A Tale of two Bubbles: A Preliminary Look at the US Internet and Biotechnology Bubbles

  • Elizabeth Demers
  • Philip Joos
Conference paper


The term speculative bubble refers to a situation where prices diverge from their so-called “fundamental values” due to investor optimism rather than anything intrinsic to the values of the underlying assets themselves.1 Economic historians have documented that one of the hallmarks of a speculative bubble is “new era” thinking, or the belief that some new price-enhancing circumstance is present in the world that somehow justifies a permanently higher level of valuation (e.g., Galbraith (1993); Shiller (2000)). Despite the world’s long history of speculative bubbles (see, e.g., Kindleberger (2000) or Garber (2001) for a detailed historical perspective), Welch (2001) recently identified stock market “frenzies” such as the most recent US Internet stock bubble as one of the top 10 challenges yet to be addressed by empirical financial research. Technology market observers and casual empiricists such as Perkins and Perkins (1999) have remarked that the Internet stock bubble has numerous parallels with the US biotechnology bubble that preceded it by less than a decade. Consistent with the “new era” thinking associated with other past speculative manias, for example, both the biotechnology and Internet stock bubbles were characterized by a belief that the new technology underlying these then-nascent stage industries would be revolutionary in their impact on the human condition. What seems most surprising is that investors in US technology stocks did not appear to learn from the biotech bubble and we thereby witnessed a similar, albeit more extreme, cycle of upward and ultimately downward price spirals when the Internet industry emerged less than a decade later.


Stock Return Initial Public Offering Biotech Company Initial Return Biotechnology Firm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Biotech Industry Organization. (2002) Editors’ and Reporters’ Guide to Biotechnology 2002-2003: 148. Washington, DC: Biotechnology Industry OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  2. Demers E, Lev B (2001) A Rude Awakening: Internet Shakeout in 2000. Review of Accounting Studies, 6(2/3), June/September: 331 - 359Google Scholar
  3. Demers E, Lewellen K (2002) The Marketing Role of IPOs: Evidence from Internet Stocks. Journal of Financial Economics, forthcomingGoogle Scholar
  4. Ernst & Young. (2000) The Economic Contributions of the Biotechnology Industry to the U.S. Economy: Ernst & Young Economics Consulting and Quantitative AnalysisGoogle Scholar
  5. Galbraith JK (1993) A Short History of Financial Euphoria. New York: Whittle BooksGoogle Scholar
  6. Garber PM (2001) Famous First Bubbles. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Hand JRM (2001) The Role of Book Income, Web Traffic, and Supply and Demand in the Pricing of U.S. Internet Stocks. European Finance Review, 5 (3), 295 - 317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hand JRM (2002) The New Economy: Pricing of Securities. In: D. C. Jones (Ed.), New Economy Handbook. San Diego: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Kindleberger CP (2000) Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises (4th ed.): WileyGoogle Scholar
  10. Lowry M, Schwert W (2002) IPO market cycles: Bubbles or sequential learning? Journal of Finance, 57(3), June: 1171 - 1200Google Scholar
  11. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter (2002) The Technology IPO Yearbook: 8th Edition. New York: Morgan Stanley Equity ResearchGoogle Scholar
  12. Perkins AB, Perkins MC (1999) The Internet Bubble: Inside the Overvalued World of High Tech Stocks. New York: HarperGoogle Scholar
  13. Shiller RJ (2000) Irrational Exuberance. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Welch I (2001) The Top Achievements, Challenges, and Failures of Finance. Unpublished working paper, Yale University NovemberGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth Demers
  • Philip Joos

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations