Using New Media for Customer Interaction: A Challenge for Relationship Marketing

  • Bernd Stauss


Direct interaction processes, geared towards contact maintenance and repeated transactions, are an integral part of the relationship marketing concept. New types of communication now available through the internet offer a number of new and promising opportunities for the intended dialogue. This applies in particular to company-controlled communication. This gives companies the ability to customize information with regard to the individual needs of a particular customer and to optimize the customer’s feedback opportunities. To achieve this, however, companies must satisfy demanding preconditions related to technology, personnel, organization and co-ordination. Companies also face a completely different challenge arising from customer-controlled internet communication. When customers publish their criticism of products and companies online and make their individual criticism the subject of global word of mouth, customer-customer communication becomes a real threat. In order to prevent serious damage to customer relationships, managers must monitor these communications carefully, analyze them, and react appropriately.


Relationship Marketing Business Relationship Relationship Market Customer Interaction Gamble Product 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahlert, H. (2000): Enterprise Customer Management: Integrating Corporate and Customer Information, in this book.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous (1997): Lexus of Annapolis Sucks WWW Page,, April 16th.Google Scholar
  3. Berres, A. (1997): Das Internet als neuer Kommunikations- und Vertriebskanal [The Internet As a New Channel for Communication and Distribution], Marktforschung & Management, 41 (5), 203–207.Google Scholar
  4. Cooperstock, J. (1999): United Airlines poor customer service — Untied Airlines,, June 1st.Google Scholar
  5. Diller, H. (1995a): Beziehungsmanagement [Relationship Management], in: Handwörterbuch des Marketing [Encyclopedia ofMarketing], B. Tietz, R. Köhler, and J. Zentes, eds., 2nd ed., Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel, col. 285–300.Google Scholar
  6. Diller, H. (1995b): Beziehungs-Marketing [Relationship Marketing], Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 24 (9), 442–447.Google Scholar
  7. Diller, H. (2000): Customer Loyalty: Fata Morgana or Realistic Goal? Managing Relationships with Customers, in this book.Google Scholar
  8. Diller, H. & B. Negelmann (1998): Kundenchats als innovative Kommunikations -instrumente im Beziehungsmarketing [Customer Chatrooms as Innovative Communication Tools for Relationship Marketing], working paper No. 67, Department of Marketing, University of Nuremberg-Erlangen, Nuremberg, Germany.Google Scholar
  9. Hansen, U. & K. Jeschke (1995): Beschwerdemanagement für Dienstleistungsunternehmen — Beispiel des Kfz-Handels [Complaint Management for Service Companies — The Car Retail Example], in: Dienstleistungsqualität [Service Quality], M. Bruhn and B. Stauss, eds., 2nd ed., Wiesbaden: Gabler, 525–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayes, J. & F. Dredge (1998): Managing Customer Service, Aldershot Hampshire: Gwer.Google Scholar
  11. Hennig-Thurau, T., K.P. Gwinner & D.D. Gremier (2000): Why Customers Build Relationships with Companies — and Why not, in this book.Google Scholar
  12. Hiinerberg, R., G. Heise & A. Mann (1997): Was Online-Kommunikation für das Marketing bedeutet [What Online Communication Means for Marketing], Thexis, 14 (1), 16–21.Google Scholar
  13. Jaros-Sturhahn, A. & K. Schachtner (1998): Betriebswirtschaftliches Anwendungspotential des World Wide Web [The Practical Potential of the World Wide Web for Business], Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium, 27 (2), 85–90.Google Scholar
  14. Kroeber-Riel, W. & P. Weinberg (1996): Konsumentenverhalten [Consumer Behavior]‘, 6th ed., Munich: Vahlen.Google Scholar
  15. Mayer, R. (1996): Kundenbindung online — Kundenclubs im Internet [Customer Retention Online — Customer Clubs on the Internet], Direct Marketing, 32 (9), 32–34.Google Scholar
  16. McInformation Network (1999): McSpotlight,, June Ist.Google Scholar
  17. misc.consumers (1997a): Thread “Panasonic VCR problem — very long”, initiated on April 1st in the news group misc.consumers.Google Scholar
  18. misc.consumers (1997b): Thread “Directv sucks, They went too far this time!!!”, initiated on April 4th in the news group misc.consumers.Google Scholar
  19. misc.consumers (1997c): Thread “Boycott Best Western Motels”, initiated on April 4th in the news group misc.consumers.Google Scholar
  20. misc.consumers (1997d): Thread “I’m sick of AT&T telemarketing”, initiated on April 17th in the news group misc.consumers.Google Scholar
  21. Myers, S. (1999): The Official Internet Anti-Nike Site!, http://www,, June 1st.Google Scholar
  22. Oenicke, J. (1996): Online-Marketing: Kommerzielle Kommunikation im interaktiven Zeitalter [Online Marketing: Business Communication in the Interactive Age], Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar
  23. PGInfonet (1999): Procter & Gamble Poisons Animals,, June 1st.Google Scholar
  24. (1997): Thread “Query: Hotel Near DC Metro?”, initiated on April 20th in the news group Scholar
  25. Rosenberger, G. (2000): Relationship Marketing from a Consumer Policy Perspective, in this book.Google Scholar
  26. Stauss, B. (1997): Global Word of Mouth. Service Bashing on the Internet is a Thorny Issue, Marketing Management, 6 (3), 28–30.Google Scholar
  27. Sterne, J. (1996): Customer Service on the Internet, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. TUI (1999): TUI Agent,, June 1st.Google Scholar
  29. Zerfaß, A. (1998): öffentlichkeitsarbeit mit interaktiven Medien: Grundlagen und Anwendungen [Public Relations and Interactive Media: Basics and Applications], in: Interaktive Unternehmenskommunikation [Interactive Communication], M. Krzeminski and A. Zerfaß, eds., Frankfurt/Main: IMK, 29–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernd Stauss
    • 1
  1. 1.Catholic University of EichstaettIngolstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations