Scientific Objectivity with a Human Face

Four Reflections from a Pragmatist Point of View
  • Holm Tetens
Part of the The Frontiers Collection book series (FRONTCOLL)


The paper deals with four consequences of the pragmatist’s point of view that science is done by humans for humans and that we must, therefore, understand and describe how it is possible for us humans to do science and how we go about doing it. The four consequences are (1) the independence of reality as resistance, (2) the illusion of an unrestricted fallibilism, (3) intersubjectivity in sciences and the unavoidability of the expert dilemma, (4) the limits of explaining intersubjectivity.


Natural Science Human Face Scientific Objectivity Scientific Realism Social Interest 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albeverio, Sergio (1994), “Wiener and Feynman—path integrals and their Applications,” pp. 163–194. In: Peter Masani et al. (eds.; 1997), American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
  2. Albeverio, Sergio, PaoloGiordano, and FabioMinazzi (eds.; 2003 ), Proceedings of the Mendrisio Conference 2001, Foundations of mathematics today, in preparation.Google Scholar
  3. Atiyah, Michael, ArmandBorel, Gregory J. Chaitin, DanielFriedan, JamesGlimm, Jeremy J. Gray, Morris W. Hirsch, SaundersMacLane, Benoit B. Mandelbrot, DavidRuelle, AlbertSchwarz, KarenUhlenbeck, RenéThom, EdwardWitten, SirChristopherZeeman (1993), “Responses,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 30, pp. 161–177.Google Scholar
  4. Barwise, Jon and Etchemendy, John (1991), Tarski’s World 3.0. Stanford: Csli.Google Scholar
  5. Blum, Lenore, MikeShub, and SteveSmale (1989), “On a theory of computation…,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 21, pp. 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chaitin, Gregory J. (2002), Conversations With a Mathematician. Springer: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cini, Marcello (1999), “Errori di fatto,” Il Manifesto, 30 May 1999, pp. 25–26.Google Scholar
  8. Connes, Alain, AndreLichnerowicz, and Marcel P. Schützen-Berger (2001), Triangle of Thoughts. Providence: American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, Philip J., Hersh, Reuben (1986), Descartes’ Dream—The World According to Mathematics. Brighton: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, Philip J., Hersh, Reuben, Marchisotto, ElenaAnne (1995), The Mathematical Experience. With an introduction by Gian-Carlo Rota. Boston: Birkhäuser, Study Edition.Google Scholar
  11. Faris, William G. (2000), “Review of `Impostures Intellectuelles’,” Notice of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 45, pp. 874–876.Google Scholar
  12. Fenstad, Jens E. (2002), Tarski truth and natural languages. Oslo Preprint. Harris, Michael (2001), “Context of justification,” Mathematical Intelligencer, vol. 23, pp. 18–22.Google Scholar
  13. Heintz, Bettina (2000), Die Innenwelt der Mathematik—Zur Kultur und Praxis einer beweisenden Disiplin. Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Hersh, Reuben (1997), What Is Mathematics, Really? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Jaffe, J. Arthur and FrankQuinn (1993), “Theoretical Mathematics: towards a cultural synthesis of Mathematics and Theoretical Physics,” Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 29, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Masani, Peter R. and VidyadharMandrekar (eds.; 1997), Proceedings of the Norbert Wiener Centenary Congress1994. Providence: American Mathematical Society [First published in 1994 ].Google Scholar
  17. Manin, Yuri I. (1991), “Mathematics as Metaphor.” In: Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 1990. Kyoto: Mathematical Society Japan.Google Scholar
  18. Nelson, Edward (2003), “Sintassi e Semantica.” In: ALBEVERIO et al. (eds.; 2003 ).Google Scholar
  19. Putnam, Hilary (1993), Von einem realistischen Standpunkt. Hamburg: Rowohlts Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
  20. Russo, Lucio (22001), La rivoluzione dimenticata: Il pensiero scientifico greco e la scienra moderna. Mailand: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
  21. Tasic, Vladimir (2001), Mathematics and the roots of postmodern thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. T’hooft, Gerard (2001), “Can there be physics without experiments? Challenges and pitfalls,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 16, pp. 2895–2908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Holm Tetens

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations