Trade, Investment and Debt in a Two-Country Growth Model

  • Karl-Josef Koch
  • Klaus Neusser
Part of the Studies in International Economics and Institutions book series (INTERN.ECONOM.)

Abstract

We study a dynamic version of a Heckscher-Ohlin model with two countries, two factors and two sectors of production. It is based on the neoclassical growth model by Oniki and Uzawa (1965). We remove their balance of payments restriction by introducing an international market for equity shares of the type used by Hori and Stein (1977). We solve the indeterminacy problem of the capital market in case of factor price equalization by making explicit assumptions on the investment behavior. Two extreme cases are considered which correspond to different attitudes towards domestic versus foreign investment. The model has a unique and globally stable steady state with factor price equalization. Along the adjustment path international debt serves the purpose of increasing efficiency. In the long run holding foreign equity shares can bridge the gap between two possibly conflicting goals: efficiency requires similar factor endowments whereas different consumer preferences establish the need of an uneven income distribution. If consumers are different enough, there will be unbalanced trade and international debt in the long run.

Keywords

Income Stein Rium Allo 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albert, M. (1989), “Capital Mobility and Costs of Adjustment”, Discussion Paper, Serie II — Nr.96, University of Konstanz, SFB 178.Google Scholar
  2. Dixit, A. K., V. Norman (1980), “The Theory of International Trade”, Cambridge / Mass..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fisher, S., J. A. Frenkel (1974), “Interest Rate Equalization and Patterns of Production, Trade and Consumption in a Two-Country Growth Model”, The Economic Record, 50, 555–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hori, H., J. L. Stein (1977), “International Growth with Free Trade in Equities and Goods”, International Economic Review, 18, 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kemp, M. C. (1968), “International Trade and Investment in a Context of Growth”, The Economic Record, 44, 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Koch, K.-J., (1989), “Trade, Investment and Debt in a Two-Country Growth Model”, mimeo, University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
  7. Oniki, H., H. Uzawa (1965), “Patterns of Trade and Investment in a Dynamic Model of International Trade”, Review of Economic Studies, 32, 15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Vosgerau, H.-J. (1989), “International Capital Movements and Trade in Intertemporal Setting”, in: Gordon, I., A. P. Thirlwall (eds.), European Factor Mobility, 215–232.Google Scholar
  9. Baxter, M. (1988), “Dynamic Real Trade Models: New Directions for Open Economy Macroeconomics”, Working Paper No. 167, University of Rochester, USA.Google Scholar
  10. Neusser, K. (1990), “Testing the Long-Run Implications of the Neoclassical Growth Model”, Journal of Monetary Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  11. Summers, R. Heston, A. (1987), “A New Set of International Comparisons of Real Product and Price Levels, Estimates for 130 Countries, 1950–1985”, Review of Income and Wealth, 34, pp. 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karl-Josef Koch
  • Klaus Neusser

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations