The Concept of Sacred Linked to Biological Resource Management in the Himalayan Culture

  • B. Sinha
  • P. S. Ramakrishnan
  • K. G. Saxena
  • R. K. Maikhuri
Chapter
Part of the Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung book series (ETHICSSCI, volume 19)

Abstract

There is a wide recognition throughout the globe and across disciplines that regions of ecological prudence exhibit a symbiotic relationship between habitats and culture (Arizpe, 1996). This explicates that culture and environment are complementary in various stages of evolution. Traditional societies have co-evolved with their environment, modifying nature but actively maintaining it in a diverse and productive state based on their indigenous knowledge, socio-cultural practices and/or religious beliefs since antiquity (Gadgil and Berkes, 1991; Ramakrishnan, 1998). However, these traditional societies are no longer immune to the changes occurring in the world with time. The predominant culture of over-consumption of natural resources is making a dent into these societies, resulting in erosion of their time-tested and valued institutions. At present, when the social fragmentation reaches to the family level and individual interests get priority, the community functions take a back seat. Further, access to information is no more a limiting phenomenon in this era of information technology; as a result it has been observed that the heterogeneity of the culture that evolved in isolation is being increasingly homogenized (Robertsons, 1992). Such a distortion has been noted in the Himalayan societies too.

Keywords

Social Stratification Silt Betula Willow Folk 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arizpe L (1996) Culture and Environment. Nature and Resources 32 (1): 1Google Scholar
  2. Boojh R, Ramakrishnan PS (1983) Sacred groves and their role in environmental conservation. In: strategies for environmental management. Souvenir Vol. Dept. of Science and Environment of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow, pp 6–8Google Scholar
  3. Durkheim E (1961) The Elementary Forms of religious life. Collier Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Gadgil M, Berkes F (1991) Traditional resource management systems. Resource Management and Optimization 18: 127–141Google Scholar
  5. Gadgil M, Guha R (1992) The fissured land. An ecological history of India. Oxford University Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  6. Gadgil M, Vartak VD (1976) The sacred groves of the Western Ghats in India. Eco. Bot. 30: 152–160Google Scholar
  7. Hanna S, Folke C, Maler K-G (1996) Property rights and the natural environment. In: Hanna S, Folke C, Maler K-G (eds) Rights to nature: ecological, cultural and political principle of institutions for the environment. Island press, Washington DC, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  8. Khaneghah AA (1998) Social and cultural aspects of sacred trees in Iran. In: Ramakrishnan PS, Saxena KG, Chandrashekara UM (eds) Conserving the sacred: for biodiversity management. UNESCO and Oxford * IBH, New Delhi, pp. 123–128Google Scholar
  9. Khiewtam RS, Ramakrishnan PS (1989) Socio-cultural studies of the sacred groves at Cherrapunji and adjoining areas in north-eastern India. Man in India 69: 64–71Google Scholar
  10. Lebbie AR, Guries RP (1995) Ethonobotanical value and conservation of sacred groves of the Kpaa Mende in Sierra Leone. Eco. Bot. 49 (3): 297–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Poffenberger M, Josayma C, Walpole P, Lawrence K (1995) Transitions in forest management: shifting community forestry from project to process. Asia Forest Network, BerkelyGoogle Scholar
  12. Ramakrishnan PS (1992) Shifting agriculture and sustainable development-an interdisciplinary study from North-Eastern India. MAB, UNESCO, Paris and Parthenon Pub. Group, Canforth, Lancas, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Ramakrishnan PS (1996) Conserving the sacred: from species to landscape. Nature and Resources 32 (1): 11–19Google Scholar
  14. Ramakrishnan PS (1998) Conserving the scared for biodiversity: the conceptual framework. In: Ramakrishnan PS, Saxena KG Chandrashekara UM (eds) Conserving the sacred: for biodiversity management. UNESCO and Oxford * IBH, New Delhi, pp 3–15Google Scholar
  15. Ramakrishnan PS, Saxena KG, Chandrashekara UM eds (1998) Conserving the sacred: for biodiversity management. UNESCO and Oxford * IBH, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  16. Robertson R (1992) Globalisation: social theory and global culture. Sage Publication, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Vidyarthi LP, Jha M, Sarswati BN (1979) The sacred complex of Kashi (A microcosm of Indian Civilization). Concept Publishing company, DelhiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Sinha
  • P. S. Ramakrishnan
  • K. G. Saxena
  • R. K. Maikhuri

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations