Skip to main content

Lie Transform Perturbation Theory

  • Chapter
Theory of Orbits

Part of the book series: Astronomy and Astrophysics Library ((AAL))

Abstract

Though the concept of the Lie transform dates back to more than a century ago, it is only in about the last thirty years that this concept has been introduced into perturbative theories and then applied on a vast scale in various fields of physics. As we recall in the course of this chapter, the field where the concept of the Lie transform was introduced for the first time is celestial mechanics and, incredibly, this concept is the only development of perturbation theory which cannot in some way be made to date back to Poincaré. Equally surprising is that the “old” canonical perturbation theory, in spite of the awkwardness involved by the use of a generating function with “mixed” variables, has ruled up until now, never falling into discredit, not even as a consequence of exaggerations like that of Delaunay, who had to calculate no less than 505 successive canonical transformations. We think that the record for absurdity has been set in plasma physics, where the use was established by somebody of quantizing classical systems, applying quantum perturbation theory (which provides more practical rules) and then letting the Planck constant h → 0 in the result. That was the situation until three decades ago. For these reasons, we thought it right to follow, in our exposition, wherever it has been possible, the chronological order in which the various contributions have appeared, at the end showing how the Lie transform method is substantially the right method for implementing KAM techniques. In this chapter, as in the preceding ones, we have tried to isolate what appeared to us to be the fundamental concepts and to insist on them, instead of dwelling upon the exposition of complicated examples or involved formulae for calculations. For the latter, the reader will find all the necessary information in the bibliographical notes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. Hori: Theory of general perturbations with unspecified canonical variables, Publ. Astron. Soc. Japan 18, 287–296 (1966)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Deprit: Canonical transformations depending on a small parameter, Celestial Mechanics 1, 12–30 (1969).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. See, for instance, M. Hausner, J. T. Schwarz: Lie Groups, Lie Algebras ( Gordon and Breach, New York, 1968 )

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. B. G. Wybourne: Classical Groups for Physicists ( Wiley, New York, 1974 ).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. For a demonstration of this and the subsequent propositions regarding Lie series, see W. Gröbner: Serie di Lie e loro applicazioni (Cremonese, Roma, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Gröbner: Die Lie-Reihen und ihre Anwendungen ( VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, 1960 ).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Shniad: The equivalence of Von Zeipel mappings and the Lie transform, Celestial Mechanics 2, 114–120 (1970).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. A. Kamel: Expansion formulae in canonical transformations depending on a small parameter, Celestial Mechanics 1, 190–199 (1969);

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. A. A. Kamel: Perturbation method in the theory of non-linear oscillations, Celestial Mechanics 3, 90–106 (1970).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. See, for instance, J. K. Hale: Oscillations in Nonlinear Systems (Dover, 1992 ), pp. 57–59.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The reader can find the (positive) result of this comparison in A. H. Nayfeh: Perturbation Methods (Wiley, 1973 ) p. 211.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See the (already quoted) paper by O. E. Gerhard, P. Saha: Recovering galactic orbits by perturbation theory, Mon. Not. R. Astr. Soc., 251, 449–467 (1991).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. A. J. Dragt, J. M. Finn: Lie series and invariant functions for analytic symplectic maps, Journal of Math. Phys. 17, 2215–2227 (1976).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. For the definition of p(n), see, for instance, M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun, eds., Handbook of Mathematical Functions (Dover, 1968), Sect. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  15. For a detailed comparison of the Deprit and Dragt-Finn transforms, see P. V. Koseleff: Comparison between Deprit and Dragt-Finn perturbation methods, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 58, 17–36 (1994).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Milani: Secular perturbations of planetary orbits and their representation as series, in Long-Term Dynamical Behaviour of Natural and Artificial N-Body Systems, ed. by A. E. Roy (Kluwer, 1988 ) pp. 73–108.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The example is taken from F. Verhulst: Nonlinear Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (Springer, 1990), Sect. 13. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. I. Arnold: Geometrical Methods in the Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations (Springer, 1983), chap. 5. J. Guckenheimer, P. Holmes: Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems and Bifurcations of Vectors Fields (Springer, 1983), Sect. 3. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. For a deeper understanding of the subject, see F. G. Gustayson: On constructing formal integrals of a Hamiltonian system near an equilibrium point, The Astronomical Journal 71, 670–686 (1966)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. J. M. Finn: Lie transform: a perspective, in Local and Global Methods of Nonlinear Dynamics (Lecture Notes in Physics, 252) ed. by A. W. Sâenz, W. W. Zachary, R. Cawley (Springer, 1985 ).

    Google Scholar 

  21. For a demonstration, see, for example, V. I. Arnold: Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, 2nd edn ( Springer, 1989 ), Appendix 7.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boccaletti, D., Pucacco, G. (1999). Lie Transform Perturbation Theory. In: Theory of Orbits. Astronomy and Astrophysics Library. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09240-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09240-8_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08222-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-09240-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics