Accelerator Mass Spectrometry in Protein Analysis

  • John S. Vogel
  • Darren J. Hillegonds
  • Magnus Palmblad
  • Patrick G. Grant
  • Graham Bench
Part of the Principles and Practice book series (PRINCIPLES)


Tools for protein quantitation have advanced through several phases. Common proteins in readily studied sources, albumin and globulins in plasma, were discovered in the nineteenth century and quantified by gravimetric mass determination of chemical precipitates. Finer fractionations and scales led to quantitation of increasingly less common proteins, but the method has obvious limits. Some proteins, enzymes, are quantified by their activity, measured as the increasing chemical product or a shrinking amount of substrate. No absolute quantitation of enzyme concentration is available without having a well-known standard for each enzyme expressing a particular action. Immunochemical methods successfully quantitate proteins, as long as antibodies are selective for the protein under study. Standard curves are required for quantification, since binding affinities are sensitive to assay conditions. Non-specific interactions further confound quantitation. Electrophoretic and chromatographic separations allowed analysis of even smaller concentrations, with quantitation accomplished through various optical properties, such as absorbance, fluorescence, or chemiluminescence. Not all proteins are responsive to the latter effects, and optical density measurements often have large uncertainties and poor sensitivity.


Alpha Particle Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Alpha Particle Energy Average Energy Loss SYBR Gold Nucleic Acid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arnott D, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF (1993). Mass Spectrometry of Proteins and Peptides-Sensitive and Accurate Mass Measurement and Sequence Analysis. Clinical Chemistry 39 (9): 2005–2010PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Berger MJ, Coursey JS, Zucker MA (2000). Stopping-Power and Range Tables for Electrons, Protons, and Helium Ions. NIST Information resource 4999:
  3. Buchholz BA, Arjomand A, Dueker SR, Schneider PD, Clifford AJ, Vogel JS (1999). Intrinsic erythrocyte labeling and attomole pharmacokinetic tracing of 14C-labeled folic acid with accelerator mass spectrometry. Analytical Biochemistry 269 (2): 348–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrington CD,Abou-Donia MB (1985). Characterization of [3H]di-isopropyl phosphorofluoridate-binding proteins in hen brain. Rates of phosphorylation and sensitivity to neurotoxic and non-neurotoxic organophosphorus compounds. Biochem J 228 (3): 537–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dingley KH, Curtis KD, Nowell S, Felton JS, Lang NP, Turteltaub KW (1999). DNA and protein adduct formation in the colon and blood of humans after exposure to a dietary-relevant dose of 2-amino-1-methyl-6- phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prey 8 (6): 507–12Google Scholar
  6. Dueker S, R., Lin Y, Buchholz BA, Schneider PD, Lame MW, Segall HJ, Vogel JS, Clifford AJ (2000). Long-term kinetic study of beta-carotene, using accelerator mass spectrometry in an adult volunteer. Journal of Lipid Research 41 (11): 1790–1800Google Scholar
  7. Giometti CS, Reich C, Tollaksen S, Babnigg G, Lim HJ, Zhu WH, Yates J, Olsen G (2002). Global analysis of a “simple” proteome: Methanococcus jannaschii. Journal of Chromatography B: Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical & Life Sciences 782 (12): 227–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gygi SP, Rist B, Griffin TJ, Eng J, Aebersold R (2002). Proteome analysis of low-abundance proteins using multidimensional chromatography and isotope-coded affinity tags. Journal of Proteome Research 1 (1): 47–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hughey BJ, Skipper PL, Klinkowstein RE, Shefer RE, Wishnok JS, Tannenbaum SR (2000). Low-energy biomedical GC-AMS system for C-14 and H-3 detection. Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section B-Beam Interactions with Materials & Atoms 172: 40–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keller A, Nesvizhskii AI, Kolker E, Aebersold R (2002). Empirical statistical model to estimate the accuracy of peptide identifications made by MS/MS and database search. Analytical Chemistry 74 (20): 5383–5392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lees JE, Richards PG (1999). Rapid, high-sensitivity imaging of radiolabeled gels with microchannel plate detectors. Electrophoresis 20 (10): 2139–2143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewis VE (1968). An Alpha-Particle Thickness Guage. Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research 64: 293–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mauthe RJ, Dingley KH, Leveson SH, Freeman S, Turesky RJ, Garner RC, Turteltaub KW (1999). Comparison of DNA-adduct and tissue-available dose levels of MeIQx in human and rodent colon following administration of a very low dose. International Journal of Cancer 80 (4): 539–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miyashita, M, Presley, JM, Buchholz, BA, Lam, KS, Lee, YM, Vogel, JS, and Hammock, BD (2001) Attomole level protein sequencing by Edman degradation coupled with accelerator mass spectrometry. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 98 (8): 4403–4408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Muller RA (1977). Radioisotope Dating With a Cyclotron. Science 196: 489–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nelson DE, Korteling RG, Stott WR (1977). Carbon-14: direct detection at natural concentrations. Science 198: 507–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nelson DE, Morlan RE, Vogel JS, Southon JR, Harrington CR (1986). New dates on northern Yukon artifacts: Holocene not upper Pleistocene. Science 232: 749–751Google Scholar
  18. Ognibene TJ, Bench G, Brown TA, Peaslee GF, Vogel JS (2002). A new accelerator mass spectrometry system for C-14-quantification of biochemical samples. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 218 (3): 255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rabilloud T, Vuillard L, Gilly C, Lawrence JJ (1994). Silver-Staining of Proteins in Polyacrylamide Gels-a General Overview. Cellular & Molecular Biology 40 (1): 57–75Google Scholar
  20. Richards P, Johnson M, Ray D, Walker C (1999). Novel protein targets for organophosphorus compounds. Chem Biol Interact 120: 503–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Synal HA, Jacob S, Suter M (2000). The PSI/ETH small radiocarbon dating system. Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section B-Beam Interactions with Materials & Atoms 172: 1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tuma RS, Beaudet MP, Jin XK, Jones LJ, Cheung CY, Yue S, Singer VL (1999). Characterization of SYBR gold nucleic acid gel stain: A dye optimized for use with 300-nm ultraviolet transilluminators. Analytical Biochemistry 268 (2): 278–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Turteltaub KW, Felton JS, Gledhill BL, Vogel JS, Southon JR, Caffee MW, Finkel RC, Nelson DE, Proctor ID, Davis JC (1990). Accelerator mass spectrometry in biomedical dosimetry: relationship between low-level exposure and covalent binding of heterocyclic amine carcinogens to DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 87 (14): 5288–5292PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vogel JS (1992). Rapid production of graphite without contamination for biomedical AMS. Radiocarbon 34: 344–350Google Scholar
  25. Vogel JS, Turteltaub KW, Finkel R, and Nelson DE. (1995). Accelerator Mass Spectrometry: Isotope Quantification at Attomole Sensitivity. Analytical Chemistry 67: 353–359Google Scholar
  26. Vogel JS, Keating GA, Buchholz BA (2002). Protein Binding of Isofluorophate in Vivo after Coexposure to Multiple Chemicals. Environmental Health Perspectives l l0 (Supplement 6): 1031–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • John S. Vogel
  • Darren J. Hillegonds
  • Magnus Palmblad
  • Patrick G. Grant
  • Graham Bench

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations