Abstract
The major aim of therapy is prevention of fractures. It should be pointed out right away that there are considerable differences in both quality and credibility in results of randomised trials dealing with efficacy of various treatment schedules. When results of these clinical trials are assessed and compared, problems arise with respect to the following criteria:
-
Duration of the study
-
Number and age of the patients
-
Definition of exclusion criteria
-
Primary aim of the study
-
Fracture incidence versus fracture rate
-
Fractures prior to start of study
-
Definition of “fracture”
-
Definition of “control group”
-
Status of vitamin D and calcium
-
Method and accuracy of bone density measurements
-
Differences in statistics used for analysis
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bartl, R., Frisch, B. (2004). How to Treat Osteoporosis. In: Osteoporosis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09163-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09163-0_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40499-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-09163-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive