin Dermatol 8: 105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gailhofer G (1988) Computerunterstützte Erfassung und Bearbeitung von Epikutantestdaten. Ein Modell. Derm Beruf Umwelt 36: 10–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Diepgen TL, Stuben 0 (1989) ALLDAT: an allergy data system for storage and analysis of test data with regard to epidemiological and occupational dermatology. Semin Dermatol 8: 101–102Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bahmer FA (1989) The Homburg model for computer-based documentation in allergy. Semin Dermatol 8: 99–100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    MacFarlane HA, Ross JA (1986) Use of a computer program for contact clinic results. Contact Dermatitis 14: 162–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Perrenoud D (1995) Easy management of patch-test data with a new windows-based software. Dermatology 191: 180Google Scholar
  32. 33.
    Fabbri P, Sertoli A (1971) Premesse e programmazione preliminare per l’uso del computer nella diagnostica dermato-allergologica. Folia Allergol (Rome) 18: 138–144Google Scholar
  33. 34.
    Edman B (1989) DALUK: the Swedish computer system for contact dermatitis. Semin Dermatol 8: 97–98Google Scholar
  34. 35.
    Uter W, Diepgen TL, Arnold R, Hillebrand 0, Pietrzyk PM, Stäben O, Schnuch A (1992) The informational network of departments of dermatology in Germany - a multicenter project for computer-assisted monitoring of contact allergy - electronic data processing aspects. Derm Beruf Umwelt 40:142–149 (published erratum: p 197 )Google Scholar
  35. 36.
    Nethercott JR, Holness DL (1989) The compilation of patch test information by the use of computerized data bases. J Am Acad Dermatol 21: 877–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 37.
    Schnuch A (1997) The European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA)–a new working party of the ESCD. European Society of Contact Dermatitis Newslett 97: 2–3Google Scholar
  37. 38.
    Uter W (1999) Classification of occupations. In: Kanerva L, Elsner P, Wahlberg J, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of occupational dermatology. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 27–31Google Scholar
  38. 39.
    McDonald CJ, Overhage JM, Dexter PR, Blevins L, Meeks-Johnson J, Suico, JG, Tucker MC (1998) Canopy computing–using the web in clinical practice. JAMA 280: 1325–1329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 40.
    Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W, Frosch PJ, Lehmacher W, Aberer W, Agathos M, Arnold R, Fuchs Th, Laubstein B, Lischka G, Pietrzyk PM, Rakoski J, Richter G, Rueff F (1997) National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series. Population adjusted frequencies of sensitization (PAFS) in 40.000 patients from a multicenter study ( IVDK ). Contact Dermatitis 37: 200–209Google Scholar
  40. 41.
    Engels EA, Spitz MR (1997) PACE-setting research. Lancet 350: 677–678PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 42.
    Charlton BG, Taylor PRA, Proctor SJ (1997) The PACE (population-adjusted clinical epidemiology) strategy: a new approach to multi-centred clinical research. Quart J Med 90: 147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Uter W, Schuch A, Geier J, Frosch PJ (1998) Epidemiology of contact dermatitis. The information network of Departments of Dermatology ( IVDK) in Germany. Eur J Dermatol 8: 36–40Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schnuch A (2000) Proposal for evaluating surveillance systems in contact dermatitis. In: Maibach HI, Schwindt DA (eds) Cutaneous biometrics. Plenum, New York (in press)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Black N (1997) Developing high quality clinical databases. The key to a new research paradigm. Br Med J 315: 381–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Peters KP, Frosch PJ, Uter W, Schnuch A, Arnold R, Bahmer FA, Brasch J, Diepgen TL, Elsner F, Fuchs T, Henseler T, Müller S, Przybilla B, Schulze-Dirks A, Stary A, Zimmermann J (1994) Typ IV-Allergien auf Friseurberufsstoffe. Ergebnisse einer multizentrischen Studie in acht Kliniken der Deutschen Kontaktallergiegruppe und des “Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken” in Deutschland. Derm Beruf Umwelt 42: 50–57Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kränke B, Derhasching J, Komericki P, Aberer W (1996) Bufexamac is a frequent sensitiser. Contact Dermatitis 34: 63–64PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Edman B (1991) Computerized analysis of concomitant contact allergens. Contact Dermatitis 24: 110–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Brasch J, Geier J, Schnuch A (1998) Differenzierte Kontaktallergenlisten dienen der Qualitätsverbesserung. Hautarzt 49: 184–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Albert J, Geier J, Lehmann M, Schoof J (1997) Lernende Klassifizierungssysteme zur fallbasierten Auswertung von Allergietestdaten. Allergo J 6: 408Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dooms-Goossens A, Drieghe J, Degreff H, Dooms M (1990) The “Codex-E”: an expert system for contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 22: 180–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Basketter DA, Scholes EW, Chamberlain M, Barratt MD (1995) An alternative strategy to the use of guinea pigs for the identification of skin sensitization hazard. Food Chem Toxicol 33: 1051–1056PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfgang Uter
  • Daniel Perrenoud
  • Stephanie Shaw
  • John D. Wilkinson
  • Axel Schnuch

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations