Abstract
That strategic rivalry in a multiperiod decision situation might be quite different from one day affairs is well accepted in game theory. Repeating the game over and over allows players to repond to others’ actions and forces each player to visualize the reactions of his opponents. Hence, if a game is repeated an infinite number of times, the threat of retaliation becomes an enforcement mechanism which assures the cooperative behavior of the agents. This is, in a very crude and simple fashion, the message of the Folk Theorem.
We are grateful to W. Böge, E. v. Damme, J. Friedman, B. Kalkofen and R. Selten for critical comments. The usual disclaimer applies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aumann, R.J. (1981): “Survey on repeated games”. Essay in Game Theory and Mathematical Economics in Honor of Oskar Morgenstern, Bibliografisches Institut Mannheim: 11–22.
Aumann, R.J and L.S. Shapley (1976): Long term competition- a game theoretical analysis, Mimeo, Hebrew University.
Benoit, J.P. and V. Krishna (1985): “Finitely repeated games”. Econometrica 53: 1007–1029.
Coase, R.H. (1960): “The problem of social cost”. Journal of Law and Economics 3: 1–44.
Dam me v., E. (1987): Stability and perfection of Nash-equilibria. Springer Verlag, Berl in etc..
Friedman, J.W. (1985): ‘Trigger strategy equilibria in finite horizon supergames“. Journal of Economic Theory 35: 390–398.
Fudenberg, D. and E. Maskin (1986): “The Folk Theorem in repeated games with discounting and incomplete information”. Econometrica 54: 533–554.
Harsanyi, J.C. and R. Selten (1988): A general theory of equilibrium selection in Games. To appear.
Hellwig, M. and W. Leininger (1987): “On the existence of subgame-perfect equilibrium in infiniteaction games of perfect information”. Journal of Economic Theory 43: 55–75.
Kreps, D.M. and R. Wilson (1982): “Sequential equilibria”. Econometrica 50: 863–894.
Rubinstein, A. (1978): “Equilibrium in supergames with the overtaking criterion”. Journal of Economic Theory 21: 1–9.
Selten, R. (1965): “Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopols mit Nachfrageträgheit”. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 12: 301–324.
Selten, R. (1973): “A simple model of imperfect competition, where 4 are few and 6 are many”. International Journal of Game Theory 2: 141–201.
Selten, R. (1975): “Reexamination of the perfectness concept for equilibrium points in extensive games”. International Journal of Game Theory 4: 25–55.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Güth, W., Leininger, W., Stephan, G. (1991). On Supergames and Folk Theorems: A Conceptual Discussion. In: Selten, R. (eds) Game Equilibrium Models II. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07365-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07365-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08109-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-07365-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive