Advertisement

Regeneration of Plants from Protoplasts of Beta vulgaris (Sugar Beet)

  • R. D. Hall
  • C. Pedersen
  • F. A. Krens
Part of the Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry book series (AGRICULTURE, volume 29)

Abstract

The genus Beta (family Chenopodiaceae) consists of 13 species. All cultivated forms of beet belong to the species Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris in the section Beta. Early types of beet with a swollen root were probably domesticated from ancestral maritime (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima) populations (Fig. 1; von Boguslawski 1984). In ancient Roman and Greek handbooks of agricultural production, the beet is described as a leaf crop. The root was, at that time, only used for medical purposes. In the 17th century the beet root is found as a vegetable in some recipes. Since the beginning of the 18th century the beet has been used as animal feed. However, it was not until after 1800 that fodder beet became an established crop in mixed farming systems in Europe. Sugar beet is considered to have originated from one of these fodder beet populations (Toxopeus 1984). Today, the most widely cultivated forms of Beta vulgaris are sugar beet, fodder beet, garden beet (beetroot), and leaf beet (Swiss chard, spinach beet).

Keywords

Sugar Beet Mesophyll Protoplast Protoplast Isolation Beet Necrotic Yellow Vein Virus Fodder Beet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bhat SR, Ford-Lloyd BV, Callow JA (1985) Isolation of protoplasts and regeneration of callus from suspension cultures of cultivated beets. Plant Cell Rep 4: 348–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhat SR, Ford-Lloyd BV, Callow JA (1986a) Isolation and culture of mesophyll protoplasts of garden, fodder and sugar beets using a nurse culture system: callus formation and organogenesis. J Plant Physiol 124: 419–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhat SR, Ford-Lloyd BV, Callow JA (1986b) Tissue and protoplast culture in cultivated beets. In: Horn W, Jensen CJ, Odenbach W, Schieder O (eds) Genetic manipulation in plant breeding. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 453–455Google Scholar
  4. Biyasheva AE Molotkovskii YuG (1990) Use of the fluorescent indicator fura 2 to measure the concentration of cytosolic Ca’ in protoplasts. Soy Plant Physiol 37: 460–464Google Scholar
  5. Bornman JF, Bornman CH, Bjorn LO (1982) Effects of ultraviolet radiation on viability of isolated Beta vulgaris and Hordeum vulgare protoplasts. Z Pflanzenphysiol 105: 297–306Google Scholar
  6. Coe GE, Steward D (1977) Cytoplasmic male sterility self-fertility, and monogermness in Beta maritima L. J Am Soc Sugar Beet Technol 19: 257–261Google Scholar
  7. Dalke L, Szota M (1986) A search for new sources of male sterility for breeding hybrid sugar beet varieties. Genet Pol. 27: 81–88Google Scholar
  8. De Bock ThSM (1986) The genus Beta: domestication, taxonomy and interspecific hybridization for plant breeding. Acta Hortic 182: 335–343Google Scholar
  9. De Greef W, Jacobs M (1979) In vitro culture of sugar beet: description of a cell line with a high regeneration capacity. Plant Sci Lett 17: 55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubinina IM, Kudryavtseva LF, Burakhanova EA (1989) Isolation and characterization of protoplasts and vacuoles from sugar beet leaf mesophyll. Sov Plant Physiol 3: 392–399Google Scholar
  11. Eady C, Warren G, Lindsey K, Jones MGK (1988) Electrofusion and electroporation of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) protoplasts. In Puite KJ, Dons JJM, Huizing HJ, Kool AJ, Koornneef M, Krens FA (eds) Progress in protoplast research. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 261–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Famelaer I, de Brouwer D, Negrutiu I, Jacobs M (1984) The transfer of genetic material in higher plants, through egg cell transformation and fusion with gamma-irradiated donor pollen or protoplasts. In: Novak FJ, Havel L, Dolezel J (eds) Proc Int Symp: Plant tissue and cell culture application to crop improvement. Czechoslovak Acad Sci, Prague, pp 417–418Google Scholar
  13. FAO (1989) Production year book. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  14. Ford-Lloyd BV, Bhat S (1986) Problems and prospects for the use of protoplasts in beet breeding. In: Horn W, Jensen CJ, Odenbach W, Schieder O (eds) Genetic manipulation in plant breeding. de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 437–440Google Scholar
  15. Frearson EM, Power JB, Cocking EC (1973) The isolation, culture, and regeneration of Petunia leaf protoplasts. Dev Biol 33: 130–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freytag AH, Anand SC, Rao-Ardelli AP, Owens LD (1988) An improved medium for adventitious shoot formation and callus induction in Beta vulgaris L in vitro Plant Cell Rep 7: 30–34Google Scholar
  17. Gallois P, Lindsey K, Malone R, Kreis M, Jones MGK (1992) Gene rescue in plants by direct gene transfer of total genomic DNA into protoplasts. Nucleic Acids Res 20: 3977–3982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Getz H-P, Knauer D, Willenbrink J (1987a) Transport of sugars across the plasma membrane of beetroot protoplasts. Planta 171: 185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Getz H-P, Schulte-Altedorneburg M, Willenbrink J (19876) Effects of fusicoccin and abscisic acid on glucose uptake into isolated beetroot protoplasts. Planta 171: 235–240Google Scholar
  20. Gilmour DM, Davey MR, Cocking EC (1989) Production of somatic hybrid tissues following chemical and electrical fusion of protoplasts from albino cell suspensions of Medicago sativa and M. borealis. Plant Cell Rep 8: 29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Günther G, Baumann I, Bogs R, Knösche R (1986) Comparative cytological investigations on protoplasts, tissue cultures and seedlings from Beta vulgaris (sugar-beet). In: Int. Symp Nuclear techniques and in vitro culture for plant improvement. IAEA/FAO, Vienna, pp 83–89Google Scholar
  22. Gupta P, Ganesh R, Mohanty P (1982) Effect of some senescence retardant pretreatments on yield of protoplasts from spinach beet (Beta vulgaris) leaves. Biochem Physiol Pflanz 177: 721–723Google Scholar
  23. Hall RD, Krens FA (1988) The production and electrofusion of Beta cytoplasts. In: Puite KJ, Dons JJM, Huizing HJ, Kool AJ, Koomneef M,Krens FA(eds) Progress in protoplast research. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht. pp 263–264Google Scholar
  24. Hall RD, Krens FA, Rouwendal GJA (1992a) DNA radiation damage and asymmetric somatic hybridization: is UV a potential substitute or supplement to ionising radiation in fusion experiments? Physiol Plant 85: 319–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hall RD, Rouwendal GJA, Krens FA (1992b) Asymmetric somatic cell hybridization in plants I. The early effects of (sub)lethal doses of UV and gamma radiation on the cell physiology and DNA integrity of cultured sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) protoplasts. Mol Gen Genet 234: 306–314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hall RD, Rouwendal GJA, Krens FA (1992c) Asymmetric somatic cell hybridization in plants Il. Electrophoretic analysis of radiation-induced DNA damage and repair following the exposure of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) protoplasts to UV and gamma rays. Mol Gen Genet 234: 315–324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hall RD, Pedersen C, Krens FA, (1993) Transfer of cytoplasm from new Beta CMS sources to sugar beet by asymmetric fusion. II. Improvements of protoplast culture protocols to enhance success in fusion experiments. Plant Cell Rep 12: 339–342Google Scholar
  28. Hall RD, Pedersen C, Krens FA (1994) Progress towards the development of a general somatic hybridization protocol for Beta. J Sugar beet Res (in press)Google Scholar
  29. Halldén C, Bryngelsson T, Bosemark NO (1989) Two new types of cytoplasmic male sterility found in wild Beta beets. Theor Appl Genet 75: 561–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Joersbo M, Brunstedt J (1990a) Direct gene transfer to plant protoplasts by electroporation by alternating, rectangular and exponentially decaying pulses. Plant Cell Rep 8: 701–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Joersbo M, Brunstedt J (1990b) Direct gene transfer to plant protoplasts by mild sonication. Plant Cell Rep 9: 207–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Joersbo M, Brunstedt J (1990e) Inoculation of sugar beet protoplasts with beet necrotic yellow vein virus particles by mild sonication. J Virol Methods 29: 63–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kallerhoff J, Perez P, Bouzoubaa S, Ben Tahar S, Perret J (1990) Beet necrotic yellow vein virus coat protein-mediated protection in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep 9: 224–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kao KN, Michayluk MK (1975) Nutritional requirements for growth of Vinca hajastana cells and protoplasts at very low density in liquid media. Planta 126: 105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krens FA, Hall RD (1992) Celbiologie legt basis voor cybride-productie. Prophyta 1: 12–16Google Scholar
  36. Krens FA, Jamar D (1988) Studies towards a protoplast isolation and culture procedure in sugar beet applicable to a variety of genotypes. In: Puite KJ, Dons JJM, Huizing HJ, Kool AJ, Koornneef M, Krens FA (eds) Progress in protoplast research. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 69–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Krens FA, Jamar D (1989) The role of explant source and culture conditions on callus induction and shoot regeneration in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). J Plant Physiol 134: 651–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Krens FA, Jamar D, Rouwendal GJA, Hall RD (1990) Transfer of cytoplàsm from new Beta CMS sources to sugar beet by asymmetric fusion. 1. Shoot regeneration from mesophyll protoplasts and characterization of regenerated plants. Theor Appl Genet 79: 390–396Google Scholar
  39. Li X-F, Chen Y-Q (1992) Direct embryogenesis from protoplasts of sugar beet. Acta Bot Sin 34: 402–404Google Scholar
  40. Lindsey K, Jones MGK (1987a) The permeability of electroporated cells and protoplasts of sugar beet. Planta 172: 346–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lindsey K, Jones MGK (1987b) Transient gene expression in electroporated protoplasts and intact cells of sugar beet. Plant Mol Biol 10: 43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lindsey K, Jones MGK (1989) Stable transformation of sugar beet protoplasts by electroporation. Plant Cell Rep 8: 71–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lörz H, Paszkowski J, Dierks-Ventling C, Portrykus I (1981) Isolation and characterization of cytoplasts and miniprotoplasts derived from protoplasts of cultured cells. Physiol Plant 53: 385–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Madsen PH, Pedersen HC (1990) Transfer of cytoplasmic male sterility from CMS plants to normal fertile sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) plants via asymmetric protoplast fusion. Abstr 7th Int Congr Plant tissue and cell culture, Amsterdam p 214Google Scholar
  45. Müller B, Ryschka U (1987) Effect of various osmotic substances on protoplast isolation by enzymes. Biochem Physiol Pflanz 182: 183–186Google Scholar
  46. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nam L-S, Landovà B, Landa Z (1976) Isolation of protoplasts from sugar beet leaves. Biol Plant 18: 389–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Owen FV (1945) Cytoplasmically inherited male sterility in sugar beet. J Agric Res 71: 423–440Google Scholar
  49. Pedersen C, Hall RD, Krens FA (1993) Petioles as the tissue source for the isolation and culture of Beta vulgaris and B. maritima protoplasts. Plant Sci 95: 89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pedersen HC, Larsen AB, Vamling K, Keimer B (1988) Inactivation of sugar beet protoplasts using acridine orange, an agent for late selection of fusion products. In: Puite KJ, Dons JJM, Huizing JH, Kool AJ, Koornneef M, Krens FA (eds) Progress in protoplast research. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 265–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ritchie GA, Short KC, Davey MR (1989) In vitro shoot regeneration from callus, leaf axils and petioles of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) J Exp Bot 40: 277–283Google Scholar
  52. Saumitou-Laprade P, Rouwendal GJA, Cuguen J, Krens FA, Michaelis G (1993) Different CMS sources found in Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima: mitochondrial variability in wild populations revealed by a rapid screening procedure. Theor Appl Genet 85: 529–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Saunders JW, Doley WP, Theurer JC, Yu MH (1990) Somaclonal variation in sugar beet. In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry vol. 11, Somaclonal variation in crop improvement 1. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 465–490Google Scholar
  54. Schlangstedt M, Hermans B, Zoglauer K, Schieder 0 (1992) Culture of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) protoplasts in alginate-callus formation and root organogenesis. J Plant Physiol 140: 339–344Google Scholar
  55. Schlangstedt M, Zoglauer K, Lenzner S, Hermans B, Jacobs M (1994) Improvement of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) protoplast culture: leaf petioles as a protoplast source. J. PI. Physiol. 143: 227–233.Google Scholar
  56. Schmidt R, Poole RJ (1980) Isolation of protoplasts and vacuoles from storage tissue of red beet. Plant Physiol 66: 25–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smolenskaya IN, Raldugina GN (1982) Protoplast culture from sugar beet cell suspensions. Soy Plant Physiol 28: 1022–1029Google Scholar
  58. Szabados L, Gagger C (1985) Callus formation from protoplasts of a sugar beet cell suspension culture. Plant Cell Rep 4: 195–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tétu T, Sangwan RS, Sangwan-Norreel BS (1987) Hormonal control of organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in Beta vulgaris callus. J Exp Bot 38: 506–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Toxopeus H (1984) De historie van de Europese Kruisbloemige en bietengewassen. Bedrijfsontwikkeling 15: 537–542Google Scholar
  61. van Ark HF, Hall RD, Creemers-Molenaar J, Krens FA (1992) High yields of cytoplasts from protoplasts of Lolium perenne and Beta vulgaris using density gradient centrifugation. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 31: 223–232Google Scholar
  62. von Boguslawski (1984) Zur Geschichte der Beta-Rübe als Kulturpflanze bis zum Beginn des 19. Jahrhunderts. In: Geschichte der Zuckerrübe, 200 Jahre Anbau und Züchtung. Dr. Albets Bartens, Berlin-Nikolassee, pp 13–21Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. D. Hall
    • 1
  • C. Pedersen
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. A. Krens
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Cell BiologyDLO-Centre for Plant Breeding and Reproduction Research (CPRO-DLO)WageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Danish Plant Breeding LtdStore HeddingeDenmark

Personalised recommendations