Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic Theory ((ECON.THEORY,volume 1))

Abstract

This paper provides an axiomatization of recursive utility functions in an infinite horizon stochastic setting. In addition, some recently developed atemporal non-expected utility theories are integrated axiomatically into an intertemporal framework. The key axioms deal with intertemporal consistency and attitudes towards the temporal resolution of uncertainty.

We are grateful to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and to the National Science Foundation for financial support and to Tan Wang for pointing out an error in an earlier draft of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boyd, J., 1990, “Recursive Utility and the Ramsey Problem,” J. Econ. Theory 50, 326–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S. H., 1983, “A Generalization of the Quasilinear Mean with Applications to the Measurement of Income Inequality and Decision Theory Resolving the Allais Paradox,” Econometrica 51, 1065–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S. H., 1989, “Axiomatic Utility Theories with the Betweenness Property,” Ann. Oper. Res. 19, 273–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S. H. and Epstein, L. G., 1989, “The Structure of Preferences and Attitudes Towards the Timing of the Resolution of Uncertainty,” Int. Econ. Rev. 30, 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chew, S. H., Epstein, L. G., and Segal, U., 1990, “Mixture Symmetry and Quadratic Utility,” Econometrica, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, V. G., 1989, “The Effects of Temporal Uncertainty Resolution on the Overall Utility and Suspense of Risky Monetary and Survival Gambles,” Ph.D. dissertation, Department bf Psychology, McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debreu, G., 1954, “Representation of a Preference Ordering by a Numerical Function,” in Decision Processes, R. Thrall, C. Coombs and R. David, eds., New York, John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekel, E., 1986, “An Axiomatic Characterization of Preferences Under Uncertainty,” J. Econ. Theory 40, 304–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. G., 1983, “Stationary Cardinal Utility and Optimal Growth Under Uncertainty,” J. Econ. Theory 31, 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. G., 1988, “Risk Aversion and Asset Prices,” J. Monetary Econ. 22, 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. G. and Hynes, A. J., 1983, “The Rate of Time Preference and Dynamic Economic Analysis,” J. Pol. Econ. 91, 611–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, L. G. and Zin, S. E., 1989, “Substitution, Risk Aversion and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: A Theoretical Framework,” Econometrica 57, 937–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, T. H. and Donaldson, J. B., 1985, “The Structure of Intertemporal Preferences Under Uncertainty and Time Consistent Plans,” Econometrica 53, 1451–1458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. C., 1960, “Stationary Ordinal Utility and Impatience,” Econometrica 28, 287–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. C., Diamond, P., and Williamson, R., 1964, “Stationary Utility and Time Perspective,” Econometrica 32, 82–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. M. and Porteus, E. L., 1978, “Temporal Resolution of Uncertainty and Dynamic Choice Theory,” Econometrica 46, 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. and Stokey, N., 1984, “Optimal Growth with Many Consumers,” J. Econ. Theory 32, 139–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. J., 1988, “Dynamic Consistency and Non-Expected Utility Models of Choice Under Uncertainty,” J. Econ. Lit. 27, 1622–1668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens, J. F. and Zamir, S., 1985, “Formulation of Bayesian Analysis for Games with Incomplete Information,” Int. J. Game Theory 14, 1-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, R. B., 1985, “Bayesian Equilibrium and Incentive Compatibility: An Introduction,” in Social Goals and Social Organizations, Essays in Memory of Elisha Pazner, L. Hurwicz, D. Schmeidler, and H. Sonnenschein, eds., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathy, K. R., 1967, Probability Measures on Metric Spaces, New York, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzawa, H., 1968, “Time Preference, the Consumption Function, and Optimum Asset Holdings,” in Value, Capital and Growth: Papers in Honour of Sir John Hicks, J. N. Wolfe, ed., Chicago, Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chew, S.H., Epstein, L.G. (1991). Recursive Utility Under Uncertainty. In: Khan, M.A., Yannelis, N.C. (eds) Equilibrium Theory in Infinite Dimensional Spaces. Studies in Economic Theory, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07071-0_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-07071-0_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08114-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-07071-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics