Abstract
Newtonian Classical Mechanics (NCM) suffers from several kinds of chaotic indeterminacy. These shortcomings can be repaired in a simple and obvious manner. The NCM theory is thereby transformed into a new (probabilistic) theory which is fully equivalent to the Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics of Heisenberg, Schröinger, and Dirac with the Max Born probabilistic interpretation of the state function built in from the start. I call this new theory Super Classical Quantum Mechanics, (SCQM). With the help of Paul Ehrenfest’s 1927 theorem, the classical limit of the new theory, SCQM, gives exactly the results expected of an improved Newtonian theory of Classical Mechanics. This approach offers enormous advantages, not only for a physically reasonable interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, but also for its contribution to the Quantum Theory of Measurement, and for the avoidance of all of the so-alled paradoxes of traditional non? relativistic Quantum Mechanics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W. E. Lamb, Jr. “On the Electromagnetic Properties of Nuclear Systems”, Part 2 of Ph. D. Thesis, U. C., Berkeley, Phys. Review, 53, 651–656, (1938).
W. E. Lamb, Jr. “Suppose Newton had invented Wave Mechanics”, Am. J. Phys. 62, 201–206 (1994).
W. E. Lamb, Jr. “The Borderland between Quantum and Classical Mechanics”, Physica Scripta T70, 7–13 (1997).
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “An Operational Interpretation of Non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics”, Physics Today, 22, 23–28, (1969).
J. von Neumann, “Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics”, English Translated by R. T. Beyer, (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N. Y.)
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Von Neumann’s Reduction of the Wave Function”, in The Centrality of Science and Absolute Values, Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Unity of the Sciences, pp. 297–303 ( ICF Press, N.Y., N.Y. 1975 ).
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Remarks on the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics,” in Science of Matter, ed. S. Fujita, pp. 1–8, ( Gordon and Breach, New York, 1979 ).
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “A Letter to Kip Thorne”, in CCNY Physics Symposium, in Celebration of Melvin Lax’s Sixtieth Birthday, ed. H. Falk, pp. 40–43, ( City University of New York, 1983 ).
E. Arthurs and J. Kelly, “On the Simultaneous Measurement of a Pair of Conjugate Observables”, Bell System Technical Journal 44, 725–729 (1965).
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Quantum Theory of Measurement”, Annals, New York Academy of Sciences, 480, pp. 407–416 (1986).
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Theory of Quantum Mechanical Measurements” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: In the light of new technology, ed. M. Namiki, pp. 185–192 ( Japan Physical Society, 1987 ).
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Sequential Measurements in Quantum Mechanics”. Lecture at Como NATO Advanced Research Workshop in Quantum Optics, September, 1986. In Quantum Measurement and Chaos, ed. E. R. Pike and S. Sarkar, pp. 183–193 ( Plenum Press, New York and London, 1987 ).
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Classical Measurements on a Quantum Mechanical System” in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Spacetime Symmetries, eds. Y. S. Kim and W. M. Zachary, pp. 197–201, reprinted from Nuclear Physics B (Proc. Suppl.) 6, 1989 ( North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1989 ).
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Quantum Theory of Measurement”, Lecture at Turin NATO Advanced Research Workshop on Noise and Chaos in Nonlinear Dynamical Systems, March, 1989, eds. F. Moss, L. Lugiato, W. Schleich, pp. 1–14, (Cambridge University Press, 1990 ).
J. A. Wheeler and W. H. Zurek, eds. “Quantum Theory and Measurement”, (Princeton University Press, 1983 ).
S. Goldstein, in Physics Today, vol. 22, March and April Issues, 1996.
Schrödinger Cat Paradox: Translated to English in Ref. 15, pp. 152–167.
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Schrödinger’s Cat” in “Paul Adrian Maurice Dirac”, eds. B. N. Kursuoglu and E. P. Wigner (Cambridge University Press, 1987 ).
Physics Today
Physics World
Delayed Choice
Comments by W. E. Lamb“, in Workshop on Quantum Cryptography and Quantum Computing, Proceedings, February 15, 1995, edited by H. Everitt, U. S. Army Research Office, pp. 24–25.
Max Born, “On the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”, in Les Prix Nobel en 1954, Stockholm.
W. E. Lamb, Jr. and H. Fearn, “Classical Theory of Measurement: A Big Step Toward the Quantum Theory of Measurement”, in “Amazing Light”: A Volume Dedicated to Charles Hard Townes on his 80th Birthday, (Edited by R. V. Chiao) Springer-Verlag, New York, N.Y.).
See biography of Luisa Agnesi, and article on special functions in Encyclopedia Britanica.
J. G. Crowther, “Maxwell’s Inaugural Lecture”, New Scientist and Science Journal, (4 March, 1971 ), pp. 478–481.
H. Poincare “New Methods of Celestial Mechanics”, in 3 vols., ed. by D. L. Goroff, ( A. I. P., 1993 ).
W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Quantum Chaos and the Theory of Measurement”, NATO Advanced Research Workshop on “Quantum Chaos”, Como, June, 1983. In “Chaotic Behavior in Quantum Systems. Theory and Applications”, ed. G. Casati, pp. 253–261. ( Plenum Press, New York, 1985 ).
J. Lighthill, “The Recently Recognized Failure of Predictability in Newtonian Dynamics”, Proc. Roy. Soc. A407, 35–50 (1936).
G. Duffing, “Forced Vibrations at Various Frequencies and their Technical Significance”, Sammlung 41–42 ( F. Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1918 ).
E. Fermi, J. R. Pasta, and S. Ulam, “Studies of Noninear Problems”, in Los Alamos Report LA-1940, 1955.
M. Toda, J. Phys. Soc. Japan 21, 431 (1967).
M. Born, Waynflete Lecture, Magdelen College, Oxford, 1949.
P. Ehrenfest, “Notes on the Approximate Validity of Quantum Mechanics”, Z. Physik, 455–457 (1927).
L I Schiff, “Quantum Mechanics”, 3rd ed., pp. 28–30, 178–182, (Mc-Graw-Hill, 1955 ).
E. Schrödinger, “Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics”, ( Blackie, London, 1928 ).
E. H. Kennard, “The Quantum Mechanics of Simple Types of Motion”, Z. Phys. 44, 326–352 (1927).
R. J. Glauber, “Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field”, Phys. Rev. 2766–2788 (1964).
M. Sargent, M. O. Scully and W. E. Lamb, Jr., “Laser Physics”, in Appendix H, “The Coherent State”, (Wiley, 1977 ). Largely based on Kennard’s approach. Many results are simpler to get using the complex Gaussian method of this paper.
W. E. Lamb, Jr. “Anti-Photon”, Applied Physics B, Lasers and Optics, 60, 77–84 (1995).
J. Bolte and S. Keppeler, “Semiclassical Time Evolution and Trace Formula for Relativistic Spin-2 1 Particles” Phys. Rev. Letters, 81, 1987–1990 (1998).
M. V. Berry. From a Lecture in May, 1999, at the University of Arizona.
T. A. Welton, “Some Observable Effects of the Quantum Mechanical Fluctuation of the Electromagnetic Field”, Phys. Rev. 74, 1157–1167 (1948).
S. Bourzeix, et al, “High Resolution Spectroscopy of the Hydrogen Atom: Determination of the 1S Lamb Shift.”, Phys. Rev. Letters, 76, 384–387 (1996).
See Einstein’s Remarks on Radioactive Decay in “Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist”, pp. 665–688, edited by P. A. Schilpp. (Open Court Publishing, La Salle, IL, 1970).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lamb, W.E. (2000). Super Classical Quantum Mechanics: The Interpretation of Non-Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. In: Xu, Z., Xie, S., Zhu, SY., Scully, M.O. (eds) Frontiers of Laser Physics and Quantum Optics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07313-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07313-1_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08644-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-07313-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive