Summary
We consider a special class of noncooperative bargaining games with incomplete information and two agents who bargain about the price of a given object. The object can be either of high value or of low value. Whereas the seller knows the real value, the buyer is not completely informed in that respect. With probability w he expects that the object is of low value and with the probability 1-w that it is of high value. The parameter w is common knowledge. One can therefore distinguish two types of the seller, namely the one who tries to sell an object of low value and the one who offers the more valuable object. To have something specific in mind, the commodity is assumed to be a work of art which can be either a fake or an original. The two types of the seller are accordingly called fake seller and honest seller. The buyer is of a unique type. Bargaining is supposed to proceed in form of a unanimity game, i.e., the players simultaneously determine their price offers. A contract results only if a seller and the buyer have chosen the same prices. As it is typical for bargaining games, the game has many equilibrium points. We apply the equilibrium selection theory of Harsanyi and Selten to determine a unique solution point for each of the bargaining games.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akerlof, G.E. (1970). The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. Quart. J. Econ., 84: 488–500.
Harsanyi, J.C. (1968). Games with Incomplete Information Played by “Bayesian” Players. Manag. Sci., 14: 159–182, 320–334, 486–502.
Harsanyi, J.C. (1975). The Tracing Procedure: A Bayesian approach to defining a solution for n-person non-cooperative games. Int. J. Game The., 4: 61–95.
Harsanyi, J.C. and R. Selten (1972). A Generalized Nash-Solution for 2-Person Bargaining Games with Incomplete Information. Manag. Sci., 18: 80–106.
Harsanyi, J.C. and R. Selten (1988). A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. Cambridge: MIT-Press.
Selten, R. (1975a). Bargaining under Incomplete Information–A Numerical Example -. In: O. Becker and R. Richter (eds.), Dynamische Wirtschaftsanalyse, Tübingen, 203–232.
Selten, R. (1975b). Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games. Int. J. Game Th., 4: 25–55.
Selten, R. and U. Leopold (1982a). Equilibrium Point Selection in a Bargaining Situation with Opportunity Costs. Economie Appliquée, x: 611–148
Selten, R. and U. Leopold (1982b). Gleichgewichtsauswahl in einer Gehaltsverhandlungssituation mit unvollständiger Information. In: Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, 126: 155- 162.
Spence, A.M. (1973). Job Market Signaling, Quart. J. Econ., 87: 355–379.
Spence, A.M. (1974). Market Signaling: Informational Transfer in Hiring and Related Screening Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Selten, R., Güth, W. (1991). Original or Fake — A Bargaining Game with Incomplete Information. In: Selten, R. (eds) Game Equilibrium Models III. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07367-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07367-4_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08110-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-07367-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive