Web Ontology Learning and Engineering: An Integrated Approach

  • Roberto Navigli
  • Paola Velardi
  • Michele Missikoff
Chapter

Abstract

The importance of domain ontologies is widely recognized, particularly in relationship to the expected advent of the so-called Semantic Web. An ontology is an infrastructure able to provide a precise account of the concepts characterizing a given application domain. It represents a shared understanding of a given reality, thus fostering better communication and cooperation among users, and interoperability among systems. Despite the significant amount of work in the field, ontologies are still scarcely used in Web-based applications. One of the main problems is the difficulty in defining the content, i.e., the identification and definition of relevant concepts in the domain. The solution proposed in this chapter starts from the idea that the corpus of documents produced by a community is the most representative (although implicit) repository of concepts. We present a method and a tool, OntoLearn — aimed at the extraction of knowledge from Web-sites and, more generally, from documents shared among the members of virtual organizations — to support the construction of a domain ontology.

Keywords

Entropy Transportation Income Beach Archeological Site 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 10.1
    R. Basili, M.T. Pazienza, P. Velardi: An Empirical Symbolic Approach to Natural Language Processing. Artificial Intelligence, 85, pp. 59–99 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 10.2
    T. Berners-Lee: Weaving the Web ( Harper, San Francisco, 1999 )Google Scholar
  3. 10.3
    C. Fellbaum: WordNet: an electronic lexical database (Cambridge, MIT press,1995)Google Scholar
  4. 10.4
    S. Harabagiu, D. Moldovan: Enriching the WordNet Taxonomy with Contextual Knowledge Acquired from Text. AAAI/MIT Press, 1999Google Scholar
  5. 10.5
    D.B. Lenat: CYC: a large scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Communication of the ACM, 3 (11) (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 10.6
    R. Krovetz: Homonymy and polysemy in Information Retrieval. Proceedings of ACL/EACL 1997 Google Scholar
  7. 10.7
    A. Maedche, S. Staab: Semi-automatic Engineering of Ontologies from Text. Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE’2000) Google Scholar
  8. 10.8
    A. Maedche, S. Staab: Learning Ontologies for the Semantic Web. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on the Semantic Web, Hongkong, China, May 2001 Google Scholar
  9. 10.9
    R. Milhalcea, D. Moldovan: eXtended WordNet: progress report. NAACL 2001Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources, Pittsbourgh, June 2001 Google Scholar
  10. 10.10
    M. Missikoff, X.F. Wang: Consys-A Group Decision-Making Support SystemFor Collaborative Ontology Building. In: Proc. of Group Decision and Negoti-ation 2001 Conference, La Rochelle, France, 2001 Google Scholar
  11. 10.11
    M. Missikoff: OPAL-A Knolwedge-Based Approach for the Analysis of Complex Business Systems (LEKS, IASI-CNR, Rome, 2000 )Google Scholar
  12. 10.12
    E. Morin: Automatic Acquisition of semantic relationships between terms from technical corpora. Proc. of 5th International Congress on Terminology and Knowledge extraction, TKE-99, 1999 Google Scholar
  13. 10.13
    B. Smith, C. Welty: Ontology: towards a new synthesis, Formal Ontology in Information Systems (ACM Press, 2001 )Google Scholar
  14. 10.14
    M. Uschold, M. Gruninger: Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 11 (2) (1996)Google Scholar
  15. 10.15
    P. Velardi, M. Missikoff, R. Basili: Identification of relevant terms to support the construction of Domain Ontologies. A CL-EACL Workshop on Human Language Technologies, Toulouse, France, July 2001242 R. Navigli, P. Velardi, M. MissikoffGoogle Scholar
  16. 10.16
    P. Velardi, M. Missikoff, P. Fabriani: Using Text Processing Techniques to Automatically enrich a Domain Ontology. Proc. of ACM Conf. On Formal Ontologies and Information Systems, ACM FOIS, Ogunquit, Maine, October 2001 Google Scholar
  17. 10.17
    P. Vossen: Extending, Trimming and Fusing WordNet for Technical Documents. NAACL 2001 workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources, Pittsbourgh, July 2001 Google Scholar
  18. 10.18
    T. Yokoi: The EDR electronic dictionary. Communications of the ACM, 38 (11) (1993)Google Scholar
  19. 10.19
  20. 10.20
    ECAI-2000 1st Workshop on Ontology Learning. http://o12000.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de
  21. 10.21
    EuroWordNet. http://www.hum.uva.nl
  22. 10.22
    Fetish EC project ITS-13015. http://fetish.singladura.com
  23. 10.23
    Harmonise EC project IST-2000–29329. http://dbs.cordis.lu
  24. 10.24
    IJCAI-2001 2nd Workshop on Ontology Learning. http://o12001.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de
  25. 10.25
    Semantic Web Community Portal.http://www.semanticweb.org
  26. 10.26
    SemCor The semantic concordance corpus. http://mind.princeton.edu
  27. 10.27
    SymOntos, a symbolic ontology management system. http://www.symontos.org
  28. 10.28
    WordNet 1.6. http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/~wn/w3wn.html
  29. 10.29

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roberto Navigli
    • 1
  • Paola Velardi
    • 1
  • Michele Missikoff
    • 2
  1. 1.Università di Roma “La Sapienza”Italy
  2. 2.IASI-CNRItaly

Personalised recommendations