Occupational Contact Dermatitis

  • Richard J. G. Rycroft


In different ways, occupational contact dermatitis impacts heavily on the working lives of dermatologists, as well as on those of their patients. The clinician should keep in mind the leading role that work plays in people’s lives. Patients with occupational contact dermatitis naturally want their dermatitis to be cleared, without their livelihood being lost at the same time [1].


Contact Dermatitis Allergic Contact Dermatitis Personal Protective Equipment Natural Rubber Latex Contact Allergy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Calnan CD, Rycroft RJG (1981) Rehabilitation in occupational skin disease. Trans Coll Med S Afr 25 [Suppl Rehabil]: 136–142Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mathias CGT (1988) Occupational dermatoses. J Am Acad Dermatol 19: 1107–1114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adams RM (1990) Occupational skin disease, 2nd edn. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brauel P, Brauel R, Stresemann E (1995) Aerogenes Kontaktekzem and Bronchialasthma durch Kolophonium-Sensibilisierung. Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed 30: 549–551Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calnan CD (1977) Dermatology and industry (Prosser White Oration). Clin Exp Dermatol 3: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fregert S (1975) Occupational dermatitis in a 10-year material. Contact Dermatitis 1: 97–107Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Obituary (1991) N. Hjorth, 1919–1990. Contact Dermatitis 24: 161–163Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Obituary (1998) H. Ippen, 1974–1993. Contact Dermatitis 39: 159–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Obituary(1999) V. Pirilä, 1915–1998. Contact Dermatitis 40: 231Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foussereau J (1991) Guide de dermato-allergologie professionelle. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zschunke E (1985) Grundriss der Arbeitsdermatologie. VEB Verlag Volk and Gesundheit, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    English JSC (1998) A colour handbook of occupational dermatology. Manson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robinson MK (1999) Population differences in skin structure and physiology and the susceptibility to irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: implications for skin safety testing and risk assessment. Contact Dermatitis 41: 65–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McFadden JP, Basketter DA (2000) Contact allergy, irritancy and `danger’. Contact Dermatitis 42: 123–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coenraads PJ, Diepgen TL (1998) Risk for hand eczema in employees with past or present atopic dermatitis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 71: 7–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Allen MH, Wakelin SH, Holloway D, Lisby S, Baadsgaard 0, Barker JNWN, McFadden JP (2000) Association of TNFA gene polymorphism at position -308 with susceptibility to irritant contact dermatitis. Immunogenetics 51: 201–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dooms-Goossens A, Deleu H (1991) Airborne contact dermatitis: an update. Contact Dermatitis 25: 211–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rycroft RIG, Baran R (1994) Occupational abnormalities and contact dermatitis. In: Baran R,Dawber RPR (eds) Diseases of the nails and their management, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 263–284Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wall LM, Gebauer KA (1991) A follow-up study of occupational skin disease in Western Australia. Contact Dermatitis 24: 241–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rosen RH, Freeman S (1993) Prognosis of occupational contact dermatitis in New South Wales, Australia. Contact Dermatitis 29: 88–93Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kalimo K, Kautiainen H, Niskanen T, Niemi L (1999) `Eczema school’ to improve compliance in an occupational dermatology clinic. Contact Dermatitis 41:315–319Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hogan DJ, Dannaker CJ, Maibach HI (1990) Contact dermatitis: prognosis, risk factors, and rehabilitation. Semin Dermatol 9: 233–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meneghini CL, Angelini G (1984) Primary and secondary sites of occupational contact dermatitis. Dermatosen 32: 205–207Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    De Groot AC (1994) Patch testing. Test concentrations and vehicles for 3700 chemicals, 2nd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bruze M, Zimerson E (1997) Cross-reaction patterns in patients with contact allergy to simple methylol phenols. Contact Dermatitis 37: 82–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karlberg A-T (1991) Air-oxidation increases the allergenic potential of tall-oil rosin. Colophony contact allergens also identified in tall-oil rosin. Am J Contact Dermatitis 2: 43–49Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Karlberg A-T, Magnusson K, Nilsson U (1992) Air oxidation of d-limonene (the citrus solvent) creates potent allergens. Contact Dermatitis 26: 332–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Christensen LP, Kristiansen K (1999) Isolation and quantification of tuliposides and tulipalins in tulips ( Tulipa) by high-performance liquid chromatography. Contact Dermatitis 40: 300–309Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fenske RA (1993) Dermal exposure assessment techniques. Ann Occup Hyg 37: 687–706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fenske RA, Birnbaum SG (1997) Second-generation video imaging technique for assessing dermal exposure ( VITAE system ). Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 58: 636–645Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fregert S (1963) The organization of occupational dermatology in Lund. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 43: 203–205Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rycroft RJG (1988) Looking at work dermatologically. Dermatol Clin 6: 1–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Veien N, Hattel T, Laurberg G (1997) Low-humidity dermatosis from car heaters. Contact Dermatitis 37: 138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lewis RD, Feir D, Roegner K, Nayan A, Vordtriede S (1999) Investigation of bites and itching in a word processing department. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 60: 310–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rycroft RIG (1980) Occupational dermatoses in perspective. Lancet 2: 24–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Maguire A (1978) Psychic possession among industrial workers. Lancet 1: 376–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lobel E (1995) Post-contact chronic eczema: pension or rehabilitation. Aust J Dermatol 36: 59–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Davies NF, Rycroft RJG (2000) Dermatology. In: Cox RAF, Edwards FC, Palmer K (eds) Fitness for work, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 453–462Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zschunke E (1978) Metal corrosion (rust) as a result of hyperhidrosis. Dermatol Monatsschr 164: 727–728PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Calnan CD (1970) Studies in contact dermatitis. XXIII. Allergen replacement. Trans St John’s Hosp Dermatol Soc 56: 131–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fregert S (1980) Possibilities of skin contact in automatic processes. Contact Dermatitis 6: 23Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Forsberg K, Keith LH (1999) Chemical protective clothing performance index, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zhai H, Maibach HI (1998) Moisturizers in preventing irritant contact dermatitis: an overview. Contact Dermatitis 38: 241–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Held E, Agner T (1999) Comparison between 2 test models in evaluating the effect of a moisturizer on irritated human skin. Contact Dermatitis 40: 261–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schlüter-Wigger W, Elsner P (1996) Efficacy of 4 commercially available protective creams in the repetitive irritation test. Contact Dermatitis 34: 278–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Healy J, Johnson S, Little MC, MacNeil S (1998) An in vitro study of the use of chelating agents in clearing nickel-contaminated human skin: an alternative approach to preventing nickel allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 39: 171–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gruvberger B, Bruze M (1998) Can glutathione-containing emollients inactivate methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone? Contact Dermatitis 38: 261–265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Henschel R, Agathos M, Breit R (1999) Acute irritant contact dermatitis from propionic acid used in animal feed preservation. Contact Dermatitis 40: 328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Bransbury A, Burge S (1998) Rubber allergy in a shepherdess. Contact Dermatitis 39: 45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gauchia R, Rodriguez-Serna M, Silvestre JF, Linana JJ, Aliaga A (1996) Allergic contact dermatitis from streptomycin in a cattle breeder. Contact Dermatitis 35: 374–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Schauder S, Schröder W, Geier J (1996) Olaquindox-induced airborne photoallergic contact dermatitis followed by transient or persistent light reactions in 15 pig breeders. Contact Dermatitis 35: 344–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kanerva L, Susitaival P (1996) Cow dander: the most common cause of occupational contact urticaria in Finland. Contact Dermatitis 35: 309–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Mahler V, Diepgen TL, Hesse A, Peters K-P (1998) Protein contact dermatitis due to cow dander. Contact Dermatitis 38: 47–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Vente C, Fuchs T (1997) Contact dermatitis due to oil of turpentine in a porcelain painter. Contact Dermatitis 37: 187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Raccagni AA, Baldari U, Righini MG (1996) Airborne dermatitis in a painter. Contact Dermatitis 35: 119–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Eedy D (1996) Carbon-fibre-induced airborne irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 35: 362–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hjerpe L (1986) Chromate dermatitis in an engine assembly department. Contact Dermatitis 14: 66–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kanerva L (1998) Occupational fingertip protein contact dermatitis from grain flours and natural rubber latex. Contact Dermatitis 38: 295–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kanerva L, Vanhanen M, Tupasela 0 (1997) Occupational allergic contact urticaria from fungal but not bacterial a-amylase. Contact Dermatitis 36: 306–307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Bauer A, Bartsch R, Stadeler M, Schneider W, Grieshaber R, Wollina U, Gebhardt M (1998) Development of occupational skin diseases during vocational training in baker and confectioner apprentices. Contact Dermatitis 39: 307–311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Nethercott JR, Holness DL (1989) Occupational dermatitis in food handlers and bakers. J Am Acad Dermatol 21: 485–490PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Cronin E (1989) Dermatitis in food handlers. Adv Dermatol 4: 113–124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Bruynzeel DP (1997) Bulb dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 37: 70–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Shum KW, English JSC (1998) Allergic contact dermatitis in food handers, with patch tests positive to Compositae mix but negative to sesquiterpene lactone mix. Contact Dermatitis 39: 207–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hjorth N, Roed-Petersen J (1976) Occupational protein contact dermatitis in food handlers. Contact Dermatitis 2: 28–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Nielsen J (1996) The occurrence and course of skin symptoms on the hands among female cleaners. Contact Dermatitis 34: 284–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Karlberg A-T, Dooms-Goossens A (1997) Contact allergy to oxidized d-limonene among dermatitis patients. Contact Dermatitis 36: 201–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Allenby CF, Basketter DA (1994) The effect of repeated open exposure to low levels of nickel on compromised hand skin of nickel-allergic subjects. Contact Dermatitis 30: 135–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Nilsson EJ, Knutsson A (1995) Atopic dermatitis, nickel sensitivity and xerosis as risk factors for hand eczema in women. Contact Dermatitis 31: 401–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Zachariae COC, Agner T, Menné T (1996) Chromium allergy in consecutive patients in a country where ferrous sulfate has been added to cement since 1981. Contact Dermatitis 35: 83–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Olsayszky R, Rycroft RJG, White IR, McFadden JP (1998) Contact sensitivity to chromate: comparison at a London contact dermatitis clinic over a 10-year period. Contact Dermatitis 38: 329–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Skogstad M, Levy F (1994) Occupational irritant contact dermatitis and fungal infection in construction workers. Contact Dermatitis 31: 28–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Condé-Salazar L, Guimaraens D, Villegas C, Romero A, Gonzalez MA (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis in construction workers. Contact Dermatitis 33: 226–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Koh D, Foulds IS, Aw TC (1990) Dermatological hazards in the electronics industry. Contact Dermatitis 22: 1–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Lovell CR (1993) Plants and the skin. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp 97–105Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Wilkinson SM, Pollock B (1999) Patch test sensitization after use of the Compositae mix. Contact Dermatitis 40: 277–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Scales JW, Sherertz EF (1997) Occupational dermatitis transferred with job duties. Am J Contact Dermatitis 8: 179–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Leino T, Estlander T, Kanerva L (1998) Occupational allergic dermatoses in hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis 38: 166–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Armstrong DKB, Jones AB, Smith HR, Ross JS, White IR, Rycroft RJG, McFadden JP (1999) Occupational sensitization to p-phenylenediamine: a 17-year review. Contact Dermatitis 41: 348–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Kanerva L, Leino T (1999) Prevalence of natural rubber latex allergy in hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis 41: 168–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Armstrong DKB, Smith HR, Ross JS, White IR (1999) Sensitization to cocamidopropylbetaine: an 8-year review. Contact Dermatitis 40: 335–336Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Armstrong DKB, Smith HR, Rycroft RIG (1999) Contact allergy to methyldibromo glutaronitrile presenting as severe scalp seborrhoeic eczema. Contact Dermatitis 40: 335Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Shah M, Lewis FM, Gawkrodger DJ (1996) Occupational dermatitis in hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis 35: 364–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Cockayne SE, Gawkrodger DJ (1997) Occupational contact dermatitis in an aromatherapist. Contact Dermatitis 37: 306–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    O’Reilly FM, Murphy GM (1996) Occupational contact dermatitis in a beautician. Contact Dermatitis 35: 47–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Wakelin SH, White IR (1999) Natural rubber latex allergy. Clin Exp Dermatol 24: 245–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Kanerva L, Mikola H, Henriks-Eckerman M-L, Jolanki R, Estlander T (1998) Fingertip paresthesia and occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylics in a dental nurse. Contact Dermatitis 38: 114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Stingeni L, Lapomarda V, Lisi P (1995) Occupational hand dermatitis in hospital environments. Contact Dermatitis 33: 172–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Berl V, Barbaud A, Lepoittevin J-P (1998) Mechanism of allergic contact dermatitis from propacetamol: sensitization to activated N,N-diethylglycine. Contact Dermatitis 38: 185–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    De Groot H, de Jong NW, Duijster E, van Wijk RG, Vermeulen A, van Toorenenbergen AW, Geursen L, van Joost T (1998) Prevalence of natural rubber latex allergy (type I and type IV) in laboratory workers in the Netherlands. Contact Dermatitis 38: 159–163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Le Coz C-J, Coninx D, Van Rengen A, El Aboubi S, Ducombs G, Benz M-H, Boursier S, AvenelAudran M, Verret J-L, Erikstam U, Bruze M, Goossens A (1999) An epidemic of occupational contact dermatitis from an immersion oil for microscopy in laboratory personnel. Contact Dermatitis 40: 77–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Jolanki R, Estlander T, Kanerva L (1999) Occupational dermatoses among laboratory assistants. Contact Dermatitis 40: 166–168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Pryce DW, White J, English JSC, Rycroft RJG (1989) Soluble oil dermatitis: a review. J Soc Oc-cup Med 39: 93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Bruze M, Hradil E, Eriksohn I-L, Gruvberger B, Widström L (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from alkanolamineborates in metalworking fluids. Contact Dermatitis 32: 24–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Sasseville D, Al-Khenaizan S (1997) Occupational contact dermatitis from ethylenediamine in a wire-drawing lubricant. Contact Dermatitis 36: 228–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Corazza M, Maranini C,Venturini D, Virgili A (1999) Contact allergy to mercaptobenzothiazole in a bank clerk from a wet sponge. Contact Dermatitis 41: 105–106Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Ormerod AD, Wakeel RA, Mann TAN, Main RA, Aldridge RD (1989) Polyamine sensitization in offshore workers handling drilling muds. Contact Dermatitis 21: 326–329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Rycroft RJG (1999) Petroleum and petroleum derivatives. In: Adams RM (ed) Occupational skin disease, 3rd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 553–566Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Marconi PMB, Campagna G, Fabri G, Schiavino D (1999) Allergic contact dermatitis from colour developers used in automated photographic processing. Contact Dermatitis 40: 109–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Scheman AJ, Katta R (1997) Photographic allergens: an update. Contact Dermatitis 37: 130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Kanerva L, Jolanki R, Estlander T (1996) Offset printer’s occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by cobalt-3-ethylhexoate. Contact Dermatitis 34: 67–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Goossens A, Coninx D, Rommens K,Verhamme B (1998) Occupational dermatitis in a silk-screen maker. Contact Dermatitis 39: 40–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Aalto-Korte K, Jolanki R, Estlander T, Alanko K, Kanerva L (1996) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by Euxyl K 400. Contact Dermatitis 35: 193–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Hjorth N (1978) Gut eczema in slaughterhouse workers. Contact Dermatitis 4: 49–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Hjorth N, Roed-Petersen J (1980) Allergic contact dermatitis in veterinary surgeons. Contact Dermatitis 6: 27–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Dwyer CM, Ormerod AD (1997) Allergic contact dermatitis from thiuram in a veterinary medication. Contact Dermatitis 37: 132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard J. G. Rycroft

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations