Advertisement

Planning for Sustainability in the Belgian Electricity Sector: A Multi-criteria Mapping Exercise

  • Erik Laes
  • Gaston Meskens
  • Da Ruan
Chapter

Abstract

The Belgian parliament has recently voted a law to progressively phase out existing nuclear power plants1. This decision has roused quite some contestation between a number of historically active social groups in the energy policy debate. Referring to this relatively controversial climate, the research reported here aims to stretch the scope of the debate outside the boundaries of political (parliamentary) decision making. Broadly speaking, we attempt to shed some light on the question whether nuclear electricity generation can contribute to the transition towards a sustainable energy future for Belgium, and, if so, under which conditions. In this chapter, we will not go into the details of the substantial answers to these questions, but rather focus on some methodological aspects of the project.

Keywords

Nuclear Energy Energy Policy Sustainability Assessment Scientific Assessment Linear Additive Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bovy M, Laes E, Eggermont G (2003) Science, neutrality and objectivity in nuclear research: shared references or ideal types? In: Andersson K (ed) VALDOR 2003 Proceedings (June 9–13, Stockholm)Google Scholar
  2. Carpenter SR (2000) When are technologies sustainable? In: Society for Philosophy & Technology 1: 1–8Google Scholar
  3. European Commission, DG XII (Science, Research and Development ) (1995) ExternE — Externalities of Energy. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  4. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1990) Uncertainty and Quality in Science Policy. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for a post-normal age. Futures 25: 739–755 Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR, O’Connor M (1998) Challenges in the use of science for sustainable development. Int. J. Sustainable Development 1: 99–107Google Scholar
  6. Funtowicz SO, Shepherd I, Wilkinson D, Ravetz J (2000) Science and governance in theGoogle Scholar
  7. European Union: A contribution to the debate. Science and Public Policy 27: 327–336 Grin J, van de Graaf H, Hoppe R (1997) Interactieve Technology Assessment — Een eersteGoogle Scholar
  8. gids voor wie het wagen wil. Rathenau Instituut, Den HaagGoogle Scholar
  9. Haldi PA, Frei Ch, Beurskens L, Zhuikova N (2002) Multicriteria/multi-stakeholders comparative assessment of electricity generation scenarios in the sustainability context: a Swiss case study. Int. J. Sustainable Development 5: 102–124Google Scholar
  10. Hisschemöller M (1993) De democratie van problemen. De relatie tussen de inhoud van beleidsproblemen en methoden van politieke besluitvorming. VU Uitgeverij, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  11. Hobbs BF, Meier P (2000) Energy Decisions and the Environment — A guide to the use of multicriteria methods. Kluwer, Boston Dordrecht LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laes E, Meskens G (2002) Sustainable development and nuclear energy: Analysis of interviews with members of the Belgian Federal Council for Sustainable Development. (Research Report R-3682, SCK•CEN)Google Scholar
  13. Laes E, Meskens G (2003) An architecture for sustainability assessment: the case of nuclear energy in Belgium. In: Andersson K (ed) VALDOR 2003 Proceedings (June 9–13, Stockholm)Google Scholar
  14. Laes E, Meskens G, D’haeseleer W, Weiler R (2002) The Belgian nuclear phase out as a strategy for sustainable development: Unstructured problems, unstructured answers? (paper presented at the 2002 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, Dec. 6–7, Berlin)Google Scholar
  15. Rauschmayer F (2000) Ethics of multicriteria analysis. Int. J. Sustainable Development 3: 16–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rauschmayer F (2001) How to consider ethics in MCA? In: Colorni A, Paruccini M, Roy B (eds) Multiple criteria decision aiding. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 273–280Google Scholar
  17. Sachs W (ed) (1992) The Development Dictionary. A guide to knowledge as power. Zed Books, London New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Sachs W (1999) Planet Dialectics. Zed Books, London New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Salo A (1999) On the role of decision analytic modelling. In Stirling A (ed) On science and precaution in the management of technological risk — Vol. II Case studies. ( Final report of a project for the EC Forward Studies Unit under the auspices of the ESTO Network )Google Scholar
  20. Stirling A (1997a) Limits to the value of external costs. Energy Policy 25: 517–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stirling A (1997b) Multi-criteria mapping: Mitigating the problems of environmental valuation. In: Foster J (ed) Valuing nature. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Stirling A (ed) (1999) On science and precaution in the management of technological risk. (Final report of a project for the EC Forward Studies Unit under the auspices of the ESTO Network)Google Scholar
  23. Stirling A, Mayer S (1999) Rethinking risk — A pilot multi-criteria mapping of a genetically modified crop in agricultural systems in the UK. SPRU report No. 21. SPRU, SussexGoogle Scholar
  24. Webler T (1995) Right discourse in citizen participation: an evaluative yardstick. In: Renn O, Webler T, Wiedemann P (eds) Fairness and competence in citizen participation: evaluating models for environmental discourse. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 35–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wynne B (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning. Global Environmental Change 2: 111–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zaccaï E (2002) Le développement durable. Dynamique et constitution d’un projet. PIE Lang, Bruxelles Bern Berlin Frankfurt New York Oxford WienGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Laes
    • 1
  • Gaston Meskens
    • 1
  • Da Ruan
    • 1
  1. 1.The Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN)MolBelgium

Personalised recommendations