Skip to main content

Landslide Classification and Risk Management

  • Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on landslip types and presents their classification according to the kinematics, rate of movement and other features. Experience in slopes in many different regions, mainly in Hong Kong, Rio de Janeiro, Ecuador, Peru and Venezuela, is briefly described. This chapter also deals with slope management programmes in Hong Kong and Rio de Janeiro for landslip risk reduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Basabe P (1998) Prevención de desastres naturales en la cuenca del Rio Paute, Proyecto Pre-cupa, Informe final, vol I. Agencia Suiza para el Desarrollo y la Cooperación, Cuerpo Suizo de Socorro en Caso de Catastrofe

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden DM, Varnes DJ (1996) Landslide types and processes. In: Turner K, Schuster RL (eds) Landslides: investigation and mitigation. National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, Washington, Special Report 247, pp 36–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans SG, Clague JJ (1988) Catastrophic rock avalanches in glacial environments. Proc 5th Int Symp Landslides, Lausanne, vol 2, pp 1153–1158

    Google Scholar 

  • GeoRio (1997) GeoRio - 30 anos de alta tecnologia em contençâo de encostas. GeoRio, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidicini G, Nieble CM (1984) Estabilidade de Taludes Naturais e de Escavaçâo. Edgard Blücher, Sao Paulo, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu KJ (1975) On Sturzstroms Catastrophic debris streams generated by rockfalls. Bull Geol Soc Am 86: 129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson JN (1988) Morphological and geotechnical parameters of landslides in relation to geology and hydrogeology, General Report. Proc Int Symp Landslides, Lausanne, vol 1, pp 3–35

    Google Scholar 

  • JSA (2001) Sabo in Japan. Japan Sabo Society

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanji MA, Cruz PT, Massad F, Araujo HA (1997) Basic and common characteristics of debris flows. Proc 2nd PSL Pan-Am Symp on Landslides, Rio de Janeiro, vol 1, pp 232–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanji MA, Gramani MF, Massad F, Cruz PT, Araujo HA (2000) Main factors intervening in the risk assessment of debris flows. International Workshop on the Debris Flow Disaster of Dec 1999, Caracas, Venezuela

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone AW, Pun WK (1997) New engineering tools for landslip risk control. Proceedings of the 2nd Int Symp on Structures and Foundations in Civil Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, pp 1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Massad F, Cruz PT, Kanji MA, Aratíjo-Filho HA (2000) Characteristics and volume of sediment transport in debris flows in Serra do Mar, Cubatao, Brazil. International Workshop on the Debris Flow Disaster of Dec 1999, Caracas, Venezuela, JIFI/2000 (CD-Rom)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortigao JAR (1995) Soil mechanics in the light of critical state theories, AA Balkema, Rotterdam, 299 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Pnud (2000) Efectos de las lluvias caídas en Venezuela en diciembre de 1999. Informe elab-orado por el Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo, Caracas

    Google Scholar 

  • Sâenz SA, Gonzalez MV (1997) Deslizamiento de Puriscal: causas y soluciones. Proc 2nd

    Google Scholar 

  • PSL Pan Am Symp on Landslides, Rio de Janeiro, vol 1, pp 185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi T (1991) Debris flow. Monograph, IntAssocHydrol Res. Balkema, Rotterdam Van Dine DF (1985) Debris flows and debris torrents in the southern Canada Cordillera. Can Geotech J 22: 44–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movement types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (eds) Landslides: analysis and control. National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, Special Report 176, pp 11–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong HN, Ho KKS (1996) Travel distance of landslide debris. Proc of the 7th Int Symp on Landslides, Trondheim, Norway, vol 1, pp 417–422

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ortigao, J.A.R., Kanji, M.A. (2004). Landslide Classification and Risk Management. In: Handbook of Slope Stabilisation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07680-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07680-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07494-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-07680-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics