Properties of a Harmonic Crystal in a Stationary Nonequilibrium State

  • Z. Rieder
  • J. L. Lebowitz
  • E. Lieb


The stationary nonequilibrium Gibbsian ensemble representing a harmonic crystal in contact with several idealized heat reservoirs at different temperatures is shown to have a Gaussian r space distribution for the case where the stochastic interaction between the system and heat reservoirs may be represented by Fokker—Planck-type operators. The covariance matrix of this Gaussian is found explicitly for a linear chain with nearest-neighbor forces in contact at its ends with heat reservoirs at temperatures T 1 and T N , N being the number of oscillators. We also find explicitly the covariance matrix, but not the distribution, for the case where the interaction between the system and the reservoirs is represented by very “hard” collisions. This matrix differs from that for the previous case only by a trivial factor. The heat flux in the stationary state is found, as expected, to be proportional to the temperature difference (T 1T N ) rather than to the temperature gradient (T 1T N )/N. The kinetic temperature of the jth oscillator T(j) behaves, however, in an unexpected fashion. T(j) is essentially constant in the interior of the chain decreasing exponentially in the direction of the hotter reservoir rising only at the end oscillator in contact with that reservoir (with corresponding behavior at the other end of the chain). No explanation is offered for this paradoxical result.


Heat Flux Linear Chain Kinetic Temperature Heat Reservoir Gibbs Ensemble 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    P. G. Bergmann and J. L. Lebowitz, Phys. Rev. 99, 578 (1955)Google Scholar
  2. J. L. Lebowitz and P. G. Bergmann, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 1, 1 (1957).Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    J. L. Lebowitz, Phys. Rev. 114, 1192 (1959).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    J. L. Lebowitz, Rend. Sculola Intern. Fis. XIV Corso Bologna, Italy (1961). evolution of µ. K(x, x’) dx dt is the conditionalGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    J. L. Lebowitz and A. Shimony, Phys. Rev. 128, 1945 (1962)Google Scholar
  6. E. P. Gross and J. L. Lebowitz, ihid. 104, 1528 (1956).Google Scholar
  7. 5.
    J. L. Lebowitz and P. Resibois, Phys. Rev. 139, A1101 (1965).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 6.
    O. Bils, “On the Non-Stationary Equilibrium of a Finite Chain of Coupled Oscillators” (to be published).Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    T G. Klein and I. Prigogine, Physics 19, 1053 (1953);MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. P. C. Hemmer, Kgl. Norske Videnskab. Selskab Fork. 33, 101 (1960);Google Scholar
  11. E. I. Takizawa and K. Kobayasi, Chinese J. Phys. 1, 59 (1963);ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. E. Teramoto, Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto) 28, 1059 (1962);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. R. Rubin, Phys. Rev. 131, 964 (1963).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 8.
    M. C. Wang and G. E. Uhlenbeck, Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 323 (1945).MathSciNetADSMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1967

Authors and Affiliations

  • Z. Rieder
    • 1
  • J. L. Lebowitz
    • 1
  • E. Lieb
    • 1
  1. 1.Belfer Graduate School of ScienceYeshiva UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations