Advertisement

Notions of Nature in Traditional Hinduism

  • Axel Michaels
Chapter
Part of the Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung book series (ETHICSSCI, volume 19)

Abstract

This article focusses on four features in the perception of nature which are specific to Hinduism. However, this does not imply that I summarize the concept of nature in Hinduism for there is no such single concept. Any attempt to put forward such a concept would be falsifying Hindu thought which is based on a variety of independent sources, social groups, languages and regions and which, therefore, cannot be reduced to a one, single, uniform world-view. In this context, it must not be forgotten that the term “Hinduism” itself, denoting a monolithic religion, was coined by Muslims to speak of the phenomenon of Indian religious life, whereas the so-called Hindus themselves have not tended to regard theselves as a unitary social group or community. Thus, in those cases where the Hindu conceptions of nature is spoken of it is usually either simplistic or reductive and even wrong, tending predominantly to focus on just one corpus of literature, the Sanskrit literature, and merely one social group, the Brahmin priests.

Keywords

Individual Soul Categorization Ofthe Sanskrit Literature Pure Spirit Hindu Conception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dimmit C, Van Buitenen J A B (1978) Classical Hindu Mythology. A Reader in the Sanskrit Pur~_as. Sri Satguru Publications, Delhi (reprint )Google Scholar
  2. Chapple C (1993) Nonviolence to Animals, Earth and Self in Asian Traditions. State University of New York Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Ellen RF (1996) The cognitive geometry of nature: a contextual approach. In: Descola Ph, Pâlsson G (ed) Nature and Society: Anthropological Perspectives. Routledge, London and New York, pp 103–123Google Scholar
  4. Gombrich R (1975) Ancient Indian Cosmology. In: Blacker C, Lowew M (ed) Ancient Cosmologies. George Allen & Unwin, London. pp 110–42Google Scholar
  5. Houben JEM, Van Kooij KR (eds) (1999) Violence Denied. Violence, Non-Violence and the Rationalization of Violence in South Asian Cultural History. Brill, Leiden, Boston, KölnGoogle Scholar
  6. Kirfel W (1920) Die Kosmographie der Inder nach den Quellen dargestellt. Schroeder, Bonn und LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  7. Larson GJ (1979) Classical S~_khya: An Interpretation of Its History and Meaning. 2nd. rev. ed. Ross Erikson, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  8. Larson GJ, Bhattacharya RS (1987) S~_khya: A Dualist Tradition of Indian Philosophy. Motilal Banarsidass, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  9. Michaels A (1995) Reinkarnation: ein morgenländisches `Dogma’?. Der Evangelische Erzieher 47.2: 159–170Google Scholar
  10. Michaels A (1996) La nature pour la nature. Naturzerstörung und Naturschonung im traditionellen Indien. Asiatische Studien 50: 817–34Google Scholar
  11. Michaels A (1998) Der Hinduismus. Geschichte und Gegenwart. C. H. Beck Verlag, MunichGoogle Scholar
  12. Michaels A (1999) Sakralisierung als Naturschutz. Heilige Bäume und Wälder in Nepal. In: Sieferle P, Breuninger H (eds) Natur-Bilder. Wahrnehmungen von Natur und Umwelt in der Geschichte. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt/M, pp 117–136Google Scholar
  13. Neufeldt RN (ed) (1986) Karma and Rebirth: Post-Classical Developments. State University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. O’Flaherty WD (ed) (1980) Karma and Rebirth in Classical Indian Traditions. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  15. Olivelle P (1996) Upani_ads. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Panikkar R (1991) There is no outer without inner space. In: Vatsyayan K (ed) Concepts of Space. Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, New Delhi, pp 7–38Google Scholar
  17. Schmithausen L (1985) Buddhismus und Natur. In: Panikkar R, Strolz W (eds) Die Verantwortung des Menschen fir eine bewohnbare Welt in Christentum, Hinduismus und Buddhismus. Herder, Freiburg/Bale/Vienna 1985, pp 100–133Google Scholar
  18. Schmithausen L (1991) The Problem of the Sentience of Plants in Earliest Buddhism, Intern. Institute for Buddist Studies, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  19. Schwartzberg J (1992) South Asian Cartography. In: Harley JB, Woodward D (eds) Cartography in the Traditional Islamic and South Asian Societies. Chicago University Press, Chicago und LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Slaje W (1989) Bewußtsein und Wahrnehmungsvermögen von Pflanzen aus hinduistischer Sicht. In: Scholz B (ed) Der Orientalische Mensch und seine Beziehung zur Umwelt, RM-Druck and Verlagsgesellschaft, Graz, pp 149–169Google Scholar
  21. Stietencron H v (1993) Toleranz gegenüber der Natur? Ein Blick auf die Sichtweise der Hindus. Dialog der Religionen 2: 114–28Google Scholar
  22. Wezler A (ed) Die indische Idee der gewaltlosen Beziehung zwischen Mensch und Natur. Verlag Dr. Inge Wezler, Hamburg (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Axel Michaels

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations