Advertisement

Aircraft Industry

  • M. Isaksson
  • M. Bruze

Abstract

The manufacture of aircraft is still characterized by craftsmanship, where traditional mechanical techniques, often combined with chemical techniques, are used for the assembly. Consequently, handling and exposure to chemicals are extensive.

Keywords

Contact Dermatitis Allergic Contact Dermatitis Phthalic Anhydride Phenol Formaldehyde Resin Aircraft Industry 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beck MH (1989) Experiences of contact dermatitis associated with phenol formaldehyde resins. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle J-M, Rycroft RJG, Sheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 374–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Björkner B (1992) Plastic materials. In: Rycroft RJG, Menné T, Frosch PJ, Benezra C (eds) Textbook of contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 540–567Google Scholar
  3. Bruze M (1988) Patch testing with a mixture of 2 phenol-formaldehyde resins. Contact Dermatitis 19:116–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruze M, Trulsson L, Bendsöe N (1992) Patch testing with ultrasonic bath extracts. Am J Contact Dermat 3:133–137Google Scholar
  5. Bruze M, Edenholm M, Engström K, Svensson G (1996) Occupational dermatoses in a Swedish aircraft plant. Contact Dermatitis 34:336–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burrows D (1983) Adverse Chromate reactions in the skin. In: Burrows D (ed) Chromium metabolism and toxicity. CRC press, Boca Raton, pp 137–163Google Scholar
  7. Burrows D, Fregert S, Campbell H, Trulsson L (1984) Contact dermatitis from the epoxy resins tetraglycidyl-4,4/-methylene dianiline and o-diglycidyl phthalate in composite material. Contact Dermatitis 11:80–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castelain P-Y, Com J, Castelain M (1992) Occupational dermatitis in the aircraft industry: 35 years of progress. Contact Dermatitis 27:311–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cronin E (1980) Metals. In: Cronin E (ed) Contact dermatitis. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 279–390Google Scholar
  10. Dahlquist I, Fregert S (1979) Contact dermatitis from volatile epoxy hardeners and reactive diluents. Contact Dermatitis 5:406–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hafner J, Rüegger M, Kralicek P, Eisner P (1995) Airborne irritant contact dermatitis from metal dust adhering to semisynthetic working suits. Contact Dermatitis 32:285–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hall AF (1944) Occupational contact dermatitis among aircraft workers. JAMA 125:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Handley J, Burrows D (1994) Dermatitis from hexavalent chromate in the accelerator of an epoxy sealant (PR1422) used in the aircraft industry. Contact Dermatitis 30:193–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mathias CGT (1987) Allergic contact dermatitis from a nonbis-phenol A epoxy in a graphite fiber reinforced epoxy laminate. J Occup Med 29:754–755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pirilä V (1950) Thiocol as a frequent cause of dermatitis. Acta Allergol 111:319–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rietschel RL, Fowler JF Jr (1995) Fisher’s Contact dermatitis, 4th edn. Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilkinson SM, Beck MH (1993) Allergic contact dermatitis from sealants containing polysulphide polymers (Thiocol ®). Contact Dermatitis 29:273–274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Isaksson
  • M. Bruze

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations