Advertisement

Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Treated by a Microsurgical Anterior Approach with or Without Interbody Fusion

  • S. Kadoya
  • R. Kwak
  • G. Hirose
  • T. Yamamoto

Abstract

Surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy has been less successful than operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy. These results of surgical treatment have led some authors recommended conservative treatment (5). Although it has been claimed that anterior disectomy with interbody fusion is a rational approach in terms of attacking directly the basic pathological process that causes the myelopathy and significant improvements have been reported after operative intervention (2, 6), it does potentially present the possibility of damaging the cervical cord, particularly when attempting to remove spondylotic osteophytes which frequently prove to be a main cause of the myelopathy (7). To help answer these conflicting questions we have performed a microsurgical anterior osteophytectomy with or without interbody fusion during the past six years and have carefully monitored the clinical status of these patients postoperatively. In this report, we briefly describe our operative procedures and present the neurological follow-up results which tend to emphasize the concept that an anterior osteophytectomy removing all those components compressing against the cervical cord and the roots is the treatment of choice for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Keywords

Interbody Fusion Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Cervical Cord Cervical Spondylosis Cervical Radiculopathy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Burrow, E.H.: The sagittal diameter of the spinal canal in cervical spondylosis. Clin. RadioL 14, 77–86 (1963)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hakuba, A.: Trans-unco-discal approach. J. Neurosurg. 45, 284–291 (1976)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murphy, M., Gado, M.: Anterior cervical discectomy without interbody bone graft. J. Neurosurg. 37, 71–74 (1972)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nurick, S.: The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain 95, 87–100 (1972)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lansford, L.D., Bissonette, D.J., Zorub, D.S.: Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease. Part 2: Treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in 32 cases. J. Neurosurg. 53, 12–19 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Phillips, D.: Surgical treatment of myelopathy with cervical spondylosis. J. NeuroL Neurosurg. Psychiat. 36, 879–884 (1973)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Verbiest, H.: The management of cervical spondylosis. Clin. Neurosurg. 20, 262–294 (1973)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilson, D.H., Campbell, P.D.: Anterior cervical discectomy without bone graft. ReportGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Kadoya
  • R. Kwak
  • G. Hirose
  • T. Yamamoto

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations