Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants ((FAMILIES GENERA,volume 5))

Abstract

Annual, biennial, or perennial herbs, subshrubs, shrubs, or rarely small trees or vines, containing glucosinolates (mustard-oil glucosides). Indumentum lacking or of simple, furcate, dendritic, or stellate, unicellular trichomes, very rarely with additional uni- or multicellular glands. Leaves alternate or very rarely opposite, sometimes confined to a basal rosette, exstipulate, simple, entire or lobed to pinnatisect, rarely pinnate or palmate; stomata usually anisocytic. Inflorescences indeterminate, racemes or rarely spikes, often aggregated, usually ebracteate. Flowers hypogynous, actinomorphic or rarely zygomorphic, perfect or very rarely imperfect. Sepals 4, imbricate, almost always free, usually caducous; lateral (inner) pair often saccate or very rarely spurred. Petals 4, rarely absent, alternating with sepals, free, usually clawed, imbricate, entire or rarely divided. Stamens usually 6, rarely 2 or 4, or very rarely 8–24, usually outer 2 shorter than inner 4 (tetradynamous), rarely equal in length or in 3 pairs of different length; filaments filiform, sometimes winged or appendaged at base, free or rarely those of median pairs connate; anthers tetrasporangiate, introrse or extrorse. Nectar glands receptacular, of various shapes, sizes, and dispositions around filament bases. Gynoecium 2-carpellate, syncarpous, sessile or rarely stipitate, 2-locular with a false septum or rarely unilocular; ovules 1–300, campylotropous or anatropous, bitegmic, crassinucellate or more rarely tenuinucellate, usually pendulous. Fruit typically a bivalved capsule usually dehiscing longitudinally from below, commonly called a silique (when 3 or more times longer than wide) or silicle (when less than 3 times longer than wide), or fruit indehiscent, nut-like, schizocarpic, samaroid, or lomentaceous. Seeds almost exalbuminous, winged or wingless, seed coat sometimes mucilaginous when wetted; embryo oily, strongly curved or variously folded; germination epigeal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  • Abraham, M. 1885. Bau und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Wandverdickungen in den Samenoberhautzellen einiger Cruciferen. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 16: 599–637.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahuja, Y.R., Bhaduri, P.N. 1956. The embryology of Brassica campestris L. var. toria Duth. & Full. Phytomorphology 6: 63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, I. 1952. Entwicklungsstudien an Blüten von Cruciferen und Papaveraceen. Planta 41: 125–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, H.H. 1961. Cruciferae. Fl. N. Z. 1: 174–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1973. The biosystematics of the genus Thelypodium (Cruciferae). Contrib. Gray Herb. 204: 3– 148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1977. Protogyny in the Cruciferae. Syst. Bot. 2: 327–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1984. The tribes of Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 65: 343–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1985a. The genera of Brassiceae (Cruciferae) in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 66: 279–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1985b. The genera of Thelypodieae (Cruciferae) in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 66: 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1986. The genera of Lepidieae (Cruciferae; Brassicaceae) in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 67: 265–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1989. Systematics and phylogeny of Schizopetalon (Brassicaceae). Harvard Pap. Bot. 1: 10– 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1994. Three new South American species of Draba (Brassicaceae). Novon 4: 197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 2000. A revision of Pegaeophyton (Brassicaceae). Edinb. J. Bot. 57: 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 2001. A review of gamosepaly in the Brassicaceae and a revision of Desideria, with a critical evaluation of related genera. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 87: 549–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A., Al-Shammary, K.I. 1987. Distribution and chemotaxonomic significance of glucosinolates in certain Middle-Eastern Cruciferae. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 15: 559– 569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A., Iltis, H. 1993. Romanschulzia mexicana (Brassicaceae), a remarkable new species from Guerrero Mexico. Novon 3: 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A., Warwick, S.I. 1997. The generic disposition of Quidproquo confusum and Sinapis aucheri (Brassicaceae). Novon 7: 219–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A., Yang, G. 1998. Notes on Chinese Cardamine (Brassicaceae). Harvard Pap. Bot. 3: 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A., O’Kane, S.L. Jr., Price, R.A. 1999. Generic placement of species excluded from Arabidopsis (Brassicaceae). Novon 9: 296–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shehbaz, I.A., Arai, K., Ohba, H. 2000. A revision of the genus Lignariella (Brassicaceae). Harvard Pap. Bot. 5: 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel, O. 1999. The so-called “beak”, a character in the systematics of Brassicaceae? Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 121: 85– 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel, O., Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1997. Re-evaluation of the tribe Heliophileae (Brassicaceae). Mitt. Inst. Allg. Bot. Hamburg 27: 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appel, O., Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 2001. Dolichorhynchus is united with Douepea (Brassicaceae). Novon 11: 296–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelqvist, L.A. 1976. Lipids in the Cruciferae. In: Vaughan, J.G., Macleod, A.J., Jones, B.M.G. (eds.) The biology and chemistry of the Cruciferae. London: Academic Press, pp. 221–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arber, A. 1931. Studies in floral morphology. 1. On some structural features of the cruciferous flower. New Phytol. 30: 11–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bannier, J.P. 1923. Untersuchungen über apogame Fortpflanzung bei einigen elemataren Arten von Erophila verna. Recueil Trav. Bot. Néerl. 20: 1–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barcley, A.S., Gentry, H.S., Jones, Q. 1962. The search for new industrial crops 2: Lesquerella as a source of new oilseeds. Econ. Bot. 16: 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A.J. 1955a. Note on dioecy in the Cruciferae. Heredity 9: 415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A.J. 1955b. Self-incompatibility systems in angiosperms. 3. Cruciferae. Heredity 9: 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, A. 1905. Beiträge zur systematischen Gliederung der Cruciferen. Bot. Centralbl. 18: 119–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H.F. 1961. Oligocene plants from the upper Ruby River Basin, southwestern Montana. Mem. Geol. Soc. Am. 82: 1–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, H.D. 1981. Sieve-element characters. Nord. J. Bot. 1: 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, H.D., Eschlbeck, G. 1978. Dilated cisternae in Capparales–an attempt towards the characterization of a specific endoplasmatic reticulum. Protoplasma 97: 351–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I.A. Al-Shehbaz

    Google Scholar 

  • Böcher, T.W. 1951. Cytological and embryological studies in the amphi-apomictic Arabis holboellii complex. Biol. Skr. 6: 1–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocquet, G. 1959. The campylotropous ovule. Phytomorphology 9: 222–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgen, L. 1987. Lobularia (Cruciferae). A biosystematic study with special reference to the Macaronesian region. Opera Bot. 91: 1–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouman, F. 1975. Integument initiation and testa development in some Cruciferae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 70: 213–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouman, J.L., Brüggemann, H., Lee, J.Y., Mummenhoff, K. 1999. Evolutionary changes in floral structure within Lepidium L. (Brassicaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 160: 917–929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker, J.L. 1967. The distribution and phylogenetic significance of binucleate and trinucleate pollen grains in the angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 54: 1069–1083.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R.R., Morrison, R.S., Reeves, R.D., Dudley, T.R., Akman, Y. 1979. Hyperaccumulation of nickel by Alyssum L. (Cruciferae). Proc. Roy. Soc. L. and., Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 203: 387–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brückner, C. 1996. Carpelloid stamens in Papaveraceae Juss. and Brassicaceae Burnett (Cruciferae Juss.) and their bearing on theories of gynoecium organization. Feddes Repert. 107: 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brückner, C. 2000. Clarification of the carpel number in Papaverales, Capparales, and Berberidaceae. Bot. Rev. 66: 155–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist, S. 1971. Wood anatomy of Macaronesian and other Brassicaceae. Aliso 7: 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauhan, E. 1979. Pollination by ants in Coronopus didymus (L.) Sm. Int. Q. J. Plant Sci. Res. 6: 39–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemente Muñoz, M., Hernandez Bermejo, J.E. 1978. El aparato nectarigeno en la tribu Brassiceae (Cruciferae). Ann. Inst. Bot. Cavanilles 35: 279–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E.J.H. 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couper, R.A. 1960. New Zealand Mesozoic and Cainozoic plant microfossils. N. Z. Geol. Surv. Paleontol. Bull. 32: 1– 88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, P. 1976. Trends in the breeding and cultivation of cruciferous crops. In: Vaughan, J.G., Macleod, A.J., Jones, B.M.G. (eds.) The biology and chemistry of the Cruciferae. London: Academic Press, pp. 69–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, P.J., Made, P.M. 1971. Cucurbitacins from the Cruciferae. Phytochemistry 10: 3081–3083.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R. 1975. A system of classification of the angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the distribution of characters. Bot. Notiser 128: 119–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R. 1977. A commentary on a diagrammatic presentation of the angiosperms in relation to the distribution of character states. Plant Syst. Evol. Suppl. 1: 253– 283.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Arbaumont, J. 1890. Nouvelles observations sur les cellules à mucilage des graines de Crucifères. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. VII, 11: 125–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, V.S.R., Rao, K.N. 1975. Phytochemical phylogeny of the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) from the Capparidaceae. Naturwissenschaften 62: 577–578.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daxenbichler, M.E., Etten, C.H. v., Brown, F.S. 1964. Oxazolidinethiones and volatile isothiocyanates in enzyme-treated seed meals from 65 species of Cruciferae. Agric. Food Chem. 12: 127–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Candolle,A.P.1821a. Cruciferae. In: Systema Naturale. Paris: Treuttel & Würtz, pp. 139–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Candolle, A.P. 1821b. Mémoire sur la famille des Crucifères. Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. 7: 169–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, Y., Hu, Z. 1995. The comparative morphology of the floral nectaries of Cruciferae. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 33: 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorák, F. 1973. The importance of the indumentum for the investigation of evolutional relationship in the family Brassicaceae. Oesterr. Bot. Z. 121: 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eames, A.J., Wilson, C.L. 1928. Carpel morphology in the Cruciferae. Am. J. Bot. 15: 251–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eames, A.J., Wilson, C.L. 1930. Crucifer carpels. Am. J. Bot. 17: 638–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, A.W. 1865. Ueber den Blüthenbau der Fumariaceen, Cruciferen und einiger Capparideen. Flora 48: 433–444, 449–460,497–508,513–521, 529–536, 545–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Menshawi, B., Karawya, M., Wassel, G. 1980. Glucosinolates in the genus Zilla (Brassicaceae). Lloydia 43: 534– 536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Endress, P.K. 1992. Evolution and floral diversity: The phylogenetic surroundings of Arabidopsis and Antirrhinum. Int. J. Plant Sci. 153: S106–S122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engler, A. 1904. Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 3. Berlin: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdtman, G. 1952. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, W.R. 1963. The genera of Capparaceae and Moringaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 44: 81– 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettlinger, M.G., Kjaer, A. 1968. Sulfur compounds in plants. In: Mabry, T.J., Alston, R.E., Runeckles, V.C. (eds.) Recent Advances in Phytochemistry 1: 59–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedtchenko, B.A. 1939. Megacarpaea. In: Komarov, V.L. (ed.) Flora of the U.S.S.R. Vol. 8. Moskva Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo Akademii Nauk S.S.S.R., pp. 543–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny, P. 1977. Defensive ecology of the Cruciferae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 64: 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, A.J. 1976. The seed protein contents of some Cruciferae. In: Vaughan, J.G., Macleod, A.J., Jones, B.M.G. (eds.) The biology and chemistry of the Cruciferae. London: Academic Press, pp. 279–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fursa, N.S., Belyaeva, L.E., Avetisian, V.E. 1986. Natural compounds of the family Brassicaceae as possible chemotaxonomic characters. Report 4. Glucosinolates, alkaloids, sinapine. Rastitel’n. Resursy 22: 449–474.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gershenzon, J., Mabry, T.J. 1983. Secondary metabolites and the higher classification of angiosperms. Nord. J. Bot. 3: 5–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glück, H. 1919. Blatt-und blütenmorphologische Studien. Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmelin, R., Kjaer, A. 1970. Glucosinolates in Matthiola fruticulosa and related species: a reinvestigation. Phytochemistry 9: 569–573.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Campo, C. 1980. Morphology and morpho-taxonomy of the tribe Brassiceae. In: Tsunoda, S., Hinata, K., Gómez-Campo, C. (eds.) Brassica crops and wild allies. Tokyo: Japan Scientific Societies Press, pp. 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Campo, C. 1999. Taxonomy. In: Gómez-Campo, C. (ed.) Biology of Brassica coenospecies. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, C.W. 1978. A nomarski interference study of megasporogenesis and megagametogenesis in Smelowskia calycina (Cruciferae). Am. J. Bot. 65: 353–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubert, M. 1974. Studies on the distribution of myxospermy among seeds and fruits of Angiospermae and its ecological importance. Acta Biol. Venez. 8: 315–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guignard, L. 1890. Recherches sur la localization des principes actifs des Crucifères. J. Bot. (Morot) 4: 385–394, 412–430, 435–455. 171

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakki, M.I. 1974. Embryologische und morphologische Beobachtungen an Succowia balearica (L.) Medik. (Brassicaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 94: 360–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannig, E. 1901. Untersuchungen über die Scheidewände der Cruciferenfrüchte. Bot. Zeitung Berlin, 2. Abt. 59: 207– 245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberd, D.J. 1976. Cytotaxonomic studies of Brassica and related genera. In: Vaughan, J.G., Macleod, A.J., Jones, B.M.G. (eds.) The biology and chemistry of the Cruciferae. London: Academic Press, pp. 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriman, N.A. 1965. The genus Dentaria L. (Cruciferae) in eastern North America. Ph.D. Thesis. Nashville, Tennessee: Vanderbilt University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasapis, X., MacLeod, A.J., Moreau, M. 1981. Glucosinolates of nine Cruciferae and two Capparaceae species. Phytochemistry 20: 2355–2358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, A. 1911. Entwurf eines Cruciferen-Systems auf phylogenetischer Grundlage. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 27: 127– 335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedge, I.C. 1976. A systematic and geographical survey of the Old World Cruciferae. In: Vaughan, J.G., Macleod, A.J., Jones, B.M.G. (eds.) The biology and chemistry of the Cruciferae. London: Academic Press, pp. 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedge, I.C., Kjaer, A., Malver, O.1980. Dipterygium–Cruciferae or Capparaceae? Notes Bot. Gard. Edinburgh 38: 247– 250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R. 1962, 1964, 1989. See general references. Heinricher, E. 1888. Die Eiweißschläuche der Cruciferen und verwandte Elemente in der Rhoeadinenreihe. Mitt. Bot. Inst. Graz 1: 1–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, F.D., Feldman, L.J. 1994. Bi-directional inflorescence development in Arabidopsis thaliana: Acropetal initiation of flowers and basipetal initiation of paraclades. Planta 192: 276–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, H.J. 1982a. Brassicaceae. In: Briggs, B.G. et al. (eds.) Flora of Australia 8: 231–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewson, H.J. 1982b. The genus Lepidium L. (Brassicaeae) in New Guinea. Brunonia 5: 73–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, F. 1879. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Saftdrüsen der Cruciferen. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 12: 10– 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinata, K., Nishio, T. 1980. Self-incompatibility in Crucifers. In: Tsunoda, S., Hinata, K., Gómez-Campo, C. (eds.) Brassica crops and wild allies. Tokyo: Japan Scientific Societies Press, pp. 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horovitz, A., Galil, J. 1972. Gynodioecism in East Mediterranean Hirschfeldia incana, Cruciferae. Bot. Gaz. Lond. 133: 127–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iltis, H.H. 1957. Studies in the Capparidaceae. III. Evolution and phylogeny of the western North American Cleomoideae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 44: 77–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, T.H. 1970a. Cytochemical localization of myrosinase (ß-thioglucosidase) in root tips of Sinapis alba. Protoplasma 1: 451–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, T.H. 1970b. The morphology, occurrence, and distribution of dilated cisternae of the endoplasmatic reticulum in tissues of plants of the Cruciferae. Protoplasma 71: 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janchen, E. 1942. Das System der Cruciferen. Oesterr. Bot. Z. 91: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaretzky, R. 1928. Untersuchungen über Chromosomen und Phylogenie bei einigen Cruciferen. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 68: 1–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaretzky, R. 1932. Beziehungen zwischen Chromosomenzahl und Systematik bei den Cruciferen. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 76: 485–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jart, A. 1978. The fatty acid composition of various cruciferous seeds. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 55: 873–875.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, D.A. 1950. Plant embryology. Waltham, MA: Chronica Botanica Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsell, B. 1986. A monograph of Farsetia (Cruciferae). Symb. Bot. Uppsala 25: 1–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, L.B. 1981. Myrosin cells and dilated cisternae of the endoplasmatic reticulum in the order Capparales. Nord. J. Bot. 1: 433–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, S.W., Sanders, W.R., Donoghue, M.J. 1994. Angiosperm family pairs: preliminary phylogenetic analyses. Harvard Pap. Bot. 5: 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerber, E., Buchloh, G. 1981. Sinapinfreie und sinapinhaltige Brassicaceae (= Cruciferen). Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 55: 377–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, A. 1960. Naturally derived isothiocyanates (mustard oils) and their parent glucosides. Fortschr. Chem. Org. Naturst. 18: 122–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer, A. 1976. Glucosinolates in the Cruciferae. In: Vaughan, J.G., Macleod, A.J., Jones, B.M.G. (eds.) The biology and chemistry of the Cruciferae. London: Academic Press, pp. 207–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, M., Bishop, J., Mitchell-Olds, T. 1999. Molecular systematics and evolution of Arabidopsis and Arabis. Plant Biol. 1: 529–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowal, E., Cutler, D.F. 1975. The wood anatomy of Schouwia purpurea subsp. arabica and Fabrisinapis fruticosus (Cruciferae). Kew Bull. 30: 503–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, G. 1846. Einige Bemerkungen über den Blumenbau der Fumariaceae und Cruciferae. Bot. Zeitung Berlin 4:137– 150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P.R., Tsunoda, S. 1980. Variation in oil content and fatty acid composition among seeds from the Cruciferae. In: Tsunoda, S., Hinata, K., Gómez-Campo, C. (eds.) Brassica crops and wild allies. Tokyo: Japan Scientific Societies Press, pp. 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P.B.A.N., Dushenkov, V., Motto, H., Raskin, I. 1995. Phytoextraction: The use of plants to remove heavy metals from soils. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29: 1232–1238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahham, J.N., Al-Eisawi, D. 1987. Pollen morphology of Jordanian Cruciferae. Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 23: 355–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanning, F.C. 1961. Calcite in Lesquerella ovalifolia trichomes. Science 133: 380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Les, D.H. 1994. Molecular systematics and taxonomy of lake cress (Neobeckia aquatica; Brassicaceae), an imperiled aquatic mustard. Aquat. Bot. 49: 149–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lestiboudois, T. 1826. Mémoire sur l’insertion des étamines des Crucifères. Rev. Trav. Soc. Amat. Sci. Lille 1823: 243–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louda, S.M., Rodman, J.E. 1983. Concentration of glucosinolates in relation to habitat and insect herbivory for the native Crucifer Cardamine cordifolia. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 11: 199–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, A.J. 1976. Volatile flavour compounds in the Cruciferae. In: Vaughan, J.G., Macleod, A.J., Gómez-Campo, C. (eds.) The biology and chemistry of the Cruciferae. London: Academic Press, pp. 307–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manton, I. 1932. Introduction to the general cytology of the Cruciferae. Ann. Bot. Lond. I, 46: 509–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marais, W. 1970. Cruciferae. In: Codd, L.E., De Winter, B., Killick, D.J.B., Rycroft, H.B. (eds.) Flora of southern Africa. Vol. 13. Kirstenbosch: National Botanic Gardens, pp. 1–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markgraf, F. 1958. Cruciferae. In: Hegi, G. (ed.) Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa, ed. 2, Vol. 4, 2. München: Hanser, pp. 73–514..

    Google Scholar 

  • Matile, P. 1980. “Die Senfölbombe”: Zur Kompartimentierung des Myrosinasesystems. Biochem. Physiol. Pflanzen 175: 722–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, S.P., Shen, Z.G., Zhao, F.J. 1997. Heavy metal uptake and chemical changes in the rhizosphere of Thlaspi caerulescens and Thlaspi ochroleucum grown in contaminated soils. Plants Soil 188: 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merxmüller, H., Leins, P. 1967. Die Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der Kreuzblütler und Mohngewächse. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 86: 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C.R., Chalk, L. 1957. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miannay, N. 1971. Embryologie des Crucifères. Polyembryonie chez l’Arabis hirsuta Scop. et l’Arabis halleri L. Bull. Soc. Bot. France 118: 341–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misra, R.C. 1966. Morphology studies on Sisymbrium irio Linn. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 45: 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, P. 1973. Chromosome study as an aid in tracing the evolution of Cruciferae. Cytologia 40: 727–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, A. 1961. Zur Charakterisierung der Blüten und Infloreszenzen von Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Kulturpflanze 9: 364–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller, J. 1981. Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms. Bot. Rev. Lancaster 47: 1–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Schneider, P. 1986. Diasporology of the spermatophytes of the Grisons (Switzerland). Veröff. Geobot. Inst. ETH Stiftung Rübel Zürich 85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, G.A., Findlay, J.N. 1971. Sexual reproduction and agamospermy in the genus Draba. Can. J. Bot. 48: 269–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mummenhoff, K. 1995. Should Cardaria (L.) Desv. be classified within the genus Lepidium L. (Brassicaceae)?–Evidence from subunit polypeptide composition of RUBISCO. Feddes Repert. 106: 25–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mummenhoff, K., Koch, M. 1994. Chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and phylogenetic relationships in the genus Thlaspi sensu lato (Brassicaceae). Syst. Bot. 19: 73– 88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mummenhoff, K., Kuhnt, E., Koch, M., Zunk, K. 1995. Systematic implications of chloroplast DNA variation in Lepidium sections Cardamon, Lepiocardamon and Lepia (Brassicaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 196: 75–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mummenhoff, K., Franzke, A., Koch, M. 1997a. Molecular data reveal convergence in fruit characters used in the classification of Thlaspi s.l. (Brassicaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 125: 183–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mummenhoff, K., Franzke, A., Koch, M. 1997b. Molecular phylogenetics of Thlaspi s.l. (Brassicaceae) based on chloroplast DNA restriction site variation and sequences of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Can. J. Bot. 75: 469–482.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mummenhoff, K., Coja, U., Brüggemann, H. 2001. Pachyphragma and Gagria (Brassicaceae) revisited: molecular data indicate close relationship to Thlaspi s.str. Folia Geobot. 36: 293–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murley, M.R. 1951. Seeds of the Cruciferae of northeastern North America. Am. Midl. Nat. 46: 1–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasrallah, J.B. 2000. Cell-cell signaling and self-incompatibility response. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 3: 368–373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Netolitzky, F. 1926. Anatomie der Angiospermen-Samen. Berlin: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Kane, S.L., Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1997. A synopsis of Arabidopsis (Brassicaceae). Novon 7: 323–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paliwal, G.S. 1967. Ontogeny of stomata in some Cruciferae. Can. J. Bot. 45: 495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pant, D.D., Kidwai, P.F. 1967. Development of stomata in some Cruciferae. Ann. Bot. Lond 31: 513–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A.M., Maun, M.A. 1981. Dispersal and floating ability of dimorphic fruit segments of Cakile edentula var. lacustris. Can. J. Bot. 59: 2595–2602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, E.G., Jensen, W. 1967. Ontogeny and cytochemistry of chalazal proliferating cells of Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medic. New Phytol. 66: 413–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prantl, K. 1891. Cruciferae. In: Engler, A., Prantl, K. (eds.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Vol. III, 2. Leipzig: Engelmann, pp. 145–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, K. 1975. Development and organization of gametophytes in certain species of Cruciferae. Acta Bot. Indica 3: 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, K. 1976. Seed coat structure and development in certain species of Cruciferae. Int. Q. J. Plant Sci. Res. 3: 95–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, K. 1979. Morphology and histochemistry of the nucellus and endosperm of Cruciferae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 100: 536–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, R.E. 1986. Pollen-ovule ratios in the Cruciferae. Am. J. Bot. 73: 1732–1740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston, R.E. 1991. The intrafloral phenology of Streptanthus tortuosus (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 78: 1044–1053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, R.A., Palmer, J.D., Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1994. Systematic relationships of Arabidopsis: A molecular and morphological perspective. In: Meyerowitz, E.M., Somerville, C.R. (eds.) Arabidopsis. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, R.D. 1988. Nickel and zinc accumulation by species of Thlaspi L., Cochlearia L. and other genera of the Brassicaceae. Taxon 37: 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, R.D., Brooks, R.R., Macfarlane, R.M. 1981. Nickel uptake by Californian Streptanthus and Caulanthus with particular reference to the hyperaccumulator S. polygaloides Gray (Brassicaceae). Am. J. Bot. 68: 708–712.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, R.D., Brooks, R.R., Dudley, T.R. 1983. Uptake of nickel by species of Alyssum, Bornmüllera and other genera of Old World tribus Alysseae. Taxon 32: 184–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, R. 1956. The influence of the breeding system on the genecology of Thlaspi alpestre L. New Phytol. 55: 319– 330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, B.L. 1896. The fruit of Tropidocarpum. Erythea 4: 108–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, J.E. 1974. Systematics and evolution of the genus Cakile (Cruciferae). Contrib. Gray Herb. 205: 3–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, J.E. 1981. Divergence, convergence, and parallelism in phytochemical characters: the glucosinolate-myrosinase system. In: Young, D.A., Seigler, D.S. (eds.) Phytochemistry and angiosperm phylogeny. New York: Praeger, pp. 43– 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, J.E. 1991a. A taxonomic analysis of glucosinolateproducing plants. Part 1. Phenetics. Syst. Bot. 16: 598– 618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, J.E. 1991b. A taxonomic analysis of glucosinolateproducing plants. Part 2. Cladistics. Syst. Bot. 16: 619– 629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, J.E., Kruckeberg, A., Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1981. Chemotaxonomic diversity and complexity in seed glucosinolates of Caulanthus and Streptanthus (Cruciferae). Syst. Bot. 6: 197–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, J.E., Brower, L., Frey, J. 1982. Cardenolides in North American Erysimum (Cruciferae), a preliminary chemotaxonomic report. Taxon 31: 507–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, J., Price, R.A., Karol, K., Conti, E., Sytsma, K.J., Palmer, J.D. 1993. Nucleotide sequences of the rbcL gene indicate monophyly of mustard oil plants. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 686–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, J.E., Karol, K.G., Price, R.A., Conti, E., Sytsma, K.J. 1994. Nucleotide sequences of rbcL confirm the capparalean affinity of the Australian endemic Gyrostemonaceae. Aust. Syst. Bot. 7: 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, J., Soltis, P.S., Soltis, D.E., Sytsma, K.J. 1996a. Dual origin of mustard oil biosynthesis inferred from congruent 18 S ribosomal RNA and plastid rbcL gene phylogenies. Am. J. Bot. 83: 188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, J.E., Karol, K.G., Price, R.A., Sytsma, K.J. 1996b. Molecules, morphology, and Dahlgren’s expanded order Capparales. Syst. Bot. 21: 289–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R.C. 1939. The cruciferous genus Physaria. Rhodora 41: 391–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R.C. 1959. The genus Synthlipsis (Cruciferae). Rhodora 61: 253–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R.C. 1963a. The evolution and systematics of Leavenworthia (Cruciferae). Contrib. Gray Herb. 192: 3–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R.C. 1963b. Protandry in two species of Streptanthus ( Cruciferae ). Rhodora 65: 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R.C. 1971. Protogyny in the Cruciferae and notes on Arabis and Caulanthus. Contrib. Gray Herb. 201: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R.C. 1981 a. Studies in the genus Physaria (Cruciferae). Brittonia 33: 332–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R.C. 1981b. Weeds of the Cruciferae (Brassicaceae) in North America. J. Arnold Arbor. 62: 517–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R.C. 1993. The Cruciferae of continental North America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R.C., Banerjee, U.C. 1975. Atlas of the trichomes of Les-querella (Cruciferae). Cambridge, MA: Bussey Institution of Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R.C., Banerjee, U.C. 1976. Trichomes in studies of the Cruciferae. In: Vaughan, J.G., Macleod, A.J., Jones, B.M.G. (eds.) The biology and chemistry of the Cruciferae. London: Academic Press, pp. 145–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R.C., Banerjee, U.C. 1979. Pollens of the Cruciferae. Cambridge, MA: Bussey Institution of Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollins, R.C., Shaw, E.A. 1973. The genus Lesquerella (Cruciferae) in North America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rytz, W. 1936. Systematische, ökologische und geographische Probleme bei den Brassiceen. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges. 46: 517–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, E.R. 1923. The bractless inflorescence of the Cruciferae. New Phytol. 22: 150–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, E.R. 1929. On a new view of the nature of the median carpels in the Cruciferae. Am. J. Bot. 16: 122–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. 1935. Untersuchungen über die Samenschleudermechanismen verschiedener Rhoeadales. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 81: 663–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, O.E. 1919. Cruciferae-Brassiceae. Pars 1. In: Engler, A., (ed.) Das Pflanzenreich. Leipzig: W. Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, O.E. 1923. Cruciferae-Brassiceae. Pars 2. In: Engler, A. (ed.) Das Pflanzenreich. Vol. 4, 105 (Heft 84). Leipzig: W. Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, O.E. 1936. Cruciferae. In: Engler, A., Prantl, K. (eds.) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd edn. Vol. 17b. Leipzig: W. Engelmann, pp. 227–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweidler, J.H. 1905. Die systematische Bedeutung der Eiweiß-und Myrosinzellen nebst Beiträgen zu ihrer anatomisch-physiologischen Kenntnis. Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges. 23: 274–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweidler, J.H. 1911. Über den Grundtypus und die systematische Bedeutung der Cruciferen-Nectarien I. Beih. Bot. Centralbl. 27: 337–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E.A. 1972. Revision of Stenopetalum (Cruciferae). J. Arnold Arbor. 53: 52–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinheil, A. 1839. Considérations sur l’usage que l’on peut faire des rapports de position qui existent entre la bractée et les parties de chaque verticille floral, dans la détermination du plan normal sur lequel les différentes fleurs sont construites. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. Biol. Vég. II, 12: 169–211, 279–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A. 1969. Flowering plants–origin and dispersal. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan,A.L.1981. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R.D., Kaufmann, H., Kirch, H.H., Salamini, F. 1991. Self-incompatibility in flowering plants. In: Harding, J., Singh, F., Mol, J.N.M. (eds.) Genetics and breeding of ornamental species. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 367–385.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Troll, W. 1964. Die Infloreszenzen, Typologie und Stellung im Aufbau des Vegetationskörpers. Jena: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troll, W., Heidenhain, B. 1951. Beiträge zur Kenntnis racemöser Infloreszenzformen. Akad. Wiss. Abh. Math.- Naturwiss. Kl. 5: 139–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Pijl, L. 1982. Principles of dispersal in higher plants, 3rd edn. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, J.G., Whitehouse, J.M. 1971. Seed structure and the taxonomy of the Cruciferae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 64: 383–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, J.G., Phelan, J.R., Denford, K.E. 1976. Seed studies in the Cruciferae. In: Vaughan, J.G., Macleod,A.J., Jones, B.M.G. (eds.) The biology and chemistry of the Cruciferae. London: Academic Press, pp. 119–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viegi, L., Pagni, A.M., Corsi, G., Renzoni, G.C. 1976. Il sospensore embrionale nelle Cruciferae. I. Morfologia e struttura. Giorn. Bot. Ital. 110: 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vioque, J., Pastor, J.E., Alaiz, M., Vioque, E. 1994. Chemotaxonomic study of seed glucosinolate composition in Coincya Rouy (Brassicaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 116: 343–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voytenko, V.F. 1968. The forms of heterocarpy in the Brassicaceae Burn. family and the evaluation of their evolutionary significance. Bot. Zhurn. Moscow Leningrad 53: 1428–1439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, S.I., Al-Shehbaz, I.A. 1998. Generic evaluation of Boleum, Euzomodendron, and Vella ( Brassicaceae ). Novon 8: 321–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, S.I., Anderson, K.J. 1993. Guide to the wild germplasm of Brassica and allied crops. Part II. Chromosome numbers in the tribe Brassiceae (Cruciferae). Agric. Can. Res. Branch Tech. Bull. 1993: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, S.I., Black, L.D. 1991. Molecular systematics of Bras-sica and allied genera (subtribe Brassicinae, Brassiceae)–chloroplast genome and cytodeme congruence. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82: 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, S.I., Black, L.D. 1994. Evaluation of the subtribes Moricandiinae, Savignyinae, Vellinae, and Zillinae (Brassicaceae, tribe Brassiceae) using chloroplast DNA restriction site variation. Can. J. Bot. 72: 1692–1701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, S.I., Black, L.D. 1997. Phylogenetic implications of chloroplast DNA restriction site variation in subtribes Raphaninae and Cakilinae (Brassicaceae, tribe Brassiceae). Can. J. Bot. 75: 960–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, S.I., Black, L.D., Aguinagalde, I. 1992. Molecular systematics of Brassica and allied genera (subtribe Brassicinae, Brassiceae)–chloroplast DNA variation in the genus Diplotaxis. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 839–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. 1973. Stipularbildungen bei Dentaria und ihr Wert für die morphologische Deutung der Speicherschuppen als Phyllodien. Oesterr. Bot. Z. 121: 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weberling, F. 1956. Morphologische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen über die Ausbildung des Unterblattes bei dikotylen Gewächsen. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 32: 27–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weberling, F. 1989. Morphology of flowers and inflorescences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, R. 1935. Handbuch der systematischen Botanik, 4th edn. Leipzig: Deuticke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yen, C. 1959. On a new view of carpel morphology in Brassica. Acta Bot. Sin. 8: 271–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary, M. 1948a. Carpological studies in Cruciferae. Palestine J. Bot., Jerusalem 4: 158–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary, M. 1948b. Follicular dehiscence in Cruciferae. Lloydia 11: 226–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuberi,M.I., Lewis, D. 1988. Gametophytic-sporophytic incompatibility in the Cruciferae Brassica campestris. Heredity 61: 367–377.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Appel, O., Al-Shehbaz, I.A. (2003). Cruciferae. In: Kubitzki, K., Bayer, C. (eds) Flowering Plants · Dicotyledons. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, vol 5. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07255-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07255-4_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-07680-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-07255-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics