Abstract
To correct the disincentives of liquidity assistance during financial crises, the official sector recently announced attempts to involve the private sector in the resolution of debt crises. This paper empirically tests the reaction of investors to announcements of Private Sector Involvement (PSI). For this purpose we disentangle shifts in risk premia incorporated in excess returns on emerging market bonds into changes in risk and shifts in the price of risk. A regime-switching GARCH-M model is employed to separate two regimes with respect to the market price of risk. It is shown that the likelihood of switching to a state with a high price of risk rises in response to PSI announcements. Thus, the results indicate that burden sharing was credible and effective.
I am grateful to Volker Clausen for detailed comments and suggestions. All remaining errors are mine.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ang A, Bekaert G (2002) Regime Switches in Interest Rates. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 20: 163–182.
Bollerslev T (1995) Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity. In: Engle RF (ed.) ARCH - Selected Readings. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Chou R, Engle RF, Kane A (1992) Measuring risk aversion from excess returns on a stock index. Journal of Econometrics 52: 201–224.
Dell’Ariccia G, Schnabel I, Zettelmeyer J. (2000) Moral Hazard and International Crisis Lending: A Test. mimeo, International Monetary Fund.
Diebold FX, Lee JH, Weinbach GC (1994) Regime switching with time-varying transition probabilities. In: Hargreaves CP (ed.) Nonstationary Time Series Analysis and Cointegration. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Eichengreen B (2000) Can the moral hazard caused by IMF bailouts be reduced? Geneva Reports on the Global Economy, Special Report 1, September 2000.
Eichengreen B, Rühl C (2001) The Bail-In Problem: Systematic Goals, Ad Hoc Means. Economic Systems 25: 3–32.
Engle RF, Lilien DM, Robins PR (1987) Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in the Term Structure: The ARCH-M Model. Econometrica 55: 391–407.
Gai P, Vause N (2002) IMF Programme Design & Private Sector Involvement in Crisis Resolution. mimeo, Bank of England.
Gai P, Hayes S, Shin HS (2001) Crisis Costs and Debtor Discipline: The Efficacy of Public Policy in Sovereign Debt Crises. mimeo, Bank of England.
Girard E, Rahman H, Zaher T. (2001) Intertemporal risk-return relationship in the Asian markets around the Asian crisis. Financial Services Review 10: 249–272.
Haldane AG (1999) Private sector involvement in financial crisis: analytics and public policy approaches. Financial Stability Review, Bank of England, November 1999: 184–202.
Hamilton JD (1989) A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle. Econometrica 57: 357–384.
Hamilton JD (1990) Analysis of Time Series Subject to Changes in Regime. Journal of Econometrics 45: 39–70.
Hamilton JD, Susmel R (1994) Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity and changes in regime. Journal of Econometrics 64: 307–333.
Hansson BA, Hördahl P (1997) Changing Risk Premia: Evidence from a Small Open Economy. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 99: 335–350.
IMF (1999) Involving the Private Sector in Forestalling and Resolving Financial Crises. International Monetary Fund, April 1999.
Jochum C (1999) Volatility spillovers and the price of risk: Evidence from the Swiss stock market. Empirical Economics 24: 303–322.
Kamin SB (2002) Identifying the role of moral hazard in international financial markets. International Finance Discussion Papers, No. 736, Federal Reserve Board of Governors. Lane T, Phillips S (2000) Does IMF Financing Result in Moral Hazard? IMF Working Paper, No. 00/168, International Monetary Fund.
Lipworth G, Nystedt J (2001) Crisis Resolution and Private Sector Adaption. IMF Staff Papers 47, Special Issue: 188–214.
McBrady M, Seasholes MS (2000) Bailing In. mimeo, University of California, Berkeley. Miller M, Zhang L (2000) Sovereign Liquidity Crises: The Strategic Case for a Payments Standstill. The Economic Journal 110: 335–362.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tillmann, P. (2004). The Credibility of Private Sector Involvement in the Resolution of Financial Crises. In: Frenkel, M., Karmann, A., Scholtens, B. (eds) Sovereign Risk and Financial Crises. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09950-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09950-6_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-06080-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-09950-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive