Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Scientific Papers ((2875,volume A / 3))

  • 463 Accesses

Abstract

The customary notion of superselection rule stipulates the vanishing of those matrix elements of the density matrix that connect states separated by the superselection rule, i.e., the relative phases of which are, according to the superselection rule, meaningless. It is shown that, if any two states for which an additive conserved quantity has different values are separated for all physical systems by a superselection rule at one time, the separation will persist for all times. It is concluded that the states with different electric (or baryonic) charges are so separated. The reason for the difference between electric charge and other additive conserved quantities, such as momentum, is brought out.

Research supported in part by the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Reference

  1. R. Mirman, Phys. Rev. 186, 1380 (1969); V. Aharonov and L. Susskind, ibid. 155, 1428 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. P. Wigner, in Physikertag. Hauptvortraege Jahrestag. Verbandes Deut. Physik. Ges. (Physik Verlag, \Iosbach/Baden, 1962). The superselection rule for electric charge was first proposed by G.-C. Wick, A. S. Wightman, and E. P. Wigner, Phys. Rev. 88, 101 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  3. The reader who is familiar with (1), or is willing to take it for granted, should skip the present section.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Aharonov and L. Susskind, Ref. 1. This article already contains the form (5) for the “permissible” density matrix.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. Ref. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. P. Wigner and M. Yanase, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. 49, 910 (196.3). The more general statement referred to in the Introduction (and Ref. 2) is that if, with respect to an additive conserved quantity, the skew information is zero to begin with, it will remain zero throughout.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wick, G.C., Wightman, A.S., Wigner, E.P. (1997). Superselection Rule for Charge. In: Wightman, A.S. (eds) Part I: Particles and Fields. Part II: Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. The Scientific Papers, vol A / 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09203-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09203-3_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08179-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-09203-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics