Abstract
Sensory characteristics of food products are essential for consumers. It is a challenge for firms to maintain these characteristics constant, with as few variations in quality as possible. The control of quality properties and in particular sensory ones can be carried out using reliable process control strategies. Nevertheless, classical control approaches can rarely be used in food processes due in particular to the lack of real-time, reliable instrumental sensors, which limits available information on the product, and to poor understanding of the interactions between food and process. The scarcity of suitable on-line sensors is closely related to the variability of the raw material, the complexity of the biological phenomena during processing and the severe constraints that sensors must satisfy, such as hygiene, high humidity, and so on. As a consequence, some food product properties are very difficult to be quantified during food manufacture [11]. However, various solutions have been explored to overcome this problem: sensor design and adaptation, off-line measurements, software sensors [21]. Moreover, human evaluation is widely accepted as a tool for the evaluation of the quality of food products: operators play a major role in process control, since they take into account not only the information from sensors but also that from their own senses [20]. They can detect small changes in product characteristics such as cookie color after baking [12] thanks to their process knowledge and experience.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AFNOR (1994), Vocabulaire international des termes fondamentaux et généraux de métrologie, NF X 07–001
AFNOR NF ISO (1993), Analyse sensorielle–Guide général pour la sélection, l’entraînement et le contrôle des sujets. Partie 1: Sujets qualifiés, 8586–1
AFNOR NF ISO (1994), Analyse sensorielle–Guide général pour la sélection, l’entraînement et le contrôle des sujets. Partie 2: Experts, 8586–2
Agioux L (2003), Conception et validation d’un outil d’aide à l’estimation de l’état sensoriel de fromages en cours d’affinage-Application à l’affinage d’un fromage à pâte molle et à croûte fleurie. Ph.D. thesis, INA-PG, France
Curt C, Trystram G, Hossenlopp J (2001), Formalisation of at-line human evaluations to monitor product changes during processing. Integration of human decision in the dry sausage ripening process, Sciences des Aliments 21: 663–681
Curt C, Hossenlopp J, Perrot N, Trystram G (2002), Dry sausage ripening control–Integration of sensory-related properties. Food Control 13: 151–159
Eerikäinen T, Linko P, Linko S, Siimes T, Zhu YH (1993), Fuzzy logic and neural network applications in food science and technology, Trends in food Science and Technology 4: 237–242
Euzenat J (1996), Corporate memory through cooperative creation of knowledge bases and hyper-documents, In: 10th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Worshop, Banff, Canada, 36, pp 1–18
Hossenlopp J (1995), L’évaluation sensorielle appliquée aux produits laitiers, CIDIL, Paris, France
Issanchou S, Lesschaeve I (1993), La formation d’un jury d’analyse sensorielle, Ann. Fals. Exp. Chim. 86: 241–252
Pérez-Correa JR, Zaror CA (1993), Recent advances in process control and their potential applications to food processing, Food Control 4: 202–209
Perrot N, Trystram G, Guely F, Chevrie F, Schoesetters N, Dugre E (2000), Feed-back quality control in the baking industry using fuzzy sets, Journal of Process Engineering 23: 249–280
Perrot N, Agioux L, loannou I, Chevallereau V, Trystam G, Mauris G, Corrieu G (2002), A fuzzy symbolic approach to estimate the sensory state of a food product: application to cheese ripening. In: Food SIM2002, Cork, Ireland, pp 99–102
Poitou JP (1995), Documentation is knowledge. An anthropological approach to corporate knowledge management, In: 3rd International Symposium on the Management of Industrial and Corporate Knowledge, Compiègne, France, pp 91–103
Pomian J (1996), Mémoire d’entreprise - techniques et outils de la gestion du savoir, Les Editions Sapientia, Paris
Rozier J, Durand P (1969), La fabrication du saucisson sec, Rec. Méd. Vét. CXLV: 845–858
Sauvageot F (2000), Quelques questions auxquelles se trouve confrontée l’évaluation sensorielle en l’année 2000, Industries Alimentaires et Agricoles: 42–52
Schlich P (1993), Risk tables for discrimination tests, Food Quality and Preference 4: 141–151
Stone H, Sidel J, Oliver S, Woolsey A, Singleton RC (1974), Sensory evaluation by quantitative descriptive analysis, Food technology: 24–34
Trystram G, Danzart M, Treillon R, O’Connor B (1994), Supervision of food processes, In: Trystram G (eds) Automatic control of food and biological processes, Elsevier Science, Paris, pp. 441–448
Trystram G, Courtois F (1998), Automatique et industries alimentaires–quelques avancées, perspectives et limites, I.A.A.: 21–32
Wide P (1999), The human decision making in the dough mixing process estimated in an artificial sensor system, Journal of Food Engineering 39: 39–46
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Curt, C. et al. (2004). Formalization of at-line Human Evaluations to Monitor Product Changes during Processing: The Concept of Sensory Indicator. In: Ruan, D., Zeng, X. (eds) Intelligent Sensory Evaluation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07950-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07950-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-05791-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-07950-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive