List of Patch-Test Allergens

  • B. J. Niklasson


Table 3 of contact allergens [1–13] provides basic chemical information and literature reference numbers to the Chemical Abstract Service and The Merck Index for a majority of commercially available allergens and for some allergens not available through a commercial source. An extensive list of synonyms is also given as an aid in identifying allergens through names stated on labels of products. For some allergens, colour index (C.I.) numbers are also given. The table is also designed to give information about general occurrence and areas of exposure for the allergens. To help the reader relate the allergen to the clinical picture as well as to select relevant allergens for patch testing, valuable information is given about airborne contact dermatitis, contact urticaria, cross reactions, lichen planus, pho-toallergic and phototoxic reactions, persistent light reactions, pigmentation, depigmentation and discoloration of the skin. INCI names (International Nomenclature of Cosmetic Ingredients) are also given for relevant allergens at the end of the paragraph.


Natural Rubber Acid Ethyl Ester Usnic Acid Glycidyl Phenyl Ether Dodecyl Gallate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Marks JG, DeLeo VA (1992) Contact and occupational dermatology. Mosby-Year Book, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rycroft RJ, et al. (1995) Textbook of contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Budavari S, et al. (1989) The Merck index, 11th edn. Merck and Co., Rahway, NJGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adams RM (1990) Occupational skin disease, 2nd edn. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Niklasson B (1998) Product catalogue 1998. Malmö, Chemotech-nique Diagnostics, website: Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nater P, Groot AC (1985) Unwanted effects of cosmetics and drugs used in dermatology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Groot AC (1986) Patch testing. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dooms-Goossens AE, et al. (1986) Contact dermatitis caused by airborne agents. J Am Acad Dermatol 15:1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dooms-Goossens AE, Deleu H (1991) Airborne contact dermatitis: an update. Contact Dermatitis 25:211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kabara JJ (1984) Cosmetic and drug preservation. Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Benezra C, et al. (1985) Plant contact dermatitis. Decker, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rietschel R, Fowler J, Fisher AA (1995) Fishers contact dermatitis, 4th edn. Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Herbst RA, Maibach HI (1991) Contact dermatitis caused by allergy to ophthalmic drugs and contact lens solutions. Contact Dermatitis 25:305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kalveram K-J, et al. (1980). Misleading patch test results with Aluminum Finn Chambers and mercury salts. Contact Dermatitis 6:507–508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fischer T, Maibach H (1985) Aluminum in Finn chambers reacts with cobalt and nickel salts in patch test materials. Contact Dermatitis 12:200–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lachapelle JM, Douka MA (1985) An evaluation of the compatibility between Aluminum Finn chambers and various mercurials dissolved in water or dispersed in petrolatum. Dermatosen 33:12–14Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lindeemayr H, Becerano S (1985) Interaction of mercury compounds and aluminum. Contact Dermatitis 13:274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kubo Y, et al. (1992) False positive reaction to patch testing with aqueous mercuric chloride in an aluminum Finn Chamber. Contact Dermatitis 26:136–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Björkner B, Niklasson B (1984) Influence of the vehicle on elicitation of contact allergic reactions to acrylic compounds in the guinea pig. Contact Dematitis 11:268–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bruze M, et al. (1995) Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from ethylcyanoacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 32:156–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kubo Y, et al. (1992) Does patch testing with ammoniated mercury in a Finn Chamber give a false positive reaction? Contact Dermatitis 27:118–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fischer T (1994) Design considerations for patch testing. Am J Contact Dermat 5:70–75Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Budavari S (1989) Aluminum and aliminium oxide. The Merck Index, 11th edn. Merck and Co., Rahway, NJ, pp 54–58Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Niklasson B (1995) In: Guin J (ed) Practical contact dermatitis. Appendix A. McGraw-Hill Inc, chap 51Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. J. Niklasson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations