Skip to main content

Fairness as a Motivator

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Organization and Management Innovation ((ORGMANAG))

Abstract

In their jobs, people often attach less importance to the absolute amount of their income than to the observance of norms of justice and fairness. Both distributive fairness (in terms of results) and procedural fairness (how decisions are made and people are treated) play a role. These aspects are investigated in the research conducted into the concept of justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • Lind, E. A./Tyler, T. R. (1988): The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebig, S. (1997): Soziale Gerechtigkeitsforschung und Gerechtigkeit in Unternehmen, Munich/Mering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, J. N./Kreps, D. M. (1999): Strategic Human Resources. Framework for General Managers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R./Blader, S. L. (2000): Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement, Psychology Press, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. (1998): Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management, Thousand Oaks/London/New Dehli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1996): The Quest for Justice on the Job, Thousand Oaks/London/New Dehli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R./Greenberg, J. (1985): Procedural Justice: An Interpretive Analysis of Personnel Systems, in: Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, vol 3, pp 141–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • For a discussion of the importance of fairness in knowledge management, see:

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. C./Mauborgne, R. (1998): Procedural Justice, Strategic Decision Making, and the Knowledge Economy, in: Strategic Management Journal 19, pp 323–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, S./Ruderman, M. (1987): The Role of Procedural and Distributive

    Google Scholar 

  • Justice in Organizational Behavior, in: Social Justice Research 1, pp 177–198. Folger, R./Konovsky, M. A. (1989): Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions, in: Academy of Management Journal 32, pp 115–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1990): Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow, in: Journal of Management 16, pp 399–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A. M./Pfeffer, J. (1990): Do You Get What You Deserve? Factors Affecting the Relationship Between Productivity and Pay, in: Administrative Science Quarterly 35, pp 258–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlin, D. B./Sweeney, P. D. (1992): Distributive and Procedural Justice as Predictors of Satisfaction with Personal and Organizational Outcomes, in: Academy of Management Journal 35, pp 626–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T./Degoey, R (1995): Collective Restraint in Social Dilemmas: Procedural Justice and Social Identification Effects on Support forAuthorities, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol 69, pp 482–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretz, E./Hertel, G./Moser, K. (1998): Kooperation and Organizational Citizenship Behavior, in: Speiß, E./Nerdinger Friedemann, W. (eds): Kooperation in Unternehmen, Munich/ Mering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H. (1991): Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship?, in: Journal of Applied Psychology 76, pp 845–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, R. H./Blakely, G. L./Niehoff, B. P. (1998): Does Perceived Organizational Support Mediate the Relationship Between Procedural Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behavior’?, in: Academy of Management Journal 41, pp 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niehoff, B. P./Moorman, R. H. (1993): Justice as a Mediator of the Relationship Between Methods of Monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior, in: Academy of Management Journal 36, pp 527–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organ, D. W. (1990): The Motivational Basis of Organizational Citizenship Behavior, in: Research in Organizational Behavior 12, pp 43–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (1989): The Psychology of Procedural Justice: A Test of the Group-Value Model, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, pp 830–838.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weibel, A., Rota, S. (2002). Fairness as a Motivator. In: Frey, B.S., Osterloh, M. (eds) Successful Management by Motivation. Organization and Management Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10132-2_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10132-2_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07623-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-10132-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics