Skip to main content

Segmentation of the Left Ventricle

  • Chapter
Stress Echocardiography

Abstract

As with all methods of cardiac imaging, from ventriculography to scintigraphy, the left ventricle can be subdivided into a series of slices or segments for the purposes of echocardiographic examination as well. Since universally accepted standardization is lacking, the number of segments and the echocardiographic views employed for their identification vary markedly in the literature. Segmentation of the left ventricle into 5, 9,10,11,13,14,16, and 20 segments has been proposed[1]. The resolution of the segmental approach is a function of the number of segments; thus, it can range from 20% (in the 5-segment model) to 5% (in the 20-segment model). However, increasing the number of segments, and thus reducing their size, leads to unacceptable complication of the analysis with a greater need for approximation and interpolation. A reasonable trade-off between accuracy and feasibility is represented by the 16-segment model proposed by the American Society of Echocardiography [2]. The wall segments are identified according to internal anatomical landmarks of the left ventricle, in the standard parasternal (long axis and short axis at the mitral, papillary, apical levels), apical (5−, 4−, 3−, and 2−chamber) and subcostal (long axis and short axis) views (Fig. 1). Each segment can usually be visualized in more than one echo-cardiographic section and from different approaches, for a more reliable and complete evaluation of wall motion. As a rule, segmental wall motion can be safely assessed when the endocardial contour is clearly visualized for at least 50 % of its length. The 16-segment model meets the basic requirements of any reasonable segmentation: it is simple enough to be employed in practice; it has an anatomical basis; segments can be easily identified on the basis of obvious echocardiographic landmarks; there is good correspondence with the distribution of coronary arteries; and the model has stood the test of multicenter cooperative studies [3].

The heart of others is not similar to yours... (Il cuore degli altri non è simile al tuo...)

Eugenio Montale, Nobel Prize for Literature, 1967

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Visser CA, Kan G, Meltzer R (eds) (1988) Echocardiography in coronary artery disease. Martinus Nijhoff, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  2. Edwards WD, Tajik AJ, Seward JB (1981) Standardized nomenclature and anatomic basis for regional tomographic analysis of the heart. Mayo Clin Proc 56: 479–497

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Picano E, Landi P, Raciti M, Pingitore A, Sicari R, Vassalle C, Mathias W, Lowenstein J, Petix N, Gigli G, Bigi R, Salustri A, Heymann J, Mattioli R, Chiarandà G, Galati A, on behalf of the EPIC-EDIC study project (1995) The multicenter trial philosophy in stress echocardiography: lessons learned from the EPIC study. Eur Heart J 11 [Suppl]: 23–25

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Society of Echocardiography Committee on standards, subcommittee on quantitation of two-dimensional echocardiograms: Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, Gutgesell H, Reichek N, Sahn D, Schnittger I, Silverman AH, Tajik AJ (1989) Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricle by two-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echo 2: 358–367

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feigenbaum H (1986) Coronary artery disease. In: Feigenbaum H (ed) Echocardiography, 4th edn, Chap 6. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 462–513

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feigenbaum H (1988) Exercise echocardiography. J Am Soc Echo 1: 161–166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weyman AE (1982) Cross-sectional echocardiography. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  8. Vandenberg BF, Kerber RE (1988) Regional wall-motion abnormalities and coronary artery disease: prognostic implications. In: Kerber RE (ed) Echocardiography in coronary artery disease. Futura, Mount Kisco, NY, pp 67–80

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Picano, E. (1997). Segmentation of the Left Ventricle. In: Stress Echocardiography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10090-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-10090-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-10092-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-10090-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics